What do you think?
Rate this book
Power Politics
317p paperback, scarlet cover and blue spine, very good condition, binding intact, pages clean and neat, covers a little creased but no significant wear, a very good copy of a rare title, this copy published in the year 1979
Paperback
First published January 1, 1946
3 people are currently reading
216 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews
August 21, 2010
Like Bull's The Anarchical Society, this book is one of the best representations of the "British School" of international relations. This school, which sees the international system as a sort of "society" in which members understand and more or less play by the "rules," was in opposition to and a challenge of E. H. Carr's view of the international system in terms of class conflict. Carr is typically considered a "realist" because of his thorough debunking of "utopianism," but in fact the former Foreign Officer was drawn to Marxist (if not Leninist) interpretations of world affairs.
The book is not always easy to read but it is essential in order to understand the British views of "international society." See also Power and the Pursuit of Peace and War in International Society.
The book is not always easy to read but it is essential in order to understand the British views of "international society." See also Power and the Pursuit of Peace and War in International Society.
January 14, 2025
Overall a good book if you are interested in learning some of the basics of International Relations. Wight defines power politics as being international politics, or the relations between states (i.e. powers). He was associated with the so-called British committee on the theory of international politics.
Although offering a lot of insight into the field of IR, with in-depth and often tedious historical references to support his ideas, it is nonetheless a Eurocentric view of international politics. Wight paints all states with the same brush - and presupposes that the state structures in other countries are (or must be) like European ones. He disregards the history of countries lying outside of the European continent, only mentioning Russian and Ottoman empires (albeit their period of collapse), while completely ignoring European Mercantilist policies and colonial history.
All in all, not much should have been expected from a book originally written in 1946 in terms of objective analysis, as postcolonial IR is only recently getting a foothold, but it still has valuable contributions for anyone interested in learning some of the basics of IR theory.
Although offering a lot of insight into the field of IR, with in-depth and often tedious historical references to support his ideas, it is nonetheless a Eurocentric view of international politics. Wight paints all states with the same brush - and presupposes that the state structures in other countries are (or must be) like European ones. He disregards the history of countries lying outside of the European continent, only mentioning Russian and Ottoman empires (albeit their period of collapse), while completely ignoring European Mercantilist policies and colonial history.
All in all, not much should have been expected from a book originally written in 1946 in terms of objective analysis, as postcolonial IR is only recently getting a foothold, but it still has valuable contributions for anyone interested in learning some of the basics of IR theory.
December 17, 2024
Martin Wight’s Power Politics is a seminal work in the field of International Relations (IR), offering a probing analysis of the role of power and morality in world politics. First emerging as a series of lectures during the early Cold War period, Wight’s text remains a critical intervention in understanding the foundational dynamics of international systems. Its intellectual significance lies in its synthesis of historical and philosophical reflections on power, a method characteristic of Wight’s broader contribution to the English School of IR. This reprint, carefully edited by Hedley Bull and Carsten Holbraad, preserves Wight’s idiosyncratic style while making his insights available to new generations of scholars.
The book revolves around Wight’s core contention that international politics is fundamentally power politics, shaped by the pursuit of national interest, the balance of power, and the inevitability of conflict. Yet, Wight’s treatment of power is neither reductionist nor cynical. Instead, he juxtaposes realism with moral considerations, presenting power politics as both an empirical reality and a normative dilemma. His work reveals a deep engagement with the tensions between order, justice, and the practical constraints of international anarchy.
Structurally, Power Politics comprises six chapters, each addressing critical themes in IR: the nature of power, the role of war, the balance of power, international law, diplomacy, and the interplay between realism and idealism. Wight’s analysis is marked by its historical depth and philosophical rigor, drawing on classical thinkers like Thucydides, Hobbes, and Machiavelli, as well as modern theorists such as Hans Morgenthau. However, unlike Morgenthau’s strictly realist approach, Wight adopts a more reflective, dialectical perspective, acknowledging the interplay of power and ethics in global politics.
In the opening chapter, Wight establishes his conception of power politics, defining it as the competition for power among states under conditions of anarchy. He argues that while moral ideals—such as justice or peace—often inspire statecraft, they are inevitably subordinated to the exigencies of survival and national interest. For Wight, the state system is inherently conflictual, but this does not imply a nihilistic worldview. Rather, Wight insists that states must reconcile their pursuit of power with the normative ideals that underpin international society. This tension becomes a central theme of the book.
One of the strengths of Power Politics is Wight’s treatment of the balance of power, which he describes as a mechanism for preserving order within a competitive state system. Wight explores the historical evolution of the balance of power, analyzing its role in stabilizing Europe from the early modern period to the 20th century. However, he remains critical of its limitations, particularly in the face of ideological conflicts and the destructive potential of modern warfare. Wight’s reflections on the Cold War context are particularly prescient; he recognizes the fragile nature of nuclear deterrence while emphasizing the moral dilemmas posed by the pursuit of security in a bipolar world.
The book’s treatment of international law and diplomacy further illustrates Wight’s nuanced perspective. While acknowledging the formal weakness of international law under anarchy, he argues that it provides an indispensable normative framework for state interaction. Similarly, diplomacy, for Wight, is not merely an instrument of power but a mechanism for maintaining order and mitigating conflict. These discussions reflect Wight’s belief that international society—though fragile—remains an essential counterbalance to the excesses of power politics.
A central preoccupation of Wight’s work is the tension between realism and idealism. He rejects simplistic dichotomies between these approaches, instead advocating for a more historically grounded understanding of their interplay. Wight’s realism is tempered by his recognition of moral and ethical constraints, while his idealism remains grounded in the practical realities of international competition. This dialectical approach distinguishes Wight from both classical realists and utopian idealists, positioning him as a key thinker within the English School tradition.
Despite its many strengths, Power Politics is not without its limitations. As an edited collection of lectures, the book occasionally lacks the cohesion and systematic rigor of more formal theoretical works. Wight’s prose, while eloquent and insightful, can sometimes appear dense or elliptical, particularly for readers unfamiliar with his historical method. Additionally, Wight’s Eurocentrism, though reflective of his intellectual milieu, limits the scope of his analysis, as it overlooks the experiences of non-European states and alternative forms of political organization.
Nevertheless, Power Politics remains an enduring contribution to the study of IR. Wight’s historical sensitivity and philosophical depth offer a refreshing alternative to the abstractions of neorealism and the idealism of liberal institutionalism. His reflections on power, morality, and order continue to resonate in contemporary debates, particularly as the international system faces new challenges such as rising multipolarity, resurgent nationalism, and global governance crises.
In conclusion, Power Politics is a landmark text that exemplifies Martin Wight’s distinctive approach to International Relations. Through its careful balance of realism and moral reflection, the book challenges readers to grapple with the enduring dilemmas of power, order, and justice in a fragmented world. For scholars of IR, political theory, and history, Wight’s work remains an indispensable resource for understanding the complexities of international politics. While the world has changed significantly since Wight first delivered these lectures, his insights into the dynamics of power and the fragility of international order remain as relevant as ever.
GPT
The book revolves around Wight’s core contention that international politics is fundamentally power politics, shaped by the pursuit of national interest, the balance of power, and the inevitability of conflict. Yet, Wight’s treatment of power is neither reductionist nor cynical. Instead, he juxtaposes realism with moral considerations, presenting power politics as both an empirical reality and a normative dilemma. His work reveals a deep engagement with the tensions between order, justice, and the practical constraints of international anarchy.
Structurally, Power Politics comprises six chapters, each addressing critical themes in IR: the nature of power, the role of war, the balance of power, international law, diplomacy, and the interplay between realism and idealism. Wight’s analysis is marked by its historical depth and philosophical rigor, drawing on classical thinkers like Thucydides, Hobbes, and Machiavelli, as well as modern theorists such as Hans Morgenthau. However, unlike Morgenthau’s strictly realist approach, Wight adopts a more reflective, dialectical perspective, acknowledging the interplay of power and ethics in global politics.
In the opening chapter, Wight establishes his conception of power politics, defining it as the competition for power among states under conditions of anarchy. He argues that while moral ideals—such as justice or peace—often inspire statecraft, they are inevitably subordinated to the exigencies of survival and national interest. For Wight, the state system is inherently conflictual, but this does not imply a nihilistic worldview. Rather, Wight insists that states must reconcile their pursuit of power with the normative ideals that underpin international society. This tension becomes a central theme of the book.
One of the strengths of Power Politics is Wight’s treatment of the balance of power, which he describes as a mechanism for preserving order within a competitive state system. Wight explores the historical evolution of the balance of power, analyzing its role in stabilizing Europe from the early modern period to the 20th century. However, he remains critical of its limitations, particularly in the face of ideological conflicts and the destructive potential of modern warfare. Wight’s reflections on the Cold War context are particularly prescient; he recognizes the fragile nature of nuclear deterrence while emphasizing the moral dilemmas posed by the pursuit of security in a bipolar world.
The book’s treatment of international law and diplomacy further illustrates Wight’s nuanced perspective. While acknowledging the formal weakness of international law under anarchy, he argues that it provides an indispensable normative framework for state interaction. Similarly, diplomacy, for Wight, is not merely an instrument of power but a mechanism for maintaining order and mitigating conflict. These discussions reflect Wight’s belief that international society—though fragile—remains an essential counterbalance to the excesses of power politics.
A central preoccupation of Wight’s work is the tension between realism and idealism. He rejects simplistic dichotomies between these approaches, instead advocating for a more historically grounded understanding of their interplay. Wight’s realism is tempered by his recognition of moral and ethical constraints, while his idealism remains grounded in the practical realities of international competition. This dialectical approach distinguishes Wight from both classical realists and utopian idealists, positioning him as a key thinker within the English School tradition.
Despite its many strengths, Power Politics is not without its limitations. As an edited collection of lectures, the book occasionally lacks the cohesion and systematic rigor of more formal theoretical works. Wight’s prose, while eloquent and insightful, can sometimes appear dense or elliptical, particularly for readers unfamiliar with his historical method. Additionally, Wight’s Eurocentrism, though reflective of his intellectual milieu, limits the scope of his analysis, as it overlooks the experiences of non-European states and alternative forms of political organization.
Nevertheless, Power Politics remains an enduring contribution to the study of IR. Wight’s historical sensitivity and philosophical depth offer a refreshing alternative to the abstractions of neorealism and the idealism of liberal institutionalism. His reflections on power, morality, and order continue to resonate in contemporary debates, particularly as the international system faces new challenges such as rising multipolarity, resurgent nationalism, and global governance crises.
In conclusion, Power Politics is a landmark text that exemplifies Martin Wight’s distinctive approach to International Relations. Through its careful balance of realism and moral reflection, the book challenges readers to grapple with the enduring dilemmas of power, order, and justice in a fragmented world. For scholars of IR, political theory, and history, Wight’s work remains an indispensable resource for understanding the complexities of international politics. While the world has changed significantly since Wight first delivered these lectures, his insights into the dynamics of power and the fragility of international order remain as relevant as ever.
GPT
September 15, 2022
Clear, concise and pulls no punches. Wight is not afraid to condemn the immoral aspects of power, refers to 'demonic concentrations of power' which, like antichrist, bring about genocidal conflicts.
War and revolution, says Wight, are closely linked. Great powers are fewer in number today, but larger in size. Their object is to compete with rival powers in order to become a universal power.
There is, says Wight, no international law. Because nations are unpoliced, unindictable, cannot be tried in court, there is only 'international anarchy'.
Along with Animal Farm, Games People Play, The Naked Ape, this book 'tells it like it is'. Do read it.
War and revolution, says Wight, are closely linked. Great powers are fewer in number today, but larger in size. Their object is to compete with rival powers in order to become a universal power.
There is, says Wight, no international law. Because nations are unpoliced, unindictable, cannot be tried in court, there is only 'international anarchy'.
Along with Animal Farm, Games People Play, The Naked Ape, this book 'tells it like it is'. Do read it.
October 3, 2013
Still on of the best books I have ever read. The concentric circles of influence discussion inspired by this book will forever be a part of my worldview.
January 28, 2014
Good introductory book in IR
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews