Only one word can describe this book. Problematic.
In Black Woman Redefined, Sophia Nelson tells black women how they can set the record straight and redefine the way the world sees & portrays them and how these changes in portrayal can help us succeed. She uses First Lady Michelle Obama as her example & prototype of how all black women should be. She’s the woman who in Nelson and many other black women’s minds (including my own) has it all. Career, family, home, love, happy life. The question is: how do we get there?
While I do agree that black people, especially women, deserve a media makeover and deserve all of life’s merits and spoils, I question Sophia Nelson’s definition of what it means to “have it all” is. Being that some of our “definitions” weren’t the same, I essentially questioned/ had my doubts about this entire book.
Let’s think about what some women define as “having it all”. Like I mentioned before: Career, family, home, love, overall happy life. Nelson says that women of all ages would like some level of this. I can agree with this but, what level? First, we must look at what we already have. According to Nelson, black women seem to be excelling in career and material success. Other than that, Nelson basically shouts a great big “Do better!” everywhere else.
Now while I knew it wouldn’t all be positive, I didn’t read this book for a pity party. Sadly enough, a lot of Nelson’s solutions to black women’s problems root in some sort of self blame or include respectability politics. Meanwhile, she doesn’t take much account for other people’s ignorance and black women just have to “work through it”. Instead of people just learning better and doing better, we have to clean up their minds for them too, no matter how wrong they may be.
I am 23 years old and probably have only a small degree of everything that I would love to have in life. Right now, similar to many women my age, I’m trying to get my career out of park. Honestly, I would like a lot of the things, material/physical/secular and emotional/spiritual that Nelson mentions. However I think that things like being married/having kids may not be for everyone no matter how badly we may want it. It just might not be in the cards.
As a woman who feels as if she is starting from the bottom, I’ve been trying to get all the advice I can get. Unfortunately, this book seemed to be too little too late for me since I’ve already decided what my version of “having it all” may include and to what extent. Most of Nelson’s advice seems to focus on finding a man, fixing yourself so that you can find a man, or keeping a man. Why does fulfillment equal a man? Men don't get fed this doctrine so why should we keep following it in hopes of attracting one. Can I just be financially stable, travel, count my blessings, and get a dog?
Nelson does not seem to have much advice for women starting their career that shouldn’t already be commonplace other than building stronger networks with white people and not being an overall Mean Girl.
To say this book is supposed to be cross-generational, she does an excellent job at making the gap bigger. If there’s anything I’ve learned about wanting to make a difference or teach people, it’s that you can’t insult the people you’re trying to teach. Nelson does this early on by doing one thing, both directly and indirectly: blaming hip-hop for our problems.
(Sure, because the 20-somethings you want reading this book that you may want to reach are only listening to gospel music and old school jams.)
Now while I do agree that there are some toxic messages within music, I do believe it’s a mistake to continue demonizing a genre that’s considered to be a voice of the young black community. One thing I’ve learned to put stock into is the marketplace of ideas; there are a lot of ideas floating around about the messages portrayed in hip-hop and how they are perceived. I believe that the best and sometimes the correct ideas usually float to the top. Whether an artist is “talking shit” or whatever their state of mind, we all have our own series of ideas about hip-hop and sometimes one of those ideas needs to be that the messages are not always permanent ideas. Like it or not, they have a place in history whether they be pivotal or insignificant in the conscious or subconscious. Blaming hip-hop or even the Real Housewives of (Name City of your choice) is exactly why you shouldn’t let the media raise or teach your kids. Maybe Nelson should have suggested that parents show their kids the context of some of this music and possibly show them that it’s not a full version of reality if it’s reality at all.
On a more indirect note, I feel as if Nelson blames hip-hop in the preface/introduction of the book. In one paragraph she talks about black women being in denial about our problems, particularly young single women. In so many words she says, “If you think you’re young, single, and happy, think again because one day you’ll be older and wish you had a man… and if you still don’t think so, you’re probably the type of woman who thinks being called a bitch is a compliment.” WOW. Considering the idea of “bitch as a compliment” comes from hip-hop, or is at least highlighted by it, I’d say this is a big fat, insulting generalization.
There are also other generational factors that she ignores in the areas of relationships/motherhood/love. My generation has been raised by single mothers or may be single mothers themselves in some cases but I think that somewhere in our lives, we’ve seen that the idea of marriage and relationships isn’t all it’s cracked up to be. We’ve seen whatever aggravations our mothers, aunts, and grandmothers have been through and simply said, “Nah, I’ll pass.” We know that is takes work and we haven’t quite figured out what kind of balance we want so we marry later if at all, have kids later if at all. Throughout the book I found it so odd that she has so much to say about marriage being a woman’s manifested destiny when Nelson herself is not married. She seems to be trying to save younger generations of black women some grief but her solution to this problem is excessive planning. At that point, despite her excessive, cavalier, and very annoying use of the word “sister”, Nelson does not sound like a “sister”. Her tone/voice either reads as if she's making a speech on a podium or she sounds as if she's trying to forcibly relate to someone. She sounds like a mother hen who isn’t really listening to what her daughter may want. In all of this future planning Nelson wants us to do, there seems to be such little room for romantic (or erotic) fun and spontaneity.
Nelson seems to be very direct about her thoughts on the black family dynamic, the rest of the book is more about nothing.
Not religious? Atheist? Agnostic? Not Christian in general? I wouldn’t recommend this book for you.
LGBTQ? You’ve just adapted to the lack of men and I wouldn’t recommend this book for you either.
Her research doesn’t seem to go very deep and I wish I could know what geographical areas she got her survey participants from so that there could be a further discussion about values in different areas. I also found that she had a very small pool for a national survey which only furthered my doubts.
It’s not that I don’t think that anyone would find this book useful. It’s just not for me.