This first American edition of collected true-crime pieces from the '50s and '60s by the master author of Epitaph for a Spy, Journey Into Fear, The Light of Day et al. belongs on every fan's bookshelves. Ambler's polite, leisurely stroll down memory lane is a delight. He deals with classic villains from England (Jack the Ripper), Scotland (William Burke and William Hare) and France (Marcel Petiot) along with more recent miscreants: England's James Hanratty (1961) and America's Raymond Finch and Carole Tregoff (1960). Ambler also turns his good-natured, sharp eye on film-writing and the pleasures of Maxim's, and there are lovely semifictional pieces on spies and spy-spotting. Especially delicious is the tale of "Annettee" in 1937 Tangier. There's nothing heavy here, and even Ambler's opposition to the death penalty is quietly posited. His new introduction has its share of graceful nuggets, too.
Suspense novels of noted English writer Eric Ambler include Passage of Arms (1959).
Eric Ambler began his career in the early 1930s and quickly established a reputation as a thriller of extraordinary depth and originality. People often credit him as the inventor of the modern political thriller, and John Le Carré once described him as "the source on which we all draw."
Ambler began his working life at an engineering firm and then at an advertising agency and meanwhile in his spare time worked on his ambition, plays. He first published in 1936 and turned full-time as his reputation. During the war, people seconded him to the film unit of the Army, where he among other projects authored The Way Ahead with Peter Ustinov.
He moved to Hollywood in 1957 and during eleven years to 1968 scripted some memorable films, A Night to Remember and The Cruel Sea, which won him an Oscar nomination.
In a career, spanning more than six decades, Eric Ambler authored 19 books, the crime writers' association awarded him its gold dagger award in 1960. Joan Harrison married him and co-wrote many screenplays of Alfred Hitchcock, who in fact organized their wedding.
I go nutz over a good mystery or spy story. Eric Ambler served up both for decades. Spies: On the Simplon-Orient Express - take note, he says, of those who have no prob w passports/customs: "Those are the spies." Spy spots? Istanbul, Tangiers, Bangkok, the Ile du Levant were once keen. As for the gentle art of murder, Ambler details the 1960 Covina, Ca., case of Dr Finch & Carole Tregoff who were accused of killing the MDs wife. The trial involved lust, greed, hired killers. A circus ensued. Ambler, asked to do an article, says LA made the most of it, as it usually does w murder. Are the two alive today? They went to jail for life. The Finch-Tregoff saga is juicy movie material.
Ambler offers acidic comments on the dopey press. Of the '50s, he recalls: "One of the reasons why McCarthy was able so rapidly and so easily to lie his way to power was that everything he said was faithfully reported." An American reporter feels obliged to report what someone has said - even if he knows that it is a lie, Ambler adds with concern. It's up to the reader to decide for himself. NYT shrugged off the issue. The NYer countered, he tells us, "That's rather like saying if a restaurant serves poisoned food, it's up to the diner to refuse it." (I think of this today when absurdists like Ann Coulter get air-time).
Ambler includes an off-topic commentary on writing for the movies. (He wrote scripts and late-life married Hitchcock associate Joan Harrison). Between scripter and his audience are producer, director, actors, photographer, film editor and sound engineer. The resultant hurly-burly is a conflict of egos and interests, notes Ambler, who's so damned erudite that he makes you almost like what he calls the "aberrant minority." Lo, they're always with us.
I thought the historic murder cases were interesting and the sections on England, France and Scotland especially the Scottish verdict of not proven.
The book kicks off with a introduction of murders in England. The 1959 murder by a Dr Finch and his mistress Miss Tregoff of Finch’s wife is bizarre. He shoots her in the back and on the third trial is finally convicted and is out in 10 years. The sheer incompetence of the police, prosecution and juries is breathtaking. Talk about a circus.
The author discusses several other murders and the use of insanity as a defense. The Lizzie Borden Memorial Lectures cover England, Scotland where poisoning appears to be the preferred method and France where the murderers are guillotined. The crime of passion defense also appears only to work for women.
The last section discusses spy haunts of the world and how to spot a spy. Maxims the restaurant innParis and its history as well as how novelists struggles to turn there novels into film scripts.
An interesting book and gruesome descriptions of the murderers and their poor victims. The doctor in Paris killing 65 people trying to escape Nazi persecution was particularly evil and horrible.
Essay collections by well-regarded novelists frequently fail to live up to expectations, but The Ability to Kill possesses many of the same virtues as Ambler's novels. His non-fiction proves informative and revealing; his prose is equally dazzling as it is during his fiction. The first section features accounts of curious murder trials told from a reporter's perspective. Section two attempts to analyze murder based on definable national characteristics (e.g. the Scots prefer poison). Only the final section lacks thematic consistency, but it contains one of the book's highlights, an expose on the hobby of international "spy-spotting." A must read for Amblophiles!
Ambler, the great novelist, writes several true crime essays, all told with a sly sense of humor. His writing reminds me of Dominick Dunne. Although Ambler wrote first; perhaps Ambler did influence Dunne.
Includes a few other essays on travel, espionage, and being a writer in Hollywood.
Ladies and gentlemen, our Anglo-Saxon culture is built on studious denials of the existence within us of the primitive.
His essay on catching spies includes a sort of score chart for assessing the likelihood a person is a spy. This chart made me think of Circle of Treason, which recounts how the CIA finally caught Aldrich Ames after he'd been getting away with espionage at the highest level for years. The counterintelligence effort began with a secret vote among the spy catchers, in which they wrote down who they suspected might be the spy — most of the group thought Ames, but without proof. They either had access to a chart like the one Ambler presents here, or they may have internalized it.
In his essay on working as a writer in Hollywood, he advises that the key to maintaining one's self-respect while working in a medium that demands collaboration calls for maturity, not only for the writer but for everyone working in the medium.
I'm afraid to say I'm one of those people who is fascinated with murderers, more specifically, serial killers. Whilst researching something else, I came across a blog which recommended reading this book. I must stress right now that I won't be recommending the blog either.
Having now tapped out at 54%, it's taken me 3 months to haul my interest this far. Bear in mind here that I can, and have, read an entire 4 book series over a weekend, so I am no slouch when it comes to devouring the written word. However, Ambler's attempt at documenting such a favourite topic of mine is truly shocking. His writing style is long, drawn out, and quite frankly, utterly boring. He spends more time relaying history of countries rather than the nitty-gritty details I love to gawp at.
After finally reaching chapter 4, I felt hope at seeing the chapter titled 'London' - I am a native Brit, and proud of it. Yet, the straw that broke my waning perseverance was when he wrote of our 'President'.
Eric Ambler is a good writer, but The Ability to Kill does him no particular credit. Addressing true-crime, Ambler seemed more interested in the “crime” component than the “true” element, at least in the case I know something about (Finch). This decades-old book was written before we all became accustomed to reading accounts of well-known crimes by very good writers (Capote, Mailer, Toobin, Dunne, and many others), and if nothing else it illustrates the progress in the genre, and might interest true-crime buffs for that reason if for no other.
The first 60% of the book is true crime. That part was fairly interesting. HOWEVER, the last 40% was about a restaurant in Paris, a man who invented the motion picture camera and the last, disputes between writers and Hollywood producers. It was like his editor called and said, say, there's not enough for a book here, so just send me some essays and we will cobble them together. It was ODD.