I am publisher and editor of the Duke & Duchess of Windsor Quarterly. I wrote the following review for our most recent issue (2-2009):
NEXT OF KIN by John Boyne is a literary thriller set in London in 1936 amidst the unfolding crisis over King Edward VIII and Mrs. Simpson. This is a first rate novel that kept me in suspense every single moment and had me enthralled with its use of the abdication as its central story.
Society members who enjoy reading fiction will love this book which is a very clever story within several stories, with the abdication crisis at the center of a fascinating drama with very interesting and fully developed cast of characters. The Windsors themselves appear only once in a very brief cameo appearance.
The book's wrapper notes gives us a hint:
It is 1936, and London is abuzz with gossip about the affair between King Edward VIII and Mrs. Simpson. Owen Montignac, the handsome and charismatic scion of a wealthy family, is anxiously awaiting the reading of his late uncle’s will. He must pay £50,000 worth of gambling debts by Christmas or he’ll soon find himself six feet under. In his desperation, he discovers that the royal scandal could provide the means for profit…and for murder.
What Boyne accomplishes, and quite impressively I might add, is to interweave various thematic messages or allegories among the various plotlines throughout the novel.
What Boyne also does quite effectively, and Society Members will be pleasantly surprised, is portray the abdication crisis and all of the various facets of public and private opinion of all classes of British Society. Mr. Boyne has obviously read some informative books about King Edward VIII. Even though this is a work of fiction, I think that Mr. Boyne has accurately reflected the history of the abdication in a balanced and thoughtful way. Unlike other recent thrillers which featured a leather-wearing, whip-snapping Mrs. Simpson as a dominatrix,
NEXT OF KIN portrays both the King and Mrs. Simpson, and a few of the key government officials in an historically accurate way.
The novel involves a committee of select expert lawyers who are brought together to develop recommendations for Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin regarding handling of the abdication. Through this committee, as well as various characters in the book, we see a full spectrum of what people thought at the time about the King's affair with Mrs. Simpson. This is historical fiction, I remind you. That genre (and several non-fiction books, in my opinion, that were written as biographies of the Windsors should be classified as historical fiction) is a very difficult category to work in and not many writers effectively manage to find the right balance of historical fact within their artistic license with fiction. Fortunately, John Boyne gives an excellent example of historical fiction at its very best.
Many of the main characters, who are in their twenties, and the conflicts they endure represent the shift in British society from the old ways of the Edwardian and Victorian eras. That theme is very much a part of this book, the divergence from the old ways and the conflicts involved. And, of course, we know that Edward, Prince of Wales, was a chief instigator of change. Boyne’s novel even suggests that this is essentially the reason for Edward’s abdication, not his infamous mistress, Mrs. Simpson. 1936 was, after all, the year of three kings. In the book (as in reality), King Edward VIII seems to represent everything about a new generation and a beginning in a shift of collective consciousness. One of the book’s characters who is on the abdication committee, Lord Keaton, says:
‘Personally I couldn’t care less if the king wanted to marry a donkey. It doesn’t make a blind bit of difference to me. But the man has a way about him that has to be stopped. All this business with the miners in the North-East. The little visits he makes. This nonsense of ‘something has to be done.’ He thinks the monarchy is there to be shared with the people. He understands nothing about our ways. It’s as simple as that. But Baldwin….now he understands. He can see the damage the man is doing.’
The following discussion in the novel also illuminates a number of interesting issues/concepts especially related to the abdication of Edward VIII. One of our members recently pointed out that the morganatic marriage option is essentially what Edward finally ended up with, only crownless. (Ironically, it is also essentially what his successor, Prince Charles, was allowed to do in taking his second wife, the divorced Camilla Parker Bowles, and who was not required to sacrifice his crown.)
'The king proposes that he and Mrs. Simpson marry but that their marriage be a morganatic one—…A morganatic marriage,’ repeated Monckton. ‘Whereby the issue of the marriage would not be in line for the throne.’
'Good God,’ said Keaton. ‘She’s not pregnant, is she?’
'No she’s not,’ said Monckton quickly and angrily. ‘And let us remember that we are discussing the king here and that some level of decorum needs to be maintained. As I was saying, the issue, should there be any,’ he added loudly, ‘would not be in line for the throne. After the king’s death, the throne would pass to the Duke of York or, should he predecease him, to the Princess Elizabeth.’
'He can’t be serious,’ said Altringham.
'He’s perfectly serious,’ said Monckton, sitting back. ‘And it seems a perfectly fair proposal if you ask me.’
'It would satisfy both sides of the debate,’ said Roderick, nodding his head. ‘And Mrs. Simpson. What title would she expect?’
'She would be willing to reject the title of queen, instead she could use the consort equivalent of one of the king’s other titles. The Duchess of Cornwall is the preferred option.’
I was fascinated with the main characters of the book. They all exhibit some sort of serious flaws as humans but I was still sympathetic to them, even perhaps the most flawed of them all, the protagonist Owen Montignac. The characters often do rather horrible things to each other and yet you somehow understand what motivated them or how they found themselves doing the things they were doing.
The cameo appearance by King Edward VIII and Mrs. Simpson, both central characters to the central plotline in NEXT OF KIN, occurs about two-thirds of the way through the book. It is an intimate meeting between Owen Montignac and the King and Mrs. Simpson at a gambling bar in London the night before the abdication:
The guests laughed and Montignac watches as Mrs. Simpson laid a hand gently on the king’s arm, an affectionate gesture, entirely truthful and unpossessive, and the manner in which he used his other hand to tap hers affectionately while she did it. He observed them in their intimacy and envied them.
It is in this scene that I encountered the only instance (that I could find) of the author’s artistic license at hand with the actual circumstances that occurred. As Society Members know, Mrs. Simpson was sequestered in France for many days leading up to the abdication. This scene has Mrs. Simpson in London the night prior to the abdication. But that is the fun of historical fiction…the writer has the ability to create scenes which could not have occurred. In this case, Boyne does so and provides us with a wonderful sympathetic portrayal of the King and Mrs. Simpson.
Boyne’s book is just so very clever and I was constantly in awe of the author’s ability to continue to weave recurring themes into so many different plotlines (e.g., birthright, definition of a family). My copy of NEXT OF KIN looks like some college textbook with dogeared edges and highlighted paragraphs on so many pages.
I strongly recommend this book. It is a very intelligent and exciting read, whether you are a Windsor-phile or not. But for those of you that are, I’ll leave you with this final excerpt of why you’ll be thrilled to read this book (for so many reasons) and you won’t want to miss NEXT OF KIN:
In Buckingham Palace, King Edward VIII slept alone but lay awake now, his mind torn by the twin tortures of duty and love. He didn’t know why he wasn’t simply allowed to do as he pleased—no one had ever denied him anything before—and he thought of his late father’s prophetic words that after he was gone, his heir would destroy himself within a twelve-month. But he knew what he wanted and he knew who he could not live without. And if that meant giving up the throne, his own birthright, then so be it. But he would wait no longer to be married. They had plagued him for so many years to take a wife and now that he had chosen one, they claimed that she was unacceptable. The whole thing was a ridiculous irony.