First, booty from introduction by Gammel and Zelazo:
“The Baronness is the first American Dada.”—Jane Heap, 1920
“Delirious in its ragged edges and atonal rhythms, the poetry echoes the noise of the metropolis itself. Profanity sounds loudly throughout her poems…
“Our consciousness is captured not only by the baffling simultaneity of heterogeneous materials but by the ongoing transformation of the self. […] Fusing, braiding, mixing, and crossing are at the heart of the Baroness’s poetry […]surreal hybridity
“In her introduction to the Bad Girls exhibit of radical feminist artists at the New Museum of Contemporary Art in 1994, Marcia Tucker identifies the subversive power of the female joke, which ‘challenges traditional role models, defies stereotypes, is seductive, inclusive and, most important, is based on the idea that any and all systems of exploitation, not just those that exploit women, can and must be changed for the better.’ Through her humor, the Baroness could own her cultural criticism. She is, after all, often laughing at herself. Naumann confirms that for New York Dada, ‘humor is the most salient, consistent, and powerful operating factor behind the creation of all great Dada artifacts.’”—IG+SZ
“Long ago when I was young I asked Marcel Duchamp, ‘Would you call the Baroness a Futurist or Dadaist?’ He replied, ‘She is not a Futurist. She is the future.’”—Kenneth Rexroth
“By the late twentieth century, our time, a mythic time, we are all chimeras, theorized and fabricated hybrids of machine and organism; in short we are cyborg.”—Donna Haraway
Poems that secrete, fume, flounce, cuss, defy, subvert, electrify, seduce, short-circuit, crackle, queef. Poems of the “Electric heart - / Panicky soul - / Carrionfeeding spiritcannibal - / Gory roisterer - / Redsmoky wastrel - / Reeking eternity bacchant” (170). But not just poems—performance, persona, intervention, a general lived exuberant contrariness meeting the sacred with the profane and anxiety with sensuous lustre and humor. Why has it taken so long—close to a century since their creation—for the collected and uncensored works of The Baroness Else Von Freytag-Loringhoven to appear? This lag in fruition is enough commentary on the instituion of poetry in the U.S. to underwrite evidence of its drawn-out hospice. The Baroness rises from its little corpse, Amazonian zombie with headdress, shooting electric rays of lust from her eyeballs and flames from her ass.
Some poems that drill in slender spirals (drill-bit form) through the strata of heteronormativity—thin, spondee-driven, at times bark-like, things that arrive at something aggressive, swooshy, and simultaneously insouciant., glinting. For example, “To Whom it May Concern”:
Glean
Whip of
Hair –
Queu swish of
Racing Mare –
Love’s spontaneous
Gesture.
Tilt
Spine
Back
Deep –
Hurt –
That –
Loves –
In:
Hate cool
Subtle mistrust
Vast pleasure
Of
Equal measure.
A kind of sonnet that cums in the middle. A physiological map of the god-self being eclipsed by animal-self and the near ineffability of orgasm, only to return to the human at a bare emotional state of “subtle mistrust”—the symbiosis of a coitus subverting the dominant-submissive binary in favor of equal pleasure.
“In 1910, on arrival from Berlin, [the Baroness] was promptly arrested for promenading on Pittsburgh’s Fifth Avenue dressed in a man’s suit and smoking a cigarette.”—IG=SZ
In “A Dozen Cocktails—Please” and at a point of total exasperation with her place and time (“What is the dread / Matter with the up-to-date-American- / Home-comforts?”) and a focus on lonely personal comforts (“There’s the vibrator----- -- / Coy flappertoy! I am adult citizen with / Vote—I demand my unstinted share / In roofeden—witchsabbath of our Baby- / Lonian obelisk.”) the Baroness offers an imperative for her poetics:
Say it with-- -- --
Bolts!
Oh thunder!
Serpentine aircurrents -- -- --
Hhhhhphssssssss! The very word penetrates!
In “Coming to Writing” (with sexual connotations in the translated title the Baroness would approve), Hélène Cixous:
In the beginning , I adored. What I adored was human. Not persons; not totalities, not defined and named beings. But signs. Flashes of being that glanced off me, kindling me. Lightning-like bursts that came to me: Look! (Cixous 1)
These signs, in the Baroness’s hands, are dismembered, licked, reattached—some stick together (“saucerorbs,” “ghosttree,” “quiltbeggarskirt”), some are re-severed with Dickenson axe effect, such as the opening of “Ancestry”: “Dad was corkscrew--/ Bottle fair ma-- -- -- -- -- --“ (51). That “ma” might be a mother or it might be the remnants of something else: maiden, matriarch, march-hare, mammal. These M-dashes signal disruptions in frequencies, changes in signals, but they also effect a kind of violence and failure of the word, seeming like a corporeal, pre-language takeover in the poem. Back to “A Dozen Cocktails”: “…I am entitled / To be deeply shocked.” Lifting signs from advertising-rhetoric, radio-talk, street conversation, and re-creating the mundane in a highly charged, hysterical (all connotations granted free entry) ars poetica, the Baroness creates a poetic space that is flashing, restless, and of the female body.
What is the generative mind-state at work here? She lets us know in “Lofty Logic”:
Thou art not acquainted
With thineself before thou not
Experienced feeling of tender
Affection towards thine excrements.
Hast reached that station in
Existence – art elevated
Lonely king – spirit – sun.
That logic. (169)
This hilarious riff on Shakespeare’s “To thine ownself be true” merges antiquated address with the scattalogical, the sacred with the profane, in a logic in which the profane is sacred. Perhaps this ecstatic merger of the holy and the hole-y is the biggest thing for me. She can be my mama. Here are my chromosomes: “Analytical Chemistry of Progeny”: “I am—gleaming fruit at the tree top / Fulfilment—brilliant design / Of a thousand-year-old marriage manure / Genius—idiocy—filth—purity” (40).