What do you think?
Rate this book


616 pages, Paperback
First published May 1, 1993
Everyone has different methods of study when it comes to exams. Knowing that I planned to take the National Counselor Examination (NCE) in November (2018), during the summer I perused the entirety of the NBCC website in search of ideas on how best to prepare. My solution was simple. I decided to pay the $34.95 and ordered a copy of the NCE preparation guide. Much to my amazement, this flimsy little guide arrived and provided little help – other than an awesome annotated bibliography – in my preparations. Fortunately, I discussed my imbroglio with mentors and peers and ended up getting a copy of the Encyclopedia of Counseling. This fit – exactly – both my preferred method of study and the delivery system (reading) I was used to.
Over the course of two months, I studied both the Encyclopedia of Counseling and listened to Dr. Rosenthal’s tapes simultaneously. The result? First, I would like to offer a reflection on the entire process of studying for the NCC:
Well, it is done. At the end of the test, you get a printout that shows your score for each of the eight CACREP and the five counselor work areas. Additionally, you get the overall raw score. At first glance, it is hard to make any meaning out of this information. While I did not get a perfect 160 out of 160, I am fairly confident, based on my research, that I passed. After the test was over, I immediately started to reflect on both my experience of the test and my preparation methods.
In consideration of my preparation methods, I realized that although I had (1) read the Encyclopedia of Counseling thoroughly; (2) taken multiple practice tests; and, (3) devoted a strict schedule to studying; nothing that I studied directly answered the questions on the actual NCE. At first, this was intimidating. I really thought that it would just be a case of memorization of test questions and then picking out the appropriate answer. However, the actual NCE had some questions that were (1) poorly phrased; (2) decision based – that is, the best possible answer of more than one right answer; and, (3) all of the areas were jumbled together.
During the test, I thought about the above situation and how much stress that would put on someone. While the theory or intent of the questions were similar to those I studied, the actual wording was vastly different. Additionally, the fact that other people were present for a variety of tests (and unprepared, not having required i.d., confused about procedures, projecting their own stress onto others) could definitely have an impact on one’s own level of anxiety. Fortunately, I was able to consider the above information, at the moment, and actually, use that reflection as a way to counter any anxiety that I may have experienced.
Overall, I thought that my strategy for preparation was effective. While I would have loved to be able to immediately answer every question (there were a few that I had to seriously think about before answering), I think that the process of studying, taking practice exams, reading the Encyclopedia of Counseling, and listening to the audio tapes, were effective.
Nonetheless, I do think there are areas for improvement. Specifically, I think I could have (1) spent more time reading the works of the author’s mentioned in the exam (particularly the career development author’s); (2) Spent more time practicing in an environment that matched the testing environment better (to include the time, silence, and input of an extraneous variable [i.e., the other tester’s projection of anxiety]); and, (3) group study – this is the most salient point of my reflection. It seemed that people were unwilling to study as part of a group and opted to go it alone. While I see the benefit of this, I also see the need to interact with others and discuss difficult concepts, or areas, that you might not be conceptualizing correctly. I really wished I could somehow have convinced others in my cohort to study with me.
Overall, I am excited to now focus on the Certified Rehabilitation Counselor (CRC) examination I have coming up in May and try and use the above suggestions for improvement in preparing for that exam. I tend to look at aptitude testing more as a celebration of academic achievement rather than a requirement or gotcha type event. I am satisfied with my achievement, but also think that I have much to learn in the field of counseling. The types of test let me know that I am on the right track and help me focus on areas I may not have realized that I have not researched enough. For this I am grateful.
This week (December 17, 2018), I received the actual scores from the exam. Not only did I pass, but I was also two standard deviations above the mean. While I cannot say that the questions were in any way the same as those in the Encyclopedia of Counseling, I can say that the method Rosenthal uses helped me to better conceptualized each question and determine the most appropriate answer. Therefore, I recommend this book for those seeking certification.
Good luck to everyone and may the odds forever be in your favor!