This is a real page turner, a thoroughly enjoyable and gripping historical novel describing the struggles of the Eastern Roman Empire during the period of the Emperor Valens (who became co-Augustus together with his brother Valentinian in AD 364, and who then assumed the senior Augustus role in AD 375, over his nephew Gratian in the west, at the death of his brother).
This novel is therefore set in a fascinating period often neglected by many writers of popular historical novels, who tend to focus primarily on the late Republic and early Principate era.
And this is quite refreshing: I am a bit tired of coming across novels about Julius Caesar, Cleopatra, Augustus and the likes.
We are dealing in particular with the period immediately preceding the defeat at the infamous Battle of Hadrianopolis (9 August AD 378, disastrous battle when Valens himself perished in the battle). This event used to be considered a watershed in the Late Empire history. While the criticality of this battle has been significantly revised by some modern historians, it still represents a significant shift in the nature of the relationship of the Roman Empire with the barbarian tribes pressing on its borders.
The main story is in the year 376, when significant pressure is being exerted on the borders of the Roman Empire, in particular by the various Goth tribes, which are themselves being pressured by the advancing Huns. And, to compound this external pressure, conspiracies against the Emperor do not fail to periodically come to light.
The main character, Pavo, plays an increasingly critical role in helping the Empire deal with some of these internal and external threats.
OK, let me now shift focus and summarize instead the main features of this novel.
On the positive side:
- the plot is complex and very well-constructed, with twists and cliffhangers. Yes there are a couple of events and characters requiring some suspension of disbelief, but overall the plot is consistent, credible, fast paced and a real page turner
- the settings (in particular the Bosporus region) are beautifully described, and quite evocative
- some of the battles (especially the final confrontation with the Huns) are epic and memorable. Moreover, the author does not fall into the common mistake of considering the Late Roman army just a shadow of the High Empire army: mainstream historians agree that the fighting capabilities of the Late Roman army were generally on a par with the army of the High Empire period.
- this book successfully achieves an almost optimal compromise between historical accuracy on one side, and the necessity for the author, on the other side, to develop a gripping story which would be appealing to a relatively wide audience. Moreover, this book has a very helpful introductory part with a glossary of Latin terms, a description of the structure of the typical Late Roman Legion, some notes about the religious aspects of the empire, etc. This is very helpful, especially considering that the Late Roman army differed significantly to the typical High Empire army.
- some characters (in particular the Centurion Brutus, but also Centurion Gallus and Optio Flex) are very well defined and quite memorable. Unfortunately the main character is occasionally a bit too cheesy for my tastes, but he is overall credible enough
- the writing style and the overall story clearly reflect the passion of the author for history in general, and late Roman history in particular, and also his knowledge and competence. The author has clearly done his research thoroughly and, because of this, the reader gets strong insights into this fascinating historical period, while being entertained
On the not-so-positive side:
- as also commented by another reviewer, the author makes the control of battles just a bit too easy and clean. Ancient battles were a very messy and confusing affair, and even for the legendary discipline and organization of the legions it was very difficult for commanders to achieve the type of almost immediate control of the stance and formation of thousands of men that is implied by the author. In particular, once the real battle started, the actual control was more decentralized down to century level.
- some of the characters (like the Bishop Evagrius) are a bit too black and white and they lack in complexity, and therefore they lack in credibility – the author could have developed them in a much more nuanced manner
- there are a couple of terms that sort of annoyed me, like “runt” and “bugger”, and sometimes the dialogs verge a bit too much on the modern colloquial lingo side for my personal tastes.
But it must be said that the positive aspects way outweigh the few negatives.
Overall, this is a very, very enjoyable read, highly recommended to anybody interested in Late Roman history. It is one of the best historical novels I have read for quite some time.
I would consider it a 4.5 star book, but I am giving it a 5 star rating as I think that a young, enthusiastic and competent writer of Late Roman history, who clearly has a passion for history and who has done serious research into the historical background of his novel, should be rewarded and encouraged.
I loved this book, which is the first of a series, and I am now starting with the second one straight away... it seems a very promising series.