The author of Gods Right Hand, Michael Sean Winters, is not forthcoming about his biases and it impacts the information presented in the book. He clearly has done his research (albeit apparently largely from Jerry Falwell’s own books), but he completely bungles the discussion of the moral majority’s stance on abortion and race and does not adequately fact check falwells claims about himself and his work.
He makes little to no mention of the fact that the southern Baptist convention (SBC) (of which, in fairness, Falwell was not a part) was fine with abortion throughout the 70s, and only "came to recognize it as a social ill" in the run up to the 1980 elections.
This, conveniently, happened at the same time that segregation academies (private "Christian schools" founded to ensure that white children would not have to attend integrated public schools) - a fight that the SBC was deeply concerned about, but faced an uphill PR battle on - looked to be heading to the Supreme Court (SCOTUS) in 1981 in "Bob Jones University v. United States." The author even mentions the segregation academies, albeit opaquely, in chapter nine when discussing Falwells beliefs on the first amendment. Yet he does not interrogate the matter further ? Bizarre.
Winters doesn’t seem to think that Falwells public work had any racist or discriminatory overtones despite discussing school privatization a page earlier (again without mentioning segregation academies - loc 3652). He mentions the "BJU v. United States" but completely glosses over it. Winters merely quotes Falwell as saying that SCOTUS just ruled against BJU because SCOTUS didn’t like them (rather than because BJU was racist and violating the constitution) (loc 3652) and does not investigate Falwells claim any further. Taking this claim at face value amounts to lazy research at best, and an endorsement of Falwell’s racist beliefs at worst.
The epilogue is patently ridiculous, touting how kind and respectful Falwell was to people he disagreed with- after an entire book discussing his decades-long, ardent work to disenfranchise and discriminate against people who weren’t white, straight, male, and right wing. He claims that Falwell didn’t "indulge in vulgar personal attacks" but rather "demonized… in the abstract" (loc 6586). Hillary Clinton would beg to differ.
In short - this book is very poorly researched. It’s not a question of agreeing or disagreeing with Winters on issues of racial discrimination or abortion; winters seriously bungled a fundamental tenet of falwells work with the Moral Majority by failing to adequately investigate falwells own claims about himself.
Several pieces of miscellany: Winters compares IVF to Auschwitz which is objectionable in the extreme (p 214 on the kindle app), and reveals a complete ignorance of international affairs when he refers to Saudi Arabia as a "moderate Muslim country" (loc 6515).