Racism, whorephobia, homophobia, cliches, right-wing bias, unrealistically precocious children, creepy, rapey men, and a heroine who outdoes all the others in heartlessness. This book has everything I hate about Iris Johansen's writing.
Catherine Ling is a 29-year-old woman who works for the CIA. She grew up on the streets of Hong Kong, but never turned to sex work because she was "too smart." Instead, she dealt in information. This book tells the story of her relationship with Hu Chang, an apothecary who produces both medicine and deadly poisons. Although he's not out to seduce her, he took a liking to her when she was fourteen and decided to act just as creepy as if her were out to seduce (or rape, because that's what it would be) her. I admit, he was actually more interesting than Johansen's other characters, because he did keep me guessing. But, ultimately, he was a major asshole, too.
I could not sympathize with Catherine at all, even when she was a child. She had a "friend," Lucy Tain, who was a year younger than her and was already a sex worker. Catherine is a total asshole about this, saying that Lucy's stupid and cowardly and could get out of her situation if she really worked at it. And this is all after Lucy was murdered. Jesus Christ, at thirteen, a child can't consent to sex. She wasn't "stupid," she was being repeatedly raped! And her father was her "pimp"! How, exactly, could she "work" her way out of that? And what should she do, become competition for Catherine in gathering and selling information?
Nonetheless, I wanted Catherine's flashback to continue for as long as possible, since it meant that John Gallo wouldn't show up. And he didn't show up until page 141, so there's that. If you're dying to read any interactions between him and Catherine, go ahead and skip the 140 pages.
Gallo shows up all of a sudden in her hotel room, and it goes downhill from there. Gallo isn't taking any resistance from Catherine. Oh, he says he won't do anything to her until she lets him, but he's constantly saying things to her that would get him arrested for sexual harassment in real life. Yes, I know women aren't always believed, but he constantly says this stuff, and honestly? If anyone called him out on it, he would probably admit to it.
Can I add how sick I am of everyone saying they're selfish? And then expecting people to be surprised? And then using this excuse for everything they can do? This doesn't make a main character likable. I know flaws are important, but it's really not that interesting if every member of the cast has the same flaw (usually segregated by gender). The men giggle at their own selfishness, cruelty, and rapey-ness so we can all applaud them for being "honest." The women growl and grump all the time and refuse to let anyone do anything for them, but they always give in in the end because Strong Female Characters aren't supposed to actually stop the men in their lives from taking charge and ignoring their autonomy.
Occasionally, they'll mumble about "sexism" or whatever, but then they tell themselves to just "deal with it." Now that's a defense mechanism if I've ever heard of one. It really makes me wonder how Iris Johansen knows rape culture so intimately. She doesn't necessarily have to be a victim of abuse; she's probably just read romance novels like this all her life.
Also, men? Stop fondling the heroines' throats. That's not sexy, that's terrifying.
I spent another one of her novels just wishing the heroine and love interest would have sex so I wouldn't have to endure this "Will they or won't they" crap. We all know how it's going to end sooner or later.
Sometimes I get mad when the women needlessly risk their lives and get involved in plots where their involvement could screw everything up. That's not the case with Catherine Ling. She's actually a trained assassin and agent, so she actually knows what she's doing. And I was super mad when the men insisted on moving around behind her back to keep her "safe." Unlike the heroine of the last Johansen novel I read, she was smart and had useful skills. By the end of the book, I wished she would shoot both Gallo and Hu Chang.
Oh, the racism? Yeah. There's a lot of objectification of Asian--specifically Chinese--people present. Catherine herself is a quarter Russian, a quarter Korean, and half-white. Hu Chang's eyes are described as being less "slanted" than other Chinese people's. And one character, Chen Lu, is Irish, but similarly Irish husband told her that her real name, Margaret, wasn't "magical" enough, and gave her a different name.
Luke and Kelly are obnoxious and bratty kids who think they shouldn't be treated like kids. Kelly is worse because she's older. She tells Luke about the extra security around their house, because if she was in Luke's place, she wouldn't want to be treated like some "namby-pamby kid" who can't look after himself.
Kelly. HE IS A NAMBY-PAMBY KID. HE'S 11 YEARS OLD. I don't care if he was kidnapped by some evil crime lord at age 2 and constantly exposed to violence and death. And of course, Catherine, too, treats him like he's a tiny adult. Hu Chang goes a step forward and says that he's not a child at all.
No, Hu Chang. In the eyes of the law of every damn country on the planet, he's a child. It doesn't matter what kind of trauma he's been through, he still can't take care of himself. Even with a high IQ, he still doesn't know how the world works. Neither does Kelly, at that, but at fifteen years old, she should know better.
I would say I hope Kelly doesn't become the heroine of another series, but I'm almost done with Johansen, so who cares?
The plot is pretty predictable, but there's more evidence of Johansen's right-wing bias than in her other books. It was pretty tedious to sift through. There's a presidential election going on in the U.S., and the "good" candidate, William Andrews, wants to take America back to its 1776 roots and refuses to answer questions on social issues. You know, reproductive rights, LGBT+ rights, and all that silly stuff only evil politicians think are important. His opponent, on the other hand, wants to move the U.S. in the direction of a--GASP--global government! The horror! Imagine a world where we actually gave a crap about other countries and not just ourselves!
Here's a quote from the "good" candidate's assistant:
"I wanted this barbecue and debate to remind people of what it used to be like decades ago when an election could be Stars and Stripes and pure Americana."
Yeah, back in the good old days where women just smiled through their husbands' abuse, and we didn't have to be confronted with the fact people of color and LGBT+ people exist. Back when we were competing with Russia to see who could blow up the world first. Back when we executed people because maybe they were spies. We didn't know for sure, of course, but it certainly made us feel safer.
Also, this woman's supposed to be, like, 30. Whatever.
I also forgot to mention homophobia and biphobia. The villain is yet another bisexual. He also has a gay lover. We know he's gay because, unlike the big bad, he isn't interested in women, except as objects of torture, and even then, only if the big bad is lusting after them. So he's jealous of heterosexual women, desperate for approval from his boss/boyfriend, and, as we see later, a coward. I'm surprised she didn't give him a lips.
Then she has the nerve to do this:
"'Someone is watching me.'
"'Every man in the room who isn't blind or gay.'"
I will quote myself from Facebook.
NO, Iris Johansen. You do NOT get to make this joke when every single gay or bi person in your books--including this one--is a villain. You have "good guys" who are torturers and murderers, yet not a single one who is attracted to members of the same gender.
To combine a couple of your favorite words, "Screw you, dammit."
There's a "twist" at the end, but it was so dumb that I couldn't even appreciate that I didn't see it coming. It's very similar to the twist at the end of another book by hers that I read, which was only published 4 years before this one.
One more book, and then I'll be done with Iris Johansen. Hopefully forever.