I was torn between calling this book 'One Man's Journey into His Own Metabolism' - or 'Jeff O'Connell's Non-Unified Theory of Everything'.
Although O'Connell's research is interesting, & his stats on the dangers of diabetes (so prevalent it runs the risk of becoming disregarded except as a 'normal part of getting old') compelling, in the end I was left with two questions.
a) What really **is** the 'simple way' to beat diabetes? I've read the whole book & I'm not exactly sure.
And,
b) Who can I trust to help me?
O'Connell's best advice seems to be "trust no one". Not the health bodies, not your GP, not the other amateur metabolic sleuth he connects with late in the book. He does offer several complicated answers to beating diabetes - exercise & diet-based, though with so many personalised variations on both (did you know that if you DO have to eat carbs, you should make sure to combine them with fats? Never have a baked potato without sour cream and bacon, for example) that I was left with the conclusion that the only way to beat this thing is to undertake my own complicated investigation across a myriad of tests and doctors, to uncover the unique and personalised means to my own salvation.
And if it ends up being similar to O'Connell's - mini-meals every 2 hours, an extreme low-carb approach which most medical bodies would describe, apparently, as 'unhealthy', BUT with a couple of glasses of red wine allowable, somehow - then god help me.
I don't know, I kinda felt like O'Connell's approach was often ... convenient. Grab hold of the research that suits your conclusions, ignore the rest.
Still. I will be eating less carbs from now on...