After showing that sacramental realism exists in neither Ignatius nor in John 6:51b-58, Frederick G. Klawiter argues that Ignatius’ eucharist contained a sacrificial wine libation (poured into a dish on the altar), symbolizing the pouring out of Jesus’ blood in his sacrificial death. Then, by drinking from the libation cup in the eucharist/agape meal, Christians sought unity of agape with one another and the crucified, risen Jesus—while anticipating the possibility of martyrdom.
The understanding of martyrdom is critical in the understanding of Ignatius of Antioch. Due to passages in his Letter to the Ephesians 20; Letter to the Smyrnaens 3, and Letter to the Romans 2, 4, and 7, some feel that Ignatius is making himself to be a Eucharist sacrament or adding the significance of his death on to that of Jesus Christ.
Klawiter presents a clear argument for Ignatius's martyrdom being like a sacrificial libation. His view counters the prevailing sentiment of real presence in Ignatius's view of the Eucharist. His volume interacts with the passages from John 6 and their relationship to Ignatius's presentation. Klawiter knows the viewpoint that the elements present transubstantiation yet presents the viewpoint that Ignatius finds a general presence of the Lord at the taking of the elements but not in the elements themselves.
Thus, for his martyrdom, there is a spiritual significance to it. It is not on the same level of the death of Christ.