In this pathbreaking book one of America’s most distinguished philosophers brilliantly explores the status and authority of law and the nature of political allegiance through close readings of three classic Hollywood Westerns: Howard Hawks’ Red River and John Ford’s The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance and The Searchers. Robert Pippin treats these films as sophisticated mythic accounts of a key moment in American history: its “second founding,” or the western expansion. His central question concerns how these films explore classical problems in political psychology, especially how the virtues of a commercial republic gained some hold on individuals at a time when the heroic and martial virtues were so important. Westerns, Pippin shows, raise central questions about the difference between private violence and revenge and the state’s claim to a legitimate monopoly on violence, and they show how these claims come to be experienced and accepted or rejected. Pippin’s account of the best Hollywood Westerns brings this genre into the center of the tradition of political thought, and his readings raise questions about political psychology and the political passions that have been neglected in contemporary political thought in favor of a limited concern with the question of legitimacy.
Robert B. Pippin is the Evelyn Stefansson Nef Distinguished Service Professor in the Committee on Social Thought, the Department of Philosophy, and the College at the University of Chicago. He is the author of several books and articles on German idealism and later German philosophy, including Kant's Theory of Form; Hegel's Idealism: The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness; Modernism as a Philosophical Problem; and Idealism as Modernism: Hegelian Variations. In addition he has published on issues in political philosophy, theories of self-consciousness, the nature of conceptual change, and the problem of freedom. He also wrote a book about literature and philosophy: Henry James and Modern Moral Life. A collection of his essays in German, Die Verwirklichung der Freiheit, appeared in 2005, as did The Persistence of Subjectivity: On the Kantian Aftermath, and his book on Nietzsche, Nietzsche, moraliste français: La conception nietzschéenne d'une psychologie philosophique, appeared in 2006. Fatalism in American Film Noir: Some Cinematic Philosophy appeared in 2012. He was twice an Alexander von Humboldt fellow, is a winner of the Mellon Distinguished Achievement Award in the Humanities, and was recently a fellow at the Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin. He is a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and is a member of the American Philosophical Society. He is also a member of the German National Academy of Arts and Sciences.
My four stars guide the way to some sharp insights into specific films; Pippin is a close reader. On the larger issue of his political philosophy/psychology, the book left me less than clear. True, the American western movie does have a political dimension as many commentators have shown, but just how this works for Pippin does not crystallize for me. The western myth has perhaps been more clearly scrutinized in Richard Slotkin's work. Here we see three representative films as exploring the "founding" story. This founding appears to bring into tension the claims of community versus the individual, not a surprising idea. It also involves an imaginary that seems to need the confrontation of the know and the unknown, the family and that which is alien to the family. This raises the spectres of violence and racism. All this is well worth thinking about, and this is a worthy book.
An excellent overview of how the great classic Western directors examined and created the American myth. It starts off a bit academic but once it gets going it's very compelling.
El profesor Robert Pippin es el responsable de esta apasionante investigación sobre la influencia de Howard Hawks y John Ford (dos de los cineastas más grandes del Western estadounidense) en el pensamiento político norteamericano. Es un libro atractivo tanto como para académicos cuanto para el público en general.
A niche book for sure, but an important read, not just for philosophy, but for American films. Despite the dense subject matter, it was a quick read. However it often leaves you with more questions than answers. I recommend just for brevity and John Ford.