I skimmed the majority of this book, looking for the part that was different from traditional straight naturopathic theory--which was the bulk. I love, though, that different people from very different backgrounds came to the same ultimate conclusions about health: that if you remove the obstacles to cure and give the body the building blocks it needs to heal, then within reason, healing will occur. The twist was enzyme therapy, and I gathered the concept is that once the cancer cells are eradicated, the enzymes will go in and chew up the remaining dead tissue so that the body can resorb it... sort of like (pardon the analogy) maggots in a necrotic limb. I had never understood the concept behind why enzymes might be useful for cancer, and had been under the impression that the idea had been thoroughly debunked. But I wonder now whether that's actually true, or whether it's simply widely believed. Certainly the rest of his philosophy of health is dead on.