Although thankfully, David Shannon's No, David! does end in a conciliatory and affirmative enough manner (in so far that David's mother obviously loves her son even though he clearly is a proverbial holy terror most of the time), personally I have found No, David! not even remotely to my liking, to my reading tastes. For honestly, that ALL of Shannon’s scenarios of behaviour in No, David! present instances of young David negatively acting out and often massively so, this certainly has made No, David! rather monotonous and one-sided for me, as though ALL David can do is to basically just be a royal pain in the behind. And even the mother’s declaration that she still loves her son does not really make the one after another litany of David's many peccadilloes fun and interesting for me and in particular because No, David! is also just a list of David's bad behaviours with no explanations ever offered to him why, just a constant no, no, no, but never in fact giving David a real talking to about what is good and what is unacceptable, what is bad or problematic ways and manners of acting.
Combined with the fact that (and the Caldecott Honour designation David Shannon received for No, David! quite notwithstanding) I on a personal visual level also really do massively despise the accompanying illustrations (since yes indeed and albeit that Shannon's use of colour is bright and lively, I find David depicted in a visually totally repellant manner that makes him look creepy and in particular his teeth quite fang-like and perhaps even evil) I really cannot consider more than one star for No, David! and that yes indeed, this book has both been a massive disappointment and on a personal aesthetics level, that I also really do have trouble understanding why No, David! is a Caldecott Honour book (as for me, David Shannon’s illustrations actually do seem to render poor David into almost a monster).