I was pleased at the inclusion of some popular writers like Stephen King and Agatha Christie, but, dear God, there's a world of difference in quality between them and Anne Rice (I know people read her, I know she's popular, but I think she's terrible. She can't write plot that makes any damn sense). So now I'm second-guessing the whole list! I mean, Jonathan Livingstone Seagull was popular, but even Toibin wouldn't dare include it here. Perhaps you have gathered I really, really hate Anne Rice's writing.
As I continued through the list, I actually felt the problem was there are too many prize-winners, too many book-club books, that sort of thing, and less of the undiscovered classic (which is why I seek these kind of books in the first place). Where is the amazing genre fiction? Maybe my mother would finally condescend to read Fantasy or SF if it were in a list like this. Anne Rice, but not Ursula Leguin, or Diana Wynne Jones, or Gene Wolfe? The list is 95% realism, touching honest depictions of life in the South / or Australia / or a small town somewhere / or the big city / blah blah blah. There's more to the novel than that, for Pete's sake.
So yes, I've found some more people to read. But I was, overall, fairly disappointed. Giving a grudging 3 stars because of Agatha Christie and Stephen King, but, sigh, I'm probably going to be on my deathbed one day, crying out "Anne Rice?!?" and no one will understand why unless they've read this review.
(Note: I'm a writer, so I suffer when I offer fewer than five stars. But these aren't ratings of quality, they're a subjective account of how much I liked the book: 5* = an unalloyed pleasure from start to finish, 4* = really enjoyed it, 3* = readable but not thrilling, 2* = disappointing, and 1* = hated it.)