I have a huge interest in mid-management right now, and wanted to see what the book contributed to that end in today’s org.
It’s an ok read. Basically, execs need to share more power, clear the deck and remove superfluous tasks and responsibilities from mid-managers. Nothing too new there, though authors seem quite enthusiastic about it.
The irony of a bunch of McKinsey consultants now extolling the benefits of mid-managers (their usual target for cost reductions) is not lost. The authors try several times to explain why “it’s different now,'" though it does seem a bit opportunistic and disingenuous.
Full disclosure, I was a corp exec when a tribe of McKensey-ites recommended wholesale cuts across our "middle," and my arguments almost cost me my job.
Ok.
Most of the book speaks to the reason we need mid-managers is to help employees with their personal “purpose.” Though I agree that’s significant, I don’t know if it’s the do-all, end-all that the book describes. A bit disappointed to see a clear bias for some issues during the apocalypse. Not surprised, just...
The book has some decent stories and story-telling; sort of “behold the middle managers, the unsung pillars, relegated to a numerical pursuit under the guise of "cost-cutting."
Apparently, trimming costs and curbing middle managers' roles yielded some transient profit but begat enduring challenges.
The authors now realize that middle managers are the key for cultivating and fortifying a positive culture -- any culture -- today.
Clearly, after examining so many recent research studies (many offered herein), most employees ranked feeling appreciated or supported as either first or second priority. Middle managers are -- or can be -- best qualified and best situated to respond effectively to that need.
Decent read, a bit lengthy, little action-oriented. Written primarily for execs who lead mid-managers.