Ken Follett is one of my favorite authors. I was really mesmerized by the Kingsbridge saga and the Century trilogy that he has authored, not to mention his iconic debut novel The Eye of the Needle. So, I did have a lot of expectations about this work. On Wings of Eagles is a fictionalized account of real-life events that occurred in Teheran at the height of the Islamic revolution that unfolded in that country in 1979. It is not very easy to pull off a full-length novel on real life events. Follett, rather wryly admits in the foreword to this work that he did face a problem as to how to make the narrative as fast paced as he would have liked, because, in real life things do not move that fast. But he does make a concerted effort all the same and is fairly successful at that.
Electronic Data Systems (EDS) is a company that was founded by Ross Perot, who later was a US Presidential hopeful as an independent candidate in 1992 and a Reform Party candidate in 1996. He had a strong showing in both the elections as a third-party candidate, other than Republican/ Democrat, but was unsuccessful at the hustings.
In late 70s EDS started operations in Iran, where they were involved in the establishment of a Social Security system for the country. The company had moved into Iran when the country was under the control of the Shah, who was running an autocratic and brutal regime. However, things began to go bad for the company, when there was an uprising against the Shah, which was spearheaded by the cleric, Ayatollah Khomeini. Shah, in a bid to show his credentials as a paragon of virtue, and to negate his losing grip on his country, tried to go after the foreign companies in a bid to crack down on alleged corruption that they were indulging in. There is controversy as to whether EDS was involved in corrupt practices or not in Iran. Ken Follet, in his work tries to portray, EDS and Perot as totally upright and above board in their dealings with the bureaucracy in Iran. However, there are conflicting reports on this aspect, and I happened to read an account suggesting the contrary in a web edition of The Chicago Tribune. However, that’s not the point of contention in this book. What Follett wants to portray is the kind of commitment that Perot as an employer had towards his employees when they were caught in a situation of grave danger in a foreign country that was fast spiraling out of control. Of course, there is a likelihood that the account could be highly exaggerated to show Perot in good light, but the basic fact remains that he was committed to taking care of his employees in their time of need.
In early 1979, two employees of EDS, stationed in Teheran, Paul Chiapparone and Bill Gaylord were arrested by the Iranian authorities. The claim is that there were no charges made against the US employees and that they were arbitrarily kept in prison. A steep bail of about 13 million US dollars was placed for their release, which according to some other accounts was the amount that Iran had paid to EDS for allegedly unsatisfactory services provided by the company. Again, Follett papers over that particular allegation. Perot tried to pull strings through the high and mighty in the US administration to get his employees released. All his efforts came to nought, probably because of the confusion and chaos that prevailed in the country with the Shah’s days on the throne being numbered. It was at this juncture that the Texan came up with a daring plan to rescue his employees from Iran.
Perot sought the help of a retired marine Colonel by the name of Arthur “Bull” Simons. He thereafter, under the leadership of Simons, created a team of volunteer EDS employees (all of them ex-soldiers) to go into troubled Iran and extract the two jailed employees. It was this act of daring and commitment of Perot that Follett has made the central theme of this book.
Under the leadership of Simons, the team had carried out lot of practice for the prison break while they were still in Dallas. All this was done based on the information regarding the layout of the prison and the situation in Iran that they had received from their contacts in Iran. But, once they landed in Teheran, they were confronted by the fact that the actual layout of the prison was totally different as compared to what they were made to believe while they were in the States. Moreover, within a few days of the team landing in Iran, Paul and Bill were transferred to the more secure Gasr prison, where close to 10,000 prisoners were incarcerated. Follett describes in detail the disappointments faced by the team on this account, as well as the lengthy deliberations that were happening on the sidelines with the Iranian judicial authorities, to possibly enable the release of the prisoners.
Finally, in February 1979, there was an uprising in the Gasr prison aided by the revolutionaries, which led to a prison break and both Bill and Paul getting out of the prison in the melee that followed. According to Follett’s account, an Iranian employee of EDS, Rashid, was actively involved in engineering the prison break, but this fact is strongly contested in certain other accounts of the event that I had gone through. Follett, thereafter describes in detail the harrowing overland escape of the rescue team and the freed prisoners from Iran into Turkey. The account of the overland escape predictably reads like the script of an escape movie, with thugs, unreasonable regional rebel leaders and hard physical conditions all thrown in for good measure. A statement attributed to Col Simons, as per another account, however, says that the escape was like a picnic down the road. Maybe that was the perception of a battle-hardened marine coming across!!!
Anyway, it is not for the reader to doubt the truth of the details in the narration. The fact that I appreciated was that Ross Perot, had the gumption to plan such an audacious escape in spite of all the odds faced by the company in a totally destabilized country that Iran was at that point in time. Various accounts state that the book was doctored by EDS and required the nod of Perot before publication. I wouldn’t grudge Perot for that, because I think he earned that right on account of the bold stand that he took in coming to the aid of his employees in their time of need. I gather that a shrewd businessman’s brain was at work here, because the book became a best seller. Moreover, the television rights of the book were also sold and a five-part series was made, which too became a much-watched series on TV.
However, even though the book is extremely enjoyable, I would say that Ken Follett is not at his best here. He does make a sincere effort to build up the narration, what with all the efforts to etch out each and every character with a soul of their own. I guess, being a real-life event, the author did have certain limitations on the degree of freedom that he could afford to take with the portrayal of the protagonists. It is however, a very well researched book, and will definitely be considered as one of the main sources of information about those tumultuous days in the history of Iran, when the country was in the throes of a violent revolution.