What do you think?
Rate this book
Gratisessen für Millionäre
Amerikanischer Kapitalismus trifft koreanische Tradition
Casey Han, Tochter koreanischer Einwanderer, hat sich den amerikanischen Traum zu eigen Sie will reich und erfolgreich sein. Doch nach dem Studium hat sie noch keinen Job und lebt über ihre Verhältnisse – zum Ärger der Eltern, die große Opfer gebracht haben, um ihren Kindern eine bessere Zukunft zu bieten. Während Casey vor der bunten Kulisse New Yorks einen Weg voller kleiner Triumphe und spektakulärer Misserfolge beschreitet, prallen Werte und Wünsche aufeinander.
Fesselnd und intelligent erzählt Min Jin Lee von einer orientierungslosen jungen Frau, ihrer Familie und ihren Freunden und enthüllt dabei Schicht für Schicht, wie eine Gemeinschaft sich an Traditionen klammert und Menschen zwischen zwei Welten gefangen sind.
849 pages, Kindle Edition
First published May 7, 2007
4361 people are currently reading
62188 people want to read
About the author
Min Jin Lee
18 books8,591 followersMin Jin Lee’s novel Pachinko (Feb 2017) is a national bestseller, a New York Times Editor’s Choice and an American Booksellers Association’s Indie Next Great Reads. Lee’s debut novel Free Food for Millionaires (May 2007) was a No. 1 Book Sense Pick, a New York Times Editor’s Choice, a Wall Street Journal Juggle Book Club selection, and a national bestseller; it was a Top 10 Novels of the Year for The Times of London, NPR’s Fresh Air and USA Today.
Min Jin went to Yale College where she was awarded both the Henry Wright Prize for Nonfiction and the James Ashmun Veech Prize for Fiction. She attended law school at Georgetown University and worked as a lawyer for several years in New York prior to writing full time.
She has received the NYFA Fellowship for Fiction, the Peden Prize from The Missouri Review for Best Story, and the Narrative Prize for New and Emerging Writer. Her fiction has been featured on NPR’s Selected Shorts and has appeared most recently in One Story. Her writings about books, travel and food have appeared in The New York Times Magazine, The New York Times Book Review, The Times Literary Supplement, Conde Nast Traveler, The Times of London, Vogue (US), Travel + Leisure (SEA), Wall Street Journal and Food & Wine. Her personal essays have been anthologized in To Be Real, Breeder, The Mark Twain Anthology: Great Writers on His Life and Work, One Big Happy Family, Sugar in My Bowl, and The Global and the Intimate: Feminism in Our Time. She served three consecutive seasons as a Morning Forum columnist of the Chosun Ilbo of South Korea.
Lee has spoken about writing, politics, film and literature at various institutions including Columbia University, French Institute Alliance Francaise, The Center for Fiction, Tufts, Loyola Marymount University, Stanford, Johns Hopkins (SAIS), University of Connecticut, Boston College, Hamilton College, Hunter College of New York, Harvard Law School, Yale University, Ewha University, Waseda University, the American School in Japan, World Women’s Forum, Korean Community Center (NJ), the Hay Literary Festival (UK), the Tokyo American Center of the U.S. Embassy, the Asia House (UK), and the Asia Society in New York, San Francisco and Hong Kong. In 2017, she won the Literary Death Match (Brooklyn/Episode 8), and she is a proud alumna of Women of Letters (Public Theater).
From 2007 to 2011, Min Jin lived in Tokyo where she researched and wrote Pachinko. She lives in New York with her family.
Min Jin went to Yale College where she was awarded both the Henry Wright Prize for Nonfiction and the James Ashmun Veech Prize for Fiction. She attended law school at Georgetown University and worked as a lawyer for several years in New York prior to writing full time.
She has received the NYFA Fellowship for Fiction, the Peden Prize from The Missouri Review for Best Story, and the Narrative Prize for New and Emerging Writer. Her fiction has been featured on NPR’s Selected Shorts and has appeared most recently in One Story. Her writings about books, travel and food have appeared in The New York Times Magazine, The New York Times Book Review, The Times Literary Supplement, Conde Nast Traveler, The Times of London, Vogue (US), Travel + Leisure (SEA), Wall Street Journal and Food & Wine. Her personal essays have been anthologized in To Be Real, Breeder, The Mark Twain Anthology: Great Writers on His Life and Work, One Big Happy Family, Sugar in My Bowl, and The Global and the Intimate: Feminism in Our Time. She served three consecutive seasons as a Morning Forum columnist of the Chosun Ilbo of South Korea.
Lee has spoken about writing, politics, film and literature at various institutions including Columbia University, French Institute Alliance Francaise, The Center for Fiction, Tufts, Loyola Marymount University, Stanford, Johns Hopkins (SAIS), University of Connecticut, Boston College, Hamilton College, Hunter College of New York, Harvard Law School, Yale University, Ewha University, Waseda University, the American School in Japan, World Women’s Forum, Korean Community Center (NJ), the Hay Literary Festival (UK), the Tokyo American Center of the U.S. Embassy, the Asia House (UK), and the Asia Society in New York, San Francisco and Hong Kong. In 2017, she won the Literary Death Match (Brooklyn/Episode 8), and she is a proud alumna of Women of Letters (Public Theater).
From 2007 to 2011, Min Jin lived in Tokyo where she researched and wrote Pachinko. She lives in New York with her family.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 4,431 reviews
August 11, 2025
at the end of the year when i've finished my reading challenge...that's long book season.
and after pachinko, an extremely long family drama is now my idea of a good time.
i love the core theme of this book so much: the idea that those who are poor or suffering value their pride, while the wealthy expect the world to give them favors they accept without qualm. in other words, at a free lunch, the well-off rush to pile their plates while those in need take what's left.
i've also really been loving long books lately. i'm a short book stan at heart, but spending 600-800 pages in the company of great characters is far superior.
that doesn't mean this book wasn't too long.
it's omniscient, it follows about 900 characters, it's extremely repetitive. at more than one moment i thought i'd lost my place in my book and was reading the same chapter over again. it ends abruptly, and i feel a bit cheated out of knowing where this cast is after caring about them for so long (and doing a lot to keep the thousands of names straight).
but none of that overpowers my enjoyment of it.
bottom line: not perfect but very good.
and after pachinko, an extremely long family drama is now my idea of a good time.
i love the core theme of this book so much: the idea that those who are poor or suffering value their pride, while the wealthy expect the world to give them favors they accept without qualm. in other words, at a free lunch, the well-off rush to pile their plates while those in need take what's left.
i've also really been loving long books lately. i'm a short book stan at heart, but spending 600-800 pages in the company of great characters is far superior.
that doesn't mean this book wasn't too long.
it's omniscient, it follows about 900 characters, it's extremely repetitive. at more than one moment i thought i'd lost my place in my book and was reading the same chapter over again. it ends abruptly, and i feel a bit cheated out of knowing where this cast is after caring about them for so long (and doing a lot to keep the thousands of names straight).
but none of that overpowers my enjoyment of it.
bottom line: not perfect but very good.
March 4, 2018
3.5 stars
While not as iconic as her sophomore novel Pachinko , Min Jin Lee's literary debut Free Food for Millionaires still stands as an important and entertaining read with a wide cast of characters. As a couple other reviews on Goodreads noted, you might have to be Asian - and more specifically, a child of immigrants - to fully appreciate the themes and events Lee portrays in this novel. Through her characters, she portrays complex Asian American family dynamics as well as the fight for upward mobility imposed on and embarked upon by so many immigrants in the United States. Indeed, one of the most admirable themes in Free Food for Millionaires was money, capitalism, and the extent to which characters cut down others and/or parts of themselves for monetary wealth.
Similar to her work Pachinko, Lee also provides insightful commentary on issues of gender, showing the suffering and resilience of Asian American women in particular. She does not hesitate to highlight the racism of white men and the misogyny of men in general, which I appreciate. I leaned toward giving this book three stars because its middle dragged with some narratives I found unnecessary or too long, but a couple of brilliant scenes related to gender and fighting sexism toward the end of the novel pulled it up to four. And while the characters in Free Food for Millionaires did not blow me away, I found Casey's characterization consistent, nuanced, and well-written, so fitting for such a protagonist who is so distinctly her own.
Overall, recommended if the blurb intrigues you and you do not mind a long book. We need more Asian American writers like Min Jin Lee so I am very excited for what she will release next.
While not as iconic as her sophomore novel Pachinko , Min Jin Lee's literary debut Free Food for Millionaires still stands as an important and entertaining read with a wide cast of characters. As a couple other reviews on Goodreads noted, you might have to be Asian - and more specifically, a child of immigrants - to fully appreciate the themes and events Lee portrays in this novel. Through her characters, she portrays complex Asian American family dynamics as well as the fight for upward mobility imposed on and embarked upon by so many immigrants in the United States. Indeed, one of the most admirable themes in Free Food for Millionaires was money, capitalism, and the extent to which characters cut down others and/or parts of themselves for monetary wealth.
Similar to her work Pachinko, Lee also provides insightful commentary on issues of gender, showing the suffering and resilience of Asian American women in particular. She does not hesitate to highlight the racism of white men and the misogyny of men in general, which I appreciate. I leaned toward giving this book three stars because its middle dragged with some narratives I found unnecessary or too long, but a couple of brilliant scenes related to gender and fighting sexism toward the end of the novel pulled it up to four. And while the characters in Free Food for Millionaires did not blow me away, I found Casey's characterization consistent, nuanced, and well-written, so fitting for such a protagonist who is so distinctly her own.
Overall, recommended if the blurb intrigues you and you do not mind a long book. We need more Asian American writers like Min Jin Lee so I am very excited for what she will release next.
July 21, 2007
I thoroughly enjoyed this book.
Unlike the majority of the reviewers, I liked Casey Han. I found her pursuit of higher education, materialism, desire for religion, lust, need for independence, mass credit card debt, love of fashion, and the way she constantly seemed to disappoint her family quite realistic. Despite the fact that Casey is willing to walk away from her family, her cheating American boyfriend, her Korean boyfriend, and refuses help offered by her long-time family friend all in the name of independence, she never quite manages to make it on her own. She falls back on her new best friend, men, and Sabine all throughout the story. In the end, despite $23,000 in credit card debt and an even larger student loan, she ends up with literally nothing thanks to her gambling, evicted ex-boyfriend. This book also gives an outsider a glimpse inside homes and relationships of Korean-Americans. This is the first Korean-American book I have read and now I would like to read more. I also hope to have the chance to read more from Ms. Lee in the future.
Unlike the majority of the reviewers, I liked Casey Han. I found her pursuit of higher education, materialism, desire for religion, lust, need for independence, mass credit card debt, love of fashion, and the way she constantly seemed to disappoint her family quite realistic. Despite the fact that Casey is willing to walk away from her family, her cheating American boyfriend, her Korean boyfriend, and refuses help offered by her long-time family friend all in the name of independence, she never quite manages to make it on her own. She falls back on her new best friend, men, and Sabine all throughout the story. In the end, despite $23,000 in credit card debt and an even larger student loan, she ends up with literally nothing thanks to her gambling, evicted ex-boyfriend. This book also gives an outsider a glimpse inside homes and relationships of Korean-Americans. This is the first Korean-American book I have read and now I would like to read more. I also hope to have the chance to read more from Ms. Lee in the future.
August 13, 2025
A 1990’s retelling of Middlemarch
Yes, if you are expecting a Pachinko-light, you might be disappointed. Because this is not Pachinko.
This book centers on a young college graduate named Casey, an American of Korean descent. She has just graduated from Princeton, returns home to her New York parents for the summer, and is looking for a job.
Isn't it wild that the 90’s is now considered historical fiction?
As someone who survived the 90’s, this novel is spot on.
Casey is put into several impossible situations, and she is forced to make difficult decisions. Although some of the more mature adults in her life do little to help her, she is condemned for her decisions. Many of the characters press social norms onto Casey without truly questioning if that would be in Casey’s best interest.
“So when are you going to get married?” This question was frequently asked of 18-year-olds in the 1990’s and 2000’s. Really? Should any 18-year old be getting married? And should anyone be forcing this agenda?
Free Food for Millionaires also has some beautifully flawed and complex characters, creating an authentic feel.
The Green Light at the End of the Dock (How much I spent):
Hardcover Text – $10.99 as an add-on for Book of the Month
Audiobook – Free through Libby
Connect With Me!
Blog Threads BookTube Facebook Insta My Bookstore at Pango
Yes, if you are expecting a Pachinko-light, you might be disappointed. Because this is not Pachinko.
This book centers on a young college graduate named Casey, an American of Korean descent. She has just graduated from Princeton, returns home to her New York parents for the summer, and is looking for a job.
Isn't it wild that the 90’s is now considered historical fiction?
As someone who survived the 90’s, this novel is spot on.
Casey is put into several impossible situations, and she is forced to make difficult decisions. Although some of the more mature adults in her life do little to help her, she is condemned for her decisions. Many of the characters press social norms onto Casey without truly questioning if that would be in Casey’s best interest.
“So when are you going to get married?” This question was frequently asked of 18-year-olds in the 1990’s and 2000’s. Really? Should any 18-year old be getting married? And should anyone be forcing this agenda?
Free Food for Millionaires also has some beautifully flawed and complex characters, creating an authentic feel.
The Green Light at the End of the Dock (How much I spent):
Hardcover Text – $10.99 as an add-on for Book of the Month
Audiobook – Free through Libby
Connect With Me!
Blog Threads BookTube Facebook Insta My Bookstore at Pango
February 29, 2008
I had been waiting for a long time to read the book. It was a page turner, peopled by overachieving kalbi eaters (my kind of people), full of sex, and ultimately... not all that. Actually it was kind of weak. Maybe it's me, but major plotlines involving getting internships while in business school (oh, sorry, B school) are not the stuff of dreams. And how many love triangles/illicit love affairs/star-crossed romances can a 550+ page book support? Apparently less than seven? The characters were introduced so clumsily that you knew from the first moment that they'd end up as somebody's paramour, or that they'd have an affair, or that they'd end up happy and in love, true love!
That being said, I did stay up late on more than one occasion reading this reverse-engineered telenovela.
That being said, I did stay up late on more than one occasion reading this reverse-engineered telenovela.
May 16, 2010
Most of my reading is contemporary lit fiction. Keeping that in mind, I disagree with allegations that this is chicklit or poorly written (which wasn't the view of the NYT Book Review either, btw). For me, this novel was thoroughly engaging--hard to put down, full of charm and wit, and rich with interesting interludes into characters' backgrounds. Yes, the way that it goes into those characters' backgrounds is modeled on 19th century novels, but I didn't find that dull -- for me, the book has enough contemporary flow and style that I continued to be interested (which is good, considering that I hardly ever read 19th century novels these days).
True, the first time I realized that we were going to hear the thoughts of each character, I was a little taken aback--but I got used to this.
In general, I loved the book, as I said. My only criticism would be that sometimes the pronoun usage was confusing -- occasionally when two characters were being mentioned in the same sentence, the pronoun usage was unclear.
To refer to this as chick-lit is not to get it, I think. I look forward to Lee's next book. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/01/boo...
True, the first time I realized that we were going to hear the thoughts of each character, I was a little taken aback--but I got used to this.
In general, I loved the book, as I said. My only criticism would be that sometimes the pronoun usage was confusing -- occasionally when two characters were being mentioned in the same sentence, the pronoun usage was unclear.
To refer to this as chick-lit is not to get it, I think. I look forward to Lee's next book. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/01/boo...
July 15, 2007
Update 7/15: I'm not reading any further. I just can't stand the way Lee writes. It's like Edith Wharton's clumsy cousin wrote a book, and then piped it through a Babelfish translator into chicklit cliches circa 2001. With a small dash of Korean culture for seasoning. An unsympathetic protagonist is a challenge for any novelist, but especially for one who writes so horribly. Sure, Lee has won a number of prizes and the book's been well reviewed in a number of places, but I just couldn't read it.
7/7/07 Only about 10 pages into a largeish novel. The topic -- Korean-American inter-generational conflicts-- seems promising but the main character is kind of annoying -- and her traits (like always dressing according to fashion magazine advice) seem a bit too much in shorthand. But I'll give it another couple of evenings.
7/7/07 Only about 10 pages into a largeish novel. The topic -- Korean-American inter-generational conflicts-- seems promising but the main character is kind of annoying -- and her traits (like always dressing according to fashion magazine advice) seem a bit too much in shorthand. But I'll give it another couple of evenings.
February 28, 2018
I LOVED this book! After reading and loving PACHINKO last spring, I knew I would need to come back to read this one and I am so so so happy that I did. Casey is such a flawed character, but she's flawed in so many of the same ways that I am.....and this made me love her so so so much. She may just be my new favorite book character, with her stubbornness and unwillingness to do what is expected of her. I love the way this book addresses immigration and class and wealth, too. The gambling addiction of a secondary character also really hit home for me, as people near to me have suffered greatly from this.
Highly highly recommended. Also, VERY different from Pachinko!
Highly highly recommended. Also, VERY different from Pachinko!
March 29, 2021
i absolutely devoured this. no easy feat, considering this is the longest audiobook i have ever listened to (25 hours!!!!!).
so i totally did not realize that, 10 years prior to publishing pachinko—which i have yet to read and very much want to—min jin lee had written this behemoth of a novel. of course, as soon as i did discover the existence of this sprawling korean-american nyc saga, i immediately went and borrowed the audiobook.
◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️
free food for millionaires is lit fic with a soapy edge (much illicit sex, yes) that i found wholly compelling for the cast of korean women at its core. these are characters who are messy, infuriating, generous, docile, hedonistic—all these qualities and more.
the book opens with casey han, newly minted princeton econ graduate, being kicked out of her parents’ home. her parents, leah and joseph han, are working-class korean immigrants who manage a dry cleaner in queens. as the novel progresses, we follow casey as she throws herself into the glitz and glamour of new york city in the 1990s, striving for heights that are not always in her means.
it starts slowly. as in, it took me several chapters to really acclimate to the prose (choppier than i was anticipating, and favouring short, unadorned sentences) and fall into the story.
but fall i did!
◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️
this novel explores the complex love that bonds immigrant families, for better or worse. it delves into the lives of korean people, korean communities, in new york city. it shows the ways in which cultural dissonance manifests as shame for yourself and people who look like you, but also the ways in which culture and community enmesh themselves irrevocably with joy and resilience.
there were certain moments when i felt so seen—no, flayed—that it was as though my most secret insecurities and biggest shames were laid bare by the characters. in the opening scene, as casey argues with her father, both of them refusing to stand down, pride rending them apart, i saw all too clearly myself with my dad (i am thankful to say that we are not nearly as bad as casey and joseph, but the emotion still rang painfully, viscerally true). casey's hedonism also resonated with me, her unwavering thirst for life even in the face of paralyzing uncertainty: where will i work? who will i be? how will i be?
not to mention: the interracial relationships between east asian & white characters touched on some dynamics that were all. too. real. let's just say the shift from VCR porn to online streaming sites has in no way diminished the fetishization of asian women in north america! nor have the years dulled our internalization of eurocentric beauty norms and the culturally ingrained urge to idolize white men.
but for all of the hurts and slights and cruelties done by and to the characters in this book, it never felt overwhelmingly grim or dismal. i wasn’t given the sense of bleak dejection that i often experience with lit fic, particularly when asian immigrants are involved. for that, i commend min jin lee. her characters have plenty of reason to be cynical—and some are, at times—but they haven’t calcified into the sort of jaded folks who would make the story difficult for me to read.
in fact, there are always, underscored, moments of benevolence and connection and generosity and warmth between the myriad characters in this sprawling story.
above all, this book is characterized by such profound yearning. each character longs for something, someone, some outcome, that feels just out of grasp—that is tangled with the lives of others, bearing consequences that hurt as much as enrich. there is longing for sex, for love beyond one's marriage, for immense material wealth, for wall street connections and six-figure bonuses.
free food for millionaires is propelled by this powerhouse of characters' desire.
bottom line? i'm coming to realize that the only literary fiction i enjoy is by & about people of colour.
so i totally did not realize that, 10 years prior to publishing pachinko—which i have yet to read and very much want to—min jin lee had written this behemoth of a novel. of course, as soon as i did discover the existence of this sprawling korean-american nyc saga, i immediately went and borrowed the audiobook.
◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️
free food for millionaires is lit fic with a soapy edge (much illicit sex, yes) that i found wholly compelling for the cast of korean women at its core. these are characters who are messy, infuriating, generous, docile, hedonistic—all these qualities and more.
the book opens with casey han, newly minted princeton econ graduate, being kicked out of her parents’ home. her parents, leah and joseph han, are working-class korean immigrants who manage a dry cleaner in queens. as the novel progresses, we follow casey as she throws herself into the glitz and glamour of new york city in the 1990s, striving for heights that are not always in her means.
it starts slowly. as in, it took me several chapters to really acclimate to the prose (choppier than i was anticipating, and favouring short, unadorned sentences) and fall into the story.
but fall i did!
◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️
this novel explores the complex love that bonds immigrant families, for better or worse. it delves into the lives of korean people, korean communities, in new york city. it shows the ways in which cultural dissonance manifests as shame for yourself and people who look like you, but also the ways in which culture and community enmesh themselves irrevocably with joy and resilience.
there were certain moments when i felt so seen—no, flayed—that it was as though my most secret insecurities and biggest shames were laid bare by the characters. in the opening scene, as casey argues with her father, both of them refusing to stand down, pride rending them apart, i saw all too clearly myself with my dad (i am thankful to say that we are not nearly as bad as casey and joseph, but the emotion still rang painfully, viscerally true). casey's hedonism also resonated with me, her unwavering thirst for life even in the face of paralyzing uncertainty: where will i work? who will i be? how will i be?
not to mention: the interracial relationships between east asian & white characters touched on some dynamics that were all. too. real. let's just say the shift from VCR porn to online streaming sites has in no way diminished the fetishization of asian women in north america! nor have the years dulled our internalization of eurocentric beauty norms and the culturally ingrained urge to idolize white men.
but for all of the hurts and slights and cruelties done by and to the characters in this book, it never felt overwhelmingly grim or dismal. i wasn’t given the sense of bleak dejection that i often experience with lit fic, particularly when asian immigrants are involved. for that, i commend min jin lee. her characters have plenty of reason to be cynical—and some are, at times—but they haven’t calcified into the sort of jaded folks who would make the story difficult for me to read.
in fact, there are always, underscored, moments of benevolence and connection and generosity and warmth between the myriad characters in this sprawling story.
above all, this book is characterized by such profound yearning. each character longs for something, someone, some outcome, that feels just out of grasp—that is tangled with the lives of others, bearing consequences that hurt as much as enrich. there is longing for sex, for love beyond one's marriage, for immense material wealth, for wall street connections and six-figure bonuses.
free food for millionaires is propelled by this powerhouse of characters' desire.
bottom line? i'm coming to realize that the only literary fiction i enjoy is by & about people of colour.
September 10, 2007
if i'd actually paid attention when i was applying to college, this might be an accurate reflection of my life. and if i was korean. and if i was religious. and if i liked making hats.
"free food" follows the post-college years of casey han, a queens-born ivy league grad who's undergoing one of those infamous "quarter-life" crises. the author, lee, keeps you interested by letting you peek into the minds of her employers, boyfriends, family, and friends.
she also gets the "1st generation asian" story spot on and i felt she was reading my mind with a lot of her character insights. i thoroughly enjoyed this book and will be rereading it. you may need to be asian to fully appreciate how carefully and accurately she depicts the class/culture clashes, but her male/female relationships are relevant to anyone who's ever been in love/lust.
"free food" follows the post-college years of casey han, a queens-born ivy league grad who's undergoing one of those infamous "quarter-life" crises. the author, lee, keeps you interested by letting you peek into the minds of her employers, boyfriends, family, and friends.
she also gets the "1st generation asian" story spot on and i felt she was reading my mind with a lot of her character insights. i thoroughly enjoyed this book and will be rereading it. you may need to be asian to fully appreciate how carefully and accurately she depicts the class/culture clashes, but her male/female relationships are relevant to anyone who's ever been in love/lust.
July 23, 2016
This is an epic length novel that's not an epic. It's a portrayal of life within the ambitious and high achieving Korean-American community in New York City during the 1990s. The book also aspires to be a romance novel of the 19th century style but with modern mores (i.e. lots of sex and not so much marriage).
As one would expect the conflict between traditional Korean and urban American culture is examined. Another theme are differences between those who are wealthy and those who wish they were wealthy. We soon learn that these same differences between rich and poor are also very real within the Korean-American community. And in the traditional Korean culture we also learn that being from the wrong place in Korea can make a difference.
However, the most visible theme of the book is the variety of male-female relationships with the book providing examples of just about every possible variation between good/happy to bad/sad. The book makes an obvious hint to be compared with the plot of Middlemarch. The story notes that our protagonist has read it multiple times. For readers who found that the 19th century Middlemarch didn't include sufficient explicit sex will find that this book makes up for it with a double dose.
There is also a reference to Jane Eyre but the parallel to that novel's plot is less obvious. I think the author was trying to say that this book is being written in the tradition of famous 19th century romance novels which probably explains its length.
The title of the book comes from an observation about ambitious investment bank brokers. The wealthiest were the ones most likely to elbow their way to the front of the line when the doors were opened to a free food smorgasbord. In other words, they had no qualms about accepting free gifts. Meanwhile, those of limited means were reluctant—or too proud—to accept the smallest gift because it might indicate an obligation or dependence on others.
The author's writing certainly shows an understanding of what it is like to be a member of a supportive faith community. In this case it is a Korean-American Presbyterian Church that at an official level are united by a common faith. But at a more practical level they are united by a common ethnic culture and real human friendships. This is a community that will come and visit when a member is sick. If the member is in the hospital they will visit their room and sing some hymns, causing people down the hall to turn and take notice.
It seems that every character in this novel manifested behavior at some point that I found either unwise or unacceptable. But the story made them real and very human. The skilled writing of the narrative kept me interested even though I couldn't identify closely with the characters.
The following is from the PageADay Booklover's Calendar, July 2012:
WORD-OF-MOUTH HIT
Casey Han is a Korean American ivy league graduate torn between the worlds of her immigrant upbringing and her spoiled college friends—the latter a swirl of expensive clothes, adulterous affairs, a sharp divide between rich and poor, and in the investment firm where she works, the free food of the book’s title. Casey’s struggle to find her place in the world goes a long way to explaining why she travels everywhere with Middlemarch. Lots to talk about here. No wonder Free Food for Millionaires is a book-club darling.
FREE FOOD FOR MILLIONAIRES, by Min Jin Lee (Grand Central, 2008)
As one would expect the conflict between traditional Korean and urban American culture is examined. Another theme are differences between those who are wealthy and those who wish they were wealthy. We soon learn that these same differences between rich and poor are also very real within the Korean-American community. And in the traditional Korean culture we also learn that being from the wrong place in Korea can make a difference.
However, the most visible theme of the book is the variety of male-female relationships with the book providing examples of just about every possible variation between good/happy to bad/sad. The book makes an obvious hint to be compared with the plot of Middlemarch. The story notes that our protagonist has read it multiple times. For readers who found that the 19th century Middlemarch didn't include sufficient explicit sex will find that this book makes up for it with a double dose.
There is also a reference to Jane Eyre but the parallel to that novel's plot is less obvious. I think the author was trying to say that this book is being written in the tradition of famous 19th century romance novels which probably explains its length.
The title of the book comes from an observation about ambitious investment bank brokers. The wealthiest were the ones most likely to elbow their way to the front of the line when the doors were opened to a free food smorgasbord. In other words, they had no qualms about accepting free gifts. Meanwhile, those of limited means were reluctant—or too proud—to accept the smallest gift because it might indicate an obligation or dependence on others.
The author's writing certainly shows an understanding of what it is like to be a member of a supportive faith community. In this case it is a Korean-American Presbyterian Church that at an official level are united by a common faith. But at a more practical level they are united by a common ethnic culture and real human friendships. This is a community that will come and visit when a member is sick. If the member is in the hospital they will visit their room and sing some hymns, causing people down the hall to turn and take notice.
It seems that every character in this novel manifested behavior at some point that I found either unwise or unacceptable. But the story made them real and very human. The skilled writing of the narrative kept me interested even though I couldn't identify closely with the characters.
The following is from the PageADay Booklover's Calendar, July 2012:
WORD-OF-MOUTH HIT
Casey Han is a Korean American ivy league graduate torn between the worlds of her immigrant upbringing and her spoiled college friends—the latter a swirl of expensive clothes, adulterous affairs, a sharp divide between rich and poor, and in the investment firm where she works, the free food of the book’s title. Casey’s struggle to find her place in the world goes a long way to explaining why she travels everywhere with Middlemarch. Lots to talk about here. No wonder Free Food for Millionaires is a book-club darling.
FREE FOOD FOR MILLIONAIRES, by Min Jin Lee (Grand Central, 2008)
September 10, 2008
At a whopping 600-plus pages, the "poverty" theme felt like constant hammerblows, which was just tiresome (for a contrast as to how "poverty" can be rendered thematically in narrative that will touch you to the bone, check out Dorothy Allison's Bastard Out of Carolina).
Casey the protagonist, as complex as she is, seems to veer between two extremes: being unhappy and whiny about not having any money and being unhappy and whiny when she's being offered help with money. She's unhappy and whiny even when she's enjoying the finer things in life (e.g. at her last farewell dinner with her colleagues from the i-bank, she's presented with a set of fabulous golf clubs, and she complains and bitches about that). At times, one felt like giving her a good hard shake: you have a Princeton degree, a law school offer to Columbia, a job at one of the most prestigious bulge-bracket investment bank, and if she had been able to keep at it, an NYU Stern business school degree. It's more than what 95% of "poor people" in America have. Add to that a wardrobe full of designer clothes, hats galore, and poor as she is, she's given presents like Rolex watches and Hermes scarves. Really, why is she bitching all the time?
That's not the only annoying thing. The mother feels like a stereotypical, cartoonish Korean submissive-demure first generation Asian -- to the point that although she'd lived in America for the better part of her adult years, she was unable to fight off her choir director's sexual assault, and later, unable to recognize it as "date-rape" and even worse, did not realize she was pregnant. Is this woman for real? On which cloud-lala does she live? There's a limit to which the non-awakened "Asian submissiveness" can be pushed to.
The other characters in this book are no less stereotypical: cookie cutter types that fail to break through their molds and worse, they fail to enliven the set pieces and situations into which the writer has thrown them. Ted, for example, is your stereotypical asshole Korean machismo -- a lying, traitorous investment banker, ambitious and voracious and crass. Ella, his wife, again the demure, submissive type, religious to a fault, the perfect angel through to the end.
In Casey's love-interest -- Unu -- lies the sole glimmer of redemption for this story and yet, although a dark horse with his gambling obsession, he comes across as bland and uninteresting, ultimately. He is an anti-hero, he rescues Casey from her poverty, but fails to rescue himself.
The plot also skips choice-scenes that might have hurtled this story over and above the cross-cultural confrontations that cloud its pages: e.g. the reconciliation scene with the father at the hospital could have been more drawn out; the choice of "no" dialogue" seems strange for the mouthy Casey while too much space in that same sequence was devoted towards a bland, uninformative conversation between Tina (Casey's sister) and the father. Again, the scene when Casey goes on her first date with Unu could have been developed and shown -- it might have given us a clue as to the future dynamic of this couple. I'd have liked that intervening scene when Casey takes back her cheating boyfriend. She leaves him with her stuff in garbage bags and next thing we know, they're living together and engaged to be married. This story is rife with ripe plotpoint potentials like these that remain unexplored and unmined.
It's de rigeur nowadays in "high-brow" literature to end with the door closed-window open effect, and here, the door-closing, I suppose, is Casey's decision to drop B-school, turn down the Kearn Davis investment banker offer, and make hats for a living. The unresolved "window-open" effect is whether she and Unu will get back together. And yet, I find myself completely unsatisfied at the end of this labor of narrative -- forcing myself to finish by sheer will and time-investment. What about the father-daughter relationship? What about the mother? How will she face the rest of her life?
Lastly, the prose is flat and monotonous to the point of driving me stir-crazy. Every sentence in a progression of paragraphs would begin "Sabine did this", "Casey did this,""Unu did this", "Tina did this".
After reading two pages of praise for this book from America's finest reviewers, I'm left wondering: are the standards for writing good literature different for minorities? Am I supposed to laud the writer's effort here because she's a "sister"? By selling a minority writer short, are we not ultimately selling ourselves short?
Casey the protagonist, as complex as she is, seems to veer between two extremes: being unhappy and whiny about not having any money and being unhappy and whiny when she's being offered help with money. She's unhappy and whiny even when she's enjoying the finer things in life (e.g. at her last farewell dinner with her colleagues from the i-bank, she's presented with a set of fabulous golf clubs, and she complains and bitches about that). At times, one felt like giving her a good hard shake: you have a Princeton degree, a law school offer to Columbia, a job at one of the most prestigious bulge-bracket investment bank, and if she had been able to keep at it, an NYU Stern business school degree. It's more than what 95% of "poor people" in America have. Add to that a wardrobe full of designer clothes, hats galore, and poor as she is, she's given presents like Rolex watches and Hermes scarves. Really, why is she bitching all the time?
That's not the only annoying thing. The mother feels like a stereotypical, cartoonish Korean submissive-demure first generation Asian -- to the point that although she'd lived in America for the better part of her adult years, she was unable to fight off her choir director's sexual assault, and later, unable to recognize it as "date-rape" and even worse, did not realize she was pregnant. Is this woman for real? On which cloud-lala does she live? There's a limit to which the non-awakened "Asian submissiveness" can be pushed to.
The other characters in this book are no less stereotypical: cookie cutter types that fail to break through their molds and worse, they fail to enliven the set pieces and situations into which the writer has thrown them. Ted, for example, is your stereotypical asshole Korean machismo -- a lying, traitorous investment banker, ambitious and voracious and crass. Ella, his wife, again the demure, submissive type, religious to a fault, the perfect angel through to the end.
In Casey's love-interest -- Unu -- lies the sole glimmer of redemption for this story and yet, although a dark horse with his gambling obsession, he comes across as bland and uninteresting, ultimately. He is an anti-hero, he rescues Casey from her poverty, but fails to rescue himself.
The plot also skips choice-scenes that might have hurtled this story over and above the cross-cultural confrontations that cloud its pages: e.g. the reconciliation scene with the father at the hospital could have been more drawn out; the choice of "no" dialogue" seems strange for the mouthy Casey while too much space in that same sequence was devoted towards a bland, uninformative conversation between Tina (Casey's sister) and the father. Again, the scene when Casey goes on her first date with Unu could have been developed and shown -- it might have given us a clue as to the future dynamic of this couple. I'd have liked that intervening scene when Casey takes back her cheating boyfriend. She leaves him with her stuff in garbage bags and next thing we know, they're living together and engaged to be married. This story is rife with ripe plotpoint potentials like these that remain unexplored and unmined.
It's de rigeur nowadays in "high-brow" literature to end with the door closed-window open effect, and here, the door-closing, I suppose, is Casey's decision to drop B-school, turn down the Kearn Davis investment banker offer, and make hats for a living. The unresolved "window-open" effect is whether she and Unu will get back together. And yet, I find myself completely unsatisfied at the end of this labor of narrative -- forcing myself to finish by sheer will and time-investment. What about the father-daughter relationship? What about the mother? How will she face the rest of her life?
Lastly, the prose is flat and monotonous to the point of driving me stir-crazy. Every sentence in a progression of paragraphs would begin "Sabine did this", "Casey did this,""Unu did this", "Tina did this".
After reading two pages of praise for this book from America's finest reviewers, I'm left wondering: are the standards for writing good literature different for minorities? Am I supposed to laud the writer's effort here because she's a "sister"? By selling a minority writer short, are we not ultimately selling ourselves short?
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
February 7, 2021
Library- overdrive Audiobook
Review soon... in a day or two. I enjoyed the Audiobook VERY MUCH!!
I have no idea why I had low expectations- ( saw low reviews- perhaps after I downloaded the library audio?)...
Few complaints from me—
It was a terrific engaging thought provoking surprise!
I’m happy to read ‘anything’ by Min Jin Lee.
Review soon... in a day or two. I enjoyed the Audiobook VERY MUCH!!
I have no idea why I had low expectations- ( saw low reviews- perhaps after I downloaded the library audio?)...
Few complaints from me—
It was a terrific engaging thought provoking surprise!
I’m happy to read ‘anything’ by Min Jin Lee.
November 26, 2012
*2012..the year I gave out so many five star ratings, I'm shocking even myself.*
This book has been called by one reviewer the 'post-feminist' version of 'Bonfire of the Vanities'. Others have panned it because the characters are unlikeable to them. My own experience is I didn't want the book to end. I'm still thinking about Casey, Leah, Unu, Ella and the other fully formed characters--even minor ones-- that seemed to step off the page. Not only is this a novel of the Korean-American experience and Wall Street culture (both of which I was completely unfamiliar with), it's also an incredibly articulate and meticulous character study of the basic human themes of love, betrayal, integrity, failure, success and the quest for happiness. The characters are imperfect which makes them life-like and sometimes truly are unlikeable, yet the author, Min Jin Lee, has the gift of helping us understand the reasons they take the wrong path or hurt someone or hell, even wrack up credit cards as they struggle to find their identity.
I love character study based novels, the kind that seem to do an autopsy on the human condition. This novel did just that and more. I feel like I had a relationship with the book. Sometimes it pissed me off and other times it had me nearly crying but it made me feel. And that's why I read. Intelligent, wise and beautifully written.
This book has been called by one reviewer the 'post-feminist' version of 'Bonfire of the Vanities'. Others have panned it because the characters are unlikeable to them. My own experience is I didn't want the book to end. I'm still thinking about Casey, Leah, Unu, Ella and the other fully formed characters--even minor ones-- that seemed to step off the page. Not only is this a novel of the Korean-American experience and Wall Street culture (both of which I was completely unfamiliar with), it's also an incredibly articulate and meticulous character study of the basic human themes of love, betrayal, integrity, failure, success and the quest for happiness. The characters are imperfect which makes them life-like and sometimes truly are unlikeable, yet the author, Min Jin Lee, has the gift of helping us understand the reasons they take the wrong path or hurt someone or hell, even wrack up credit cards as they struggle to find their identity.
I love character study based novels, the kind that seem to do an autopsy on the human condition. This novel did just that and more. I feel like I had a relationship with the book. Sometimes it pissed me off and other times it had me nearly crying but it made me feel. And that's why I read. Intelligent, wise and beautifully written.
August 2, 2010
Completely absorbing--I was eager to return to these characters each night as my treat after a long day. Loved the omniscient point of view; it's rare in the fiction I read that I can get inside the mind of each character, and so unlike my normal life where I only get to know what I'm thinking. The author moves so deftly between characters too, even within the same paragraph. I've read clunkier versions where each chapter heading is a new character and their voice alone, but Lee seamlessly shifts between one character's thoughts and another in the same scene. In one passage the main character, Casey, checks into a hotel. And for one brief moment you shift to what the desk clerk is thinking when he checks her in, and then back to Casey. It's a marvel when this is done well. And then the actual story is good too--a contemporary tale of a young Korean woman finding her way in Manhattan. Lots of good themes explored here--the immigrant experience in America, how class affects your choices, what you make of your talents in this life.
September 19, 2007
There are two good things about Free Food for Millionaires: the title (taken from the free lunches offered to investment bankers) and the cover art. That's about it.
The remaining 500 pages drag through endless chapters of Casey and her acquaintances trying to get on with their lives. Some of the characters grow and learn over time but the main character, Casey, doesn't do a damn thing in this book. She's apparently good at investment banking and good at millinery (free food for milliners?) but terrible at making decisions and even worse at running her own life. Although she has a number of people falling over themselves willing to mentor her, she never sticks with a plan long enough to see it to completion and to get some stability in place. Instead she just burns through her friends, mentors and potential employers like the numerous cigarettes she chain smokes throughout the book.
Without a likeable central character, there is very little motivation to suffer through endless pages of product name dropping, lengthy descriptions, and sex scenes that fail to titillate. When I finished the book (and still nothing had happened by the last page), all I could do was give a sigh of relief to move onto something more interesting.
The remaining 500 pages drag through endless chapters of Casey and her acquaintances trying to get on with their lives. Some of the characters grow and learn over time but the main character, Casey, doesn't do a damn thing in this book. She's apparently good at investment banking and good at millinery (free food for milliners?) but terrible at making decisions and even worse at running her own life. Although she has a number of people falling over themselves willing to mentor her, she never sticks with a plan long enough to see it to completion and to get some stability in place. Instead she just burns through her friends, mentors and potential employers like the numerous cigarettes she chain smokes throughout the book.
Without a likeable central character, there is very little motivation to suffer through endless pages of product name dropping, lengthy descriptions, and sex scenes that fail to titillate. When I finished the book (and still nothing had happened by the last page), all I could do was give a sigh of relief to move onto something more interesting.
May 18, 2008
***SPOILERS***SPOILERS***SPOILERS***
This book could have been trimmed by about 100 pages, but nonetheless I enjoyed it in the way I enjoy Guiding Light. Will they kiss? Oh my the unaccepted boyfriend is going to make a scene with her parents! Oh my! This soap opera of a novel takes us through the life of a young Korean-American Princeton graduate who's surrounded by other upwardly mobile Ivy graduates while she herself perpetually can't get out of debt on account of her shopping addiction.
The first chapter itself initializes with too much of a bang in my opinion, and peters out throughout with not enough 'bangs'. I think the best parts of the novel concern the older generation, the mother and father, their fellow church-goers, parents of their friends. Their episodes are written with a subtlety, delicacy, and poignancy that are lacking sometimes when she writes about the main character Casey or her business i-banking cohorts.
I am probably more tussled by the New York Times review of this book. The reviewer Schillinger notes that Lee's strength lies in her ability to garner the reader's "appreciation of the usual." That much I admit. But how is the "drama intensifi[ed]" by being set in an "unfamiliar backdrop" of the "tightly knit social world of Korean immigrants"? Logically that would mean that Korean-American New Yorkers would find the plot less dramatic? Odd.
Despite my misgivings I do recommend the book. The reading is fast, the characters portrayed sometimes in such caricature that I find myself chortling at them and their portrayal, and all in all somewhat fun and entertaining, and written well if somewhat wordy (carry a pencil with you and practice your copy editing skills).
And remember, with energy prices at record highs, it's cheaper than turning to ABC's Days of Our Lives.
This book could have been trimmed by about 100 pages, but nonetheless I enjoyed it in the way I enjoy Guiding Light. Will they kiss? Oh my the unaccepted boyfriend is going to make a scene with her parents! Oh my! This soap opera of a novel takes us through the life of a young Korean-American Princeton graduate who's surrounded by other upwardly mobile Ivy graduates while she herself perpetually can't get out of debt on account of her shopping addiction.
The first chapter itself initializes with too much of a bang in my opinion, and peters out throughout with not enough 'bangs'. I think the best parts of the novel concern the older generation, the mother and father, their fellow church-goers, parents of their friends. Their episodes are written with a subtlety, delicacy, and poignancy that are lacking sometimes when she writes about the main character Casey or her business i-banking cohorts.
I am probably more tussled by the New York Times review of this book. The reviewer Schillinger notes that Lee's strength lies in her ability to garner the reader's "appreciation of the usual." That much I admit. But how is the "drama intensifi[ed]" by being set in an "unfamiliar backdrop" of the "tightly knit social world of Korean immigrants"? Logically that would mean that Korean-American New Yorkers would find the plot less dramatic? Odd.
Despite my misgivings I do recommend the book. The reading is fast, the characters portrayed sometimes in such caricature that I find myself chortling at them and their portrayal, and all in all somewhat fun and entertaining, and written well if somewhat wordy (carry a pencil with you and practice your copy editing skills).
And remember, with energy prices at record highs, it's cheaper than turning to ABC's Days of Our Lives.
November 17, 2019
Love these characters, even the assholes. Did not want the story to end.
February 11, 2019
Free Food for Millionaires belongs to the genre I absolutely hate the most: chick lit masquerading as literary fiction. Supposedly the book is an homage to great Victorian novels such as Middlemarch, but really, no. Not even close.
The main character, Casey Han, is at the center of a parade of cliches: struggling immigrant parents who are emotionally distant (and even cruel), a desire to be socially mobile that takes her to Princeton, a bad relationship with an American boy that ends in tears, and lots of catty I-love-you-I-hate-you encounters with other women.
Basically, Free Food for Millionaires is chick-lit melodrama at its most indulgent. It is narcissistic, status-obsessed, and full of imaginary victimhood. Yes, life is unfair and capitalism sucks, but that is something you are not allowed to complain about if your superficial protagonist dresses according to the advice of fashion magazines and thinks that agnosticism is a philosophically edgy move.
The main character, Casey Han, is at the center of a parade of cliches: struggling immigrant parents who are emotionally distant (and even cruel), a desire to be socially mobile that takes her to Princeton, a bad relationship with an American boy that ends in tears, and lots of catty I-love-you-I-hate-you encounters with other women.
Basically, Free Food for Millionaires is chick-lit melodrama at its most indulgent. It is narcissistic, status-obsessed, and full of imaginary victimhood. Yes, life is unfair and capitalism sucks, but that is something you are not allowed to complain about if your superficial protagonist dresses according to the advice of fashion magazines and thinks that agnosticism is a philosophically edgy move.
January 28, 2022
Super long. Honestly had a hard time staying interested. Worth reading, but I think I had high expectations.
February 19, 2010
I found this far too long. It's quite a thick book, and I can't help thinking the story could have been edited down to become a more dynamic, involving plot.
The characters were also a bit stale. I coldn't relate to many of them. They were either too selfish, or far too giving. Lee's characters weren't very likable. Like the majority of people, I also didn't like Casey Han. I found her 'wonder woman cuffs' silly. Although there was nothing wrong with her towards the end of the book, the way she kept messing up her life and those around her made me mad.
I think overall, this story does have potential, it offers an insight into the Korean American way of life, the adversities they went through, and how they have shaped their identity in the US.
Having said that, the Korean men in this book got given quite a bad reputation. Almost all of them are two-timing, rapist, self-centred, egotistical male chauvinistic pigs. I didn't quite agree with that.
I don't think this book deserves the literary raves it's getting. Amy Tan did much, much better with Joy Luck Club. Go read that.
The characters were also a bit stale. I coldn't relate to many of them. They were either too selfish, or far too giving. Lee's characters weren't very likable. Like the majority of people, I also didn't like Casey Han. I found her 'wonder woman cuffs' silly. Although there was nothing wrong with her towards the end of the book, the way she kept messing up her life and those around her made me mad.
I think overall, this story does have potential, it offers an insight into the Korean American way of life, the adversities they went through, and how they have shaped their identity in the US.
Having said that, the Korean men in this book got given quite a bad reputation. Almost all of them are two-timing, rapist, self-centred, egotistical male chauvinistic pigs. I didn't quite agree with that.
I don't think this book deserves the literary raves it's getting. Amy Tan did much, much better with Joy Luck Club. Go read that.
December 1, 2007
finished this book--and, I think I finished it just so I could be really thorough in any descriptions of why I disliked it so much. Min Lee is writing in one of my favorite genres--something like the upward mobility/bildungsroman for the scholarship student, but that's about all that I find to recommend this book.
If I had to sum up quickly--this book takes itself REALLY seriously, and is INTENSELY UNHUMOROUS. Not that she has to be funny, necessarily, but this is also a book that meditates upon the problem of debt (student loan, credit card, etc.) among college-educated 20-30 somethings. Since I know debt intimately, I think you have to approach it with at least SOMETHING LIKE a sense of humor. I mean, as anyone with rolling credit card debt knows, there is something pathetically funny about continuing to pay for food and clothes that you bought, consumed, and most likely gave away, years ago. But everything debt-related that happens to this protagonist is a surprising, horrible shock to her--she, like the novel, has NO sense of humor; she's smart, and therefore automatically assumes that life post-college should come much more easily. When it doesn't, she's surprised, over and over again--and one would think that she'd get the hang of things sooner, lose the smart-girl sense of entitlement (we all have to lose it at some point) and recognize, as everyone who went to college in the '90s knows, that GPA is not directly proportional to post-college income.
Also, this book has what I will call a really moronic "porn ex machina"--if you get to the last few pages, you have that in store for you.
If I had to sum up quickly--this book takes itself REALLY seriously, and is INTENSELY UNHUMOROUS. Not that she has to be funny, necessarily, but this is also a book that meditates upon the problem of debt (student loan, credit card, etc.) among college-educated 20-30 somethings. Since I know debt intimately, I think you have to approach it with at least SOMETHING LIKE a sense of humor. I mean, as anyone with rolling credit card debt knows, there is something pathetically funny about continuing to pay for food and clothes that you bought, consumed, and most likely gave away, years ago. But everything debt-related that happens to this protagonist is a surprising, horrible shock to her--she, like the novel, has NO sense of humor; she's smart, and therefore automatically assumes that life post-college should come much more easily. When it doesn't, she's surprised, over and over again--and one would think that she'd get the hang of things sooner, lose the smart-girl sense of entitlement (we all have to lose it at some point) and recognize, as everyone who went to college in the '90s knows, that GPA is not directly proportional to post-college income.
Also, this book has what I will call a really moronic "porn ex machina"--if you get to the last few pages, you have that in store for you.
July 30, 2008
Train wreck! This book and Casey Han’s life are best described as train wrecks. I did not want to see the bloody carnage that is this book, but like any good rubber necker I couldn’t help but stare! That is the problem with this book – I did not like the characters, I did not like the book, but I could not stop reading! I’ve never experienced a book such as this – where I was engaged and intrigued to learn more about the debacle that is Casey’s life, but overall I did not like the book. I could not relate on any level with Casey’s character and she was so full of stupid mistakes and double standards it was frustrating. Casey look advantage of the generosity of so many people, but did very little to show appreciation or return the generosity. Were we suppose to like Casey as the underdog, heroine of this book???? If so, Ms. Lee missed her mark by miles.
Lee’s character development of Casey and company is weak and poorly executed. The constant bouncing of narration perspective made me feel like I was watching a tennis match – back and forth, back and forth. Lee switches perspective in mid-scene without warning. This makes for a confusing storyline until you eventually come to expect it, but damages the fluidity of the story. Did we really need to know the inner thoughts of EVERY character in this novel? What’s wrong with writing a novel from the perspective of 1, 2 or even 3 characters?
Don’t even get me started on the ending! I finished the book and then flipped to the next page. I thought “surely there must be more – it can NOT possible end in this manner!” Sadly (or may be happily, since the 500+ page love/hate relationship with this book was finally over!) it was THE END. I was briefly left wondering how many more lives Casey Han will pile up in this multi-train wreck that is her life. While I might be curious, I’m not curious enough to read the sequel (if Ms. Lee ever dares to revisit Casey and her band of misfits). Thanks goodness for the library – it saved me $15 and major buyer’s remorse (two things Casey Han knows NOTHING about!!)!!
Lee’s character development of Casey and company is weak and poorly executed. The constant bouncing of narration perspective made me feel like I was watching a tennis match – back and forth, back and forth. Lee switches perspective in mid-scene without warning. This makes for a confusing storyline until you eventually come to expect it, but damages the fluidity of the story. Did we really need to know the inner thoughts of EVERY character in this novel? What’s wrong with writing a novel from the perspective of 1, 2 or even 3 characters?
Don’t even get me started on the ending! I finished the book and then flipped to the next page. I thought “surely there must be more – it can NOT possible end in this manner!” Sadly (or may be happily, since the 500+ page love/hate relationship with this book was finally over!) it was THE END. I was briefly left wondering how many more lives Casey Han will pile up in this multi-train wreck that is her life. While I might be curious, I’m not curious enough to read the sequel (if Ms. Lee ever dares to revisit Casey and her band of misfits). Thanks goodness for the library – it saved me $15 and major buyer’s remorse (two things Casey Han knows NOTHING about!!)!!
February 7, 2024
one of the longest books i've read in a while at over 600 pages.
This book was beautiful, a page turner, and full of drama. I love how Min Jin Lee has multiple characters who affected Casey's life such as her father, mother, sister, Ella, and so many more people have a voice in the book. We follow Casey through her mid life crisis with boyfriends, jobs, work, and the harsh reality of being first gen. I really loved this book and the ending was exactly what I wanted💕
Happy reading!
Love,
Bailey
This book was beautiful, a page turner, and full of drama. I love how Min Jin Lee has multiple characters who affected Casey's life such as her father, mother, sister, Ella, and so many more people have a voice in the book. We follow Casey through her mid life crisis with boyfriends, jobs, work, and the harsh reality of being first gen. I really loved this book and the ending was exactly what I wanted💕
Happy reading!
Love,
Bailey
July 30, 2025
Na Pachinko wilde ik graag meer lezen van Min Jin Lee en ohhh, wat was dit boek ook prachtig. Om stil van te worden.
Han gaat over Casey Han en haar familie, collega's en vrienden. Over de positie van Koreanen in de Verenigde Staten, over de behoefte aan liefde en het onvermogen om er mee om te gaan. Het verhaal is intens en door en door menselijk. Rijke karakterbeschrijvingen en herkenbare situaties.
Als ik ooit een boek zou willen schrijven, zou ik willen schrijven als Min Jin Lee. Wat een talent. Ik mis haar wereld nu al.
Han gaat over Casey Han en haar familie, collega's en vrienden. Over de positie van Koreanen in de Verenigde Staten, over de behoefte aan liefde en het onvermogen om er mee om te gaan. Het verhaal is intens en door en door menselijk. Rijke karakterbeschrijvingen en herkenbare situaties.
Als ik ooit een boek zou willen schrijven, zou ik willen schrijven als Min Jin Lee. Wat een talent. Ik mis haar wereld nu al.
February 1, 2009
The protagonist of this well-told tale is a bright young woman, independent-minded, a Princeton graduate, interning unhappily in a Wall Street financial firm, applying to grad school without enthusiasm, ricocheting among boyfriends, more interested in fashions than anything. She is not quite lovable, but she's recognizable. Her Korean-born parents, living a simple hard-working immigrant life in a Korean community, are miles away from her, culturally. That's something that many of us can recognize, and it's presented wonderfully well. The plot reminds me of "Far from the Madding Crowd" and also "A Suitable Boy", as the heroine struggles through options in her life and winds up someplace that sounds "right", that we may not have seen coming. This is the best novel (plot, writing, insight, satisfaction to the reader) that I read in 2008.
February 14, 2023
Min Jin Lee has quickly become one of my most respected authors. She has important things to say, and she understands how to say them. This book introduces a sprawling cast of characters with highly developed personalities and individual story arcs. As in Pachinko, here Lee uses an omniscient narration style and dives in and out of the minds of her lead roles and those in the margins—a choice I’ve heard her say was inspired by her favorite 19th century British authors, but also by her own experience as someone who grew up so often sidelined. Why shouldn’t she, then, devote a line here or a wayward chapter there to a marginal character? I’ve learned a lot from this approach to story telling.
This book has much to say about the immigrant experience, American morality, Korean values, romantic love, and pursuing one’s dreams. To me, it was the ultimate New York novel.
This book has much to say about the immigrant experience, American morality, Korean values, romantic love, and pursuing one’s dreams. To me, it was the ultimate New York novel.
May 14, 2016
What a waste of time! I've had this book for at least of couple of years after buying it as a bargain book. I finally got around to it, thinking that it was time for a big grand epic for the weekend. This was one of those highly touted books, although I don't recall the hype when it was released.
Casey is a young woman who graduated from Princeton with no direction. She hasn't landed a prestigious job, she isn't getting married, she's living with her parents. The daughter of immigrants and she is starting to feel the pressure, particularly from her father. The book opens with an argument between Casey and her father, which ends in blows. Casey leaves in a huff, hoping to find solace with her boyfriend Jay. Who is having sex with two women when Casey flees to his place.
I'll admit, I was really turned off by the start of the book. It felt like a big info drop with setting up Casey's background and family history. Then it started becoming eye-rolling and soap opera-ish with her disagreement with her parents, finding out her boyfriend (or not) was cheating on her, and with Casey pretty much having nowhere to go.
Since I wasn't all that familiar with this book I didn't know it was supposedly trying to adapt the Victorian novel into a modern setting. Goodness, is that what the author was trying to do? The text is nearly unreadable, with far too much detail, no character development, soapy dramatics, etc. I don't really keep to any particular rule, but after 100 pages or so I realized there really wasn't much of a plot. I asked myself why I was reading this and decided to skim.
The book really doesn't get much better as it goes along. There's a sexual assault towards the end of the book, just as a warning.
I really wanted to like the book and see past the unlikable protagonist. But the author just made it too hard for me. Reading this book in 2016 made me think Casey is *exactly* what people can't stand (and stereotype) in the current millennial generation with apparently no ambition, seemingly rather disengaged with the world, and remains unsympathetic.
Skip it. I want to support diversity in publishing and thought this would be an interesting POV to read, but this is a terrible book.
Casey is a young woman who graduated from Princeton with no direction. She hasn't landed a prestigious job, she isn't getting married, she's living with her parents. The daughter of immigrants and she is starting to feel the pressure, particularly from her father. The book opens with an argument between Casey and her father, which ends in blows. Casey leaves in a huff, hoping to find solace with her boyfriend Jay. Who is having sex with two women when Casey flees to his place.
I'll admit, I was really turned off by the start of the book. It felt like a big info drop with setting up Casey's background and family history. Then it started becoming eye-rolling and soap opera-ish with her disagreement with her parents, finding out her boyfriend (or not) was cheating on her, and with Casey pretty much having nowhere to go.
Since I wasn't all that familiar with this book I didn't know it was supposedly trying to adapt the Victorian novel into a modern setting. Goodness, is that what the author was trying to do? The text is nearly unreadable, with far too much detail, no character development, soapy dramatics, etc. I don't really keep to any particular rule, but after 100 pages or so I realized there really wasn't much of a plot. I asked myself why I was reading this and decided to skim.
The book really doesn't get much better as it goes along. There's a sexual assault towards the end of the book, just as a warning.
I really wanted to like the book and see past the unlikable protagonist. But the author just made it too hard for me. Reading this book in 2016 made me think Casey is *exactly* what people can't stand (and stereotype) in the current millennial generation with apparently no ambition, seemingly rather disengaged with the world, and remains unsympathetic.
Skip it. I want to support diversity in publishing and thought this would be an interesting POV to read, but this is a terrible book.
January 30, 2022
This is an yard book to rate. I enjoyed the writing and even if the audiobook was pretty long I still enjoy it without getting bored by the length of it. The story was an interesting one and I thought I would give it at least 4 stars maybe even 5 stars. But as I'm writing this review I'm struggling a little with finding moments that hit specifically strong in my memory. All I can think of is "it was a good book". So 3.7 stars for me.
August 17, 2019
FREE FOOD FOR MILLIONAIRES is a story that follows Casey Han, a Korean American woman in her late twenties, and the Korean community that surrounds her in NYC. This book explores Casey’s struggle with financial spending, having to work in difficult work environments, dating issues, and the tense relationship she has with her immigrant parents. The story also focuses on Casey’s friend Ella who seemingly has a “perfect life” until it crumbles into pieces. This book shows Korean Americans as real, flawed people and breaks the model minority myth that is still present for Asian Americans today.
Even though I’ve always been intimidated by it’s size, FREE FOOD FOR MILLIONAIRES was worth the read. These characters are human, imperfect, and will make decisions that make you want to shake them. If you’re someone who doesn’t enjoy books with “unlikable” characters, this book probably isn’t for you. From infidelity to gambling to selfishness, these characters are frustrating but realistic. While the plot does take some major twists and turns, this book is mainly character driven. Lee’s aim was to represent all facets of the Korean American experience (not just the good parts), and this book does exactly that. I found Casey’s relationship with her immigrant parents to be especially interesting, and identified with some of the struggles she had with them. Overall, even though some of the characters drove me nuts (mainly the men), I’m thankful for the representation within this book especially since it was released in 2007 when Asian representation in literature was not as common as it is now.
Would highly recommend for readers who love complex character development, or generational stories that explore the struggle between immigrant parents and their American children.
Even though I’ve always been intimidated by it’s size, FREE FOOD FOR MILLIONAIRES was worth the read. These characters are human, imperfect, and will make decisions that make you want to shake them. If you’re someone who doesn’t enjoy books with “unlikable” characters, this book probably isn’t for you. From infidelity to gambling to selfishness, these characters are frustrating but realistic. While the plot does take some major twists and turns, this book is mainly character driven. Lee’s aim was to represent all facets of the Korean American experience (not just the good parts), and this book does exactly that. I found Casey’s relationship with her immigrant parents to be especially interesting, and identified with some of the struggles she had with them. Overall, even though some of the characters drove me nuts (mainly the men), I’m thankful for the representation within this book especially since it was released in 2007 when Asian representation in literature was not as common as it is now.
Would highly recommend for readers who love complex character development, or generational stories that explore the struggle between immigrant parents and their American children.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 4,431 reviews