“Whether one is a Christian or not depends on whether one believes the Jesus of history is identical with the Christ of faith.” (pg 7)
The issue presented here in Introducing Christianity isn’t about whether or not Jesus existed, (hint—there are independent accounts that suggest he did). The issue is really about whether or not the life story of Christ was embellished, altered and/or enhanced to suit a particular social, political, or denominational narrative.
Much has been written about the life, death, and alleged resurrection of Jesus Christ. The studies penned by evangelical theologians overwhelmingly trend towards the biblical; in other words they hold the company line, depicting the life of Christ as it is written in the New Testament gospels. Others (see
The Quest of the Historical Jesus
, Albert Schweitzer, 1906) take a decidedly different view.
In spite of what some reviewers have written about this book, the authors are not “skeptical and dismissive” on the life of Christ and the subsequent evolution of Christianity from an unorthodox cult to a worldwide religion. Anthony O’Hear and Judy Groves, at least one of which is a believer, are simply approaching their subject matter with a critical eye. For example, when the gospels emphasize that Christ’s tomb was empty, the authors point out that an empty tomb is no proof of a resurrection. Seems fairly obvious to this reader, but go ask a religious fundamentalist and you’ll get a 45 minute dissertation on why O’Hear and Groves are full of sh*t.
“THERE is not one Moral Virtue that Jesus Inculcated but Plato and Cicero did Inculcate before him; what then did Christ Inculcate? Forgiveness of Sins. This alone is the Gospel, and this is the Life and Immortality brought to light by Jesus . . .” William Blake,
The Everlasting Gospel
, 1818