"It was far in the sameness of the wood;
I was running with joy on the Demon’s trail,
Though I knew what I hunted was no true god.
It was just as the light was beginning to fail
That I suddenly heard—all I needed to hear:
It has lasted me many and many a year.
The wound was behind me instead of before,
A sleepy sound, but mocking half,
As of one who utterly couldn’t care.
The Demon arose from his wallow to laugh,
Brushing the dirt from his eye as he went;
And well I knew what the Demon meant."
(The Demiurge's Laugh)
I think there are many sides to Robert Frost, which this early poem of his exemplifies pretty well in my opinion. He's known best for his humble reflections on rural life in New Hampshire and Vermont, and perhaps often dismissed as an sentimental American rambler in the wake of Longfellow (indeed, many are probably surprised to learn Frost was contemporaneous with the modernists poets, and not an 19th century romantic). Poems like this one express perhaps his two competing drives, the simple parable of foolish pursuit in the New England woods, and the uneasy sense of the world's cosmic ineffability always just beyond the comprehension of his mind and his poetry. His earliest poems he wrote in naivite, as a layabout on his relatives' farm in Derry NH; the faint gesture at gnosticism is very appropriate for Derry, which adjoins Londonderry NH in the great cosmic irony -- two towns named after the same Irish town, one taking its anglophonic colonial variant and the other restoring its historical Irish name (decades before the North Irish Londonderry voted to become Derry once more).
The Irish connection is faint; while southern New Hampshire is now filled with Boston Irish, at Frost's time it was nearly as anglo-saxon as England itself, and the landscape had been terraformed into a perverse image of England -- all its millennia-old trees cut down (every single one of them, if you'd believe it) and replaced with hilly fields of grass and farmlands. It's only right that Frost take up as his principle theme, at least on some level, the vague irony between the commonplace platitudes of very english speech (down to the gerunds, -aw rhyming with -ar, etc) and the bizarre and deeply meaningful spirit of New England nature, its (re-growing) forests and mountains. One recalls Marianne Moore's fine poem, Spenser's Ireland, about this same phenomena of a powerful landscape overtaking the anglo-saxon mind and endowing it with a capacity for profound fantasy far beyond recognition. She wrote of Ireland, but New Hampshire is perhaps no less potent a locale, and indeed there are many similarities in terms of insane local politicians and alcohol consumption (by a significant margin the highest in the state) ... but I will reserve my theories about New England, Ireland and Atlantis for some other time.
I think the problem is that Frost may not have been the right poet to approach these themes, although he is quite right in his splendid poem "New Hampshire" in suggesting that the general lack of literary output from the state is on account of how tranquil life is here, such that there are no problems or distress and therefore no call to writing. Frost, for his part, seemed called to the task as a consequence of his life-long ambition to become a farmer, and his many failures at trying to turn up a single good crop. This aspiration is what destroys his poetry so much in the long run; the beautifully rooted tales of "North of Boston" and "New Hampshire", overflowing with local details that still persist a century later, degenerate into sterilized mediations on agricultural life, dull platitudes about the pleasantry of plants and the simplicity of farm-work that can be found in any of the thousands of dull southern pastoral poets (of the US).
Another issue with Frost is his analogues to WH Auden, being an essentially similar kind of poet (ironically simple rhymes, inversions of platitudes, narcissistic indulgence in the sweeping judgements they feel popular poets are entitled to). Frost mastered the form of the rough, naturalized blank verse early on, as well as a parodic style of heroic couplets, and rarely wrote in any other form -- as a result so many of his poems, even ones where he is reflecting on interesting subjects, read as obnoxious in their attempt to fake humor with absurd rhymes (none so bad as Auden's, but definitely contaminated with the same disease -- one of the last poems in this book I read rhymed "verbatim" with "ate him" for no reason other than to be cheeky) and, like Auden, too often debases himself by excessively indulging in platitudes when his exact intentions seemed to be to lament the deeper woes people hide behind their platitudes.
Of course, what separates Frost from AAA (Arch-Anglo Auden) is his almost Goethean sensitivity to the world, and much of why his poetry is universal is that his poetry reaches towards the metaphysical secrets of the world without having any intelligible doctrine or philosophical impulses behind them; at some points, this almost seems deliberate, with occasional hints at a profound learning and intelligence behind these works, but at other points it seems like genuine inability to think deeply that permits him this sense (particularly his political poetry surrounding his enthusiasm for The New Deal is so obviously ignorant and stupid makes me think this). This fascination with metaphysics almost sandwiches his career, being the great preoccupation of his youth with its poems about stars and nature-in-abstract, and that of his old age with poems about the morphology of trees and the secrets of the earth and sea.
The core of his work, then, is his localized prose tales about life in rural New Hampshire; "The Mountain" and "Birches" are, to my eye, unforgettable and true ellaborations of the things I can still see around me living in this state, and the sort of poetry I wish people would write more of, being genuine and earnest expositions of the types of thoughts and ideas one develops over their lifetime in engaging with the world, the actual use and meaning of language without any sort of literary imposition or intellectual pretense. Ezra Pound, in his endorsement of Robert Frost, said something to the effect of "I was traveling down a boat on a river in New England in the middle of nowhere and passed by two old men talking between themselves on the shore; Robert Frost's poetry is equivalent to a transcript of that conversation". I suppose it's in poor taste to theorize too wordily about the importance of localization in writing of this kind, and to contrast it (one way or another) with abstracter kinds of writing; but we can also think of something Pynchon says in Slow Learner, that he spent his youth trying to transpose his experiences to areas other than where he had lived, and only began writing anything of merit when he began writing about where he lived himself.
Whether or not you're convinced by this, I would prefer any reader take away from my review the polemic against anglo-saxons, a topic far less open to debate.