Rebuilding the Matrix: Science and Faith in the 21st Century

by Denis Alexander

Libro usado en buenas condiciones, por su antiguedad podria contener señales normales de uso

Genres: Science, Christian, Nonfiction

510 pages, Hardcover

First published January 1, 2001

About the author

Emeritus Director of the Faraday Institute for Science and Religion at St Edmund's College, Cambridge, a molecular biologist and an author on science and religion. PhD in neurochemistry.

Reviews

[Alan · Rating 5 out of 5]

I found this to be a wonderfully helpful book! There were some parts that I was unable to fully understand and follow but overall it was accessible.
I particularly appreciated the assertions that
science and religion are not in opposition for both are a search for truth
theism is position that has been a stimulus to science and remains the best context for science.
It was full of challenging passages and pithy quotations.
Some people may find it unsettling for it goes to places that many late 20th and early 21st century Christians would find uncomfortable, in particular his position on creation and evolution. For myself I found it refreshing in its honesty and rigour.
The book has enhanced my faith for Alexander has addressed and expressed many things that I could not adequately verbalise.

[Ian Clary · Rating 4 out of 5]

Wide-ranging book on the relationship between faith and science. Lots of history, which is helpful. Also engages with modern thinkers like Michael Ruse or Peter Singer. Makes a convincing case that science and faith are not at odds. Also argues for a kind of theistic evolution. I found the book to be too large, and some parts weren't necessary to make his case. Nevertheless, this is a good book.

[Earthboundmisfit · Rating 2 out of 5]

I was hoping for a thorough, balanced book on the relation between religion and science and this book does go some way to acheiving that.
However, I refuse to rate it highly due to the author's shocking misunderstanding of certain theories. At least I hope it is misunderstanding because if not, the author is puposely 'cherry-picking' quotes and misrepresenting other authors' work to support his own claims.
I have only read 2 of the books that he seems to misunderstand - 'The Selfish Gene' by Richard Dawkins and 'Practical Ethics' by Peter Singer. In Dawkin's case the author seems to not understand the idea that genes are not 'selfish' in the human interpretation of the word and then goes on to show a complete lack of comprehension regarding the nature of memes. The author seems to have an intense dislike for Singer and makes claims about him based on theoretical philosophical arguments made in 'Practical Ethics', although I believe others have made the same assumptions by not having a good understanding of the comparisons within the book.
Other authors are quoted and theories outlined, but I can't judge these having not read them myself. Based on the fact that the 2 I have read are misrepresented i can only assume that other authors have suffered in the same way. This probably explains why the book is no longer in print despite some very interesting and worthwhile ideas.

[Frank Peters · Rating 5 out of 5]

This is, I believe the best book written on science and faith. It is from a Christian perspective and seeks to eliminate many of the current myths about the (non-existent) conflict between science and faith. In particular Alexander uncovers the root of the Galileo mythology and with extensive references shows the actual relationship between Galileo and the Church. He also summarises the various Christian views on origins and while clearly believes his own view, does admirably at not vilifying other viewpoints (including mine).

[Marci · Rating 2 out of 5]

The author seems to hold Christians who want to do science to a different standard than he holds scientists with other preconceived theories and hypotheses, and generally seems somewhat hostile to Christianity being remotely involved in science while also trying to argue that science and faith are completely compatible and claiming Christianity for himself. I wasn't particularly impressed by this book.