Im on the fence about this one, the stories in the book are shocking enough, but the author seems to trip over himself to crow bar them all in.
Pausing stories constantly so we can get an anectdote and then coming back later is very jarring, although to be honest I dont know how else it could be done with this structure.
Although its framed as a story about detective Rosenes, a story about police corruption would be more accurate rather than being about one individual, as the number of stories almost makes him a source more than subject.
Im not sure why it was banned, although I find it odd that a certain Ivan is mentioned in this book (published 2010), Strathorn redirects the investigation, and then Ivan Tesic is charged in 2014. Are these one and the same?
Could this actually have contained information on open investigations? But I guess by the very nature of the corruption and number of unsolved murders, everything in a sense is still an open investigation..
Its served a purpose in making me want to dig deeper into Australia's organised crime.