Broadmoor, these days, is where the most evil, insane criminals are incarcerated. At it's inception it was both an asylum for those judged mentally ill, and for those who were criminally insane. After a while these two populations were separated as the former were not violent, destructive, evil or trying to escape and the latter were all of these things.
Back then it really was a prison even if it wasn't called that, as as some of the population were there for fixed terms after committing an offence and got out whether they had regained their sanity or not, and others were there 'at the Queen's pleasure' meaning they weren't getting out until judged sane, and maybe not even then. (As it is today).
There was no treatment available. So what did the asylum staff do for these people? That was just one question. Here are some others.
* What qualifications did the people in charge, from the head down, need to have?
* What were their duties, apart from guarding the patients?
* What percentage of the people were from poor, middle class or well-off backgrounds?
* Had they always been committed by courts or transferred from other institutions?
* Could they self-commit? Could a doctor or their family commit them? If so in either case could they leave when they felt better?
* How were the patients housed apart from their rooms, were there day rooms, canteens, exercise yards, gymnasiums, craft workshops?
* What sort of food were they given?
* Were they allowed furniture, books or other items from home?
* Was their work paid in any way and if so could they purchase items?
* How were they prepared for their release?
* Who judged them sane or was it matter of just saying they didn't have delusions any more?
* Were the insane treated differently from the criminally insane apart from separation? In what way?
* What constituted an easy regime as in some of the housing blocks, and what was a more restrictive one?
There were stories told of some of the patients. There was very little background to each one. Scarcely a word about their crimes. Less about their personalities. Nothing at all about their relationships with each other and the prison staff.
The author made much of escape attempts, a few successful. Why were they escaping? Because they were driven to do things by delusions? By a cruel regime, by just wanting to be out in the world? When "recaptured" (as most were) did they suffer punishment, if so what?
The book raised far more questions than it answered. Because it lacked details about people, there was no colour to it and it was a very meh reading experience. 2 stars.