What do you think?
Rate this book


400 pages, Hardcover
First published December 31, 2011
The book is titled “The Lost Art of Thinking: How to Improve Emotional Intelligence and Achieve Peak Mental Performance”. ‘Great’ I said, a book about emotional intelligence, also written by an actual doctor. And the “Dr.” matters for later on. So, Dr. Neil Nedley, as I was about to find later from the back of the book, is board-certified in Internal Medicine, specializing in gastroenterology, mental health, and lifestyle.
The first ten chapters are solid, based on CBT (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy) principles. He starts every chapter with one or more short stories about some Johns and their problems. Then dives into CBT theory and concepts. His main arguments, lines and ideas align with CBT, but I observed early on that his anecdotes aren’t entirely spot on for the CBT stuff he later tackles in each chapter. I didn’t like that some of his examples are pretty much off; like I could've come up with better examples myself for certain points. But I said to myself, ‘Well, he’s probably oversimplifying stuff so everyone can understand the ideas, or something. He must be a certified therapist or something.’ (Yes, I only read the back of the book after the first ten chapters).
Another subtle thing I observed early on was that he is using Biblical examples, but it didn’t bother me, because the examples made sense in context. I remember thinking, ‘oh, he’s a Christian doctor, I see’.
The second part of the book moved from CBT to lifestyle and health: vitamins, foods, toxins, pollution, etc., along with a bunch of studies and references. He has those throughout the book, but here especially, and logically so. Good, right? His conclusions were backed by science, and those numbers for vitamins and toxins looked like numbers. The ideas seemed alright. (I didn’t have the energy to check any of the studies presented and took them as legitimate).
But then, as the book went on, I started to have questions. He would throw his opinions here and there without the actual scientific support. I said, ‘Well, he’s a doctor after all. He must know his stuff from experience.’ But then I started to pause at the way he was using some of these studies to confirm his ideas. This became obvious when the book moved further into lifestyle topics and I started having a better idea about what he was talking about. Luckily for me, I had the privilege of completing a master’s degree focused heavily on research papers, so I got a small clue on how data and conclusions work. And he is doing a lot of stretching, even with the studies themselves.
“This study made on X people over 65 years old shows Y, so Y is generally true.”
“This study shows that mice get brain damage from listening to rock music, so it’s surely bad for humans too.” Uhm... This is not how it works... (God, the music chapter was so bad it felt like pure misinformation. Using music theory terms to sound like you know what you’re talking about while calling nearly any type of music, rock, blues, jazz, reggae, anything except religious music and classical music, bad in different ways). After the “mice listening to rock beats” thing, I realised he actually had a handful of animal studies to back up claims about the HUMAN brain in other chapters too.
A lot of correlation = causation, selection bias, and overgeneralization. And when I say ‘a lot’, I am not talking about ‘the majority of’, but enough to matter.
The religious examples also started to increase more and more, and finally, in the final chapters of the book, the curtain fell. The final chapters are pure religious teachings. The chapter about truth? There is only one truth, found in the Bible, of course. With all the immorality and the state of the world today, we need to seek the Bible for truth because our minds are no longer capable of distinguishing it. Also “Is it any wonder that the truth has become a blur, when our lives are so filled with fictional entertainment?”, he concludes, after a paragraph in which he states that movies are “technological wonders that stimulate our senses and try to trick our minds. How come people who aren’t married act like they are married, people who are alive play dead, surgeons who are not surgeons performing miracles with a scalpel?” Yes, they are called actors and, according to this book they are bad and trying to trick our minds.
He also started comparing CBT with biblical material. Look, Jesus used CBT principles here, see? We didn’t invent it; we just discovered it 2000 years later. Check how “The following chart demonstrates how the biblical "Love chapter" (1 Corinthians 13) effectively corrects the ten cognitive distortions central to CBT”. The overall feeling I got is that he is saying that CBT derives its validity from Scripture. He validates the CBT principles through a biblical lens in the final chapters, completely disregarding the science and theory from the first chapters.
The last two chapters felt like I was reading my weekly Bible study. (Yes, I am a Christian as well, but what was that?)
Why does my book about Emotional Intelligence end up sounding like a Bible study? Isn’t this a textbook definition of bait and switch? The book presents itself as science-based, medical, psychological, and written by a doctor. Then it slowly shifts from CBT → lifestyle → theology. Feels like an ugly move. Not very ethical to camouflage the message like this. Ironic too; if God is truth, why hide Him behind science?
I feel like I’m making the book sound bad. Normally, this would be subjective, but in this current format, yes, it is objectively bad. If it were called “A Christian Perspective on Mental Health and Lifestyle” or something like that, I wouldn’t have such a big problem with it. But as it stands, it is actively, and probably intentionally, misleading.
(Not to mention how on the back cover it claims he treats resistant depression and anxiety and has written another book on depression, yet his handling of depression here is questionable. He also has some program treatment he keeps advertising throughout the book. Depression is discussed almost the way my mother would talk about it: drink water, get enough light and vitamins, exercise, and use these CBT techniques. It makes it sound like you can handle it yourself. The only times professional help is mentioned are when he directs you to his own program or website. From his whole ideology and ideas presented in the book, I wouldn’t be surprised if he is anti-medication for depression. Just my humble guess though.)
From me, it gets 2 stars for the first two-thirds of the book. The early CBT theory suggests he actually consulted proper CBT textbooks, which is a positive.
TL;DR
Solid CBT content at the start, then a gradual slide into weak science, stretched studies, and finally full Christian theology.
Some of the studies seem misused, correlation is treated as causation, and the book ends as religious teaching despite being marketed as science-based psychology. If it were honestly labeled as a Christian mental-health book, it would at least be an honest starting point — but as it stands, it’s misleading. 2/5 stars.