I'm...puzzled. From everything I've read, Simone is lauded for rich believable characters. From what I'm seeing here in early chapters, there's a tendency to use three-syllable words when something shorter would do - which makes the characters seem a little theatrical rather than believable. And I'm also talking about the beefy villains, who unless I'm missing something are just typical muscle and not Rhodes scholars with a hormonal imbalance.
This tendency isn't consistent - in fact, the characters are known to switch from soliloquy to goombah within the same page. It's like a slight case of split personality, or perhaps Simone is making a case for the clear effects of the just-completed fistfights on cognitive abilities.
I like the easy interactions between Dinah, Barbara and Helena. They feel a big staged (like they know we're watching, and tone down the animus just a little) but there's still heart beneath the text.
You know what I find weird? So much of the plot revolves around Dinah being tied up, and not having much success to wrest control of her situation. I don't know why this stands out to me, but I have a couple of thoughts: one, the fact that the pose affords us maximum opportunity to get a full view of her rack. Two, that nearly any male character in a similar comic-book predicament would pull something out of his ass and we wouldn't think twice about it. This feels...odd from a proto-feminist writer.
Also didn't appreciate the full leering shot of Huntress hanging upside-down, with no perceptible change in boob conformation. See boobsdontworkthatway.com if you've never understood this odd phenom.
I am trying really hard to enjoy this book - in fact my liberal/feminist lifer card pretty much demands it - but I'm having a hard time connecting with these characters. "Do you think because I know which wine to order with trout I won't slit your throat?" Geez, this guy sounds like a bad Showtime "thriller" villain, not a real person. I know how many people appreciate the characters of strength and equality that Simone writes, but I don't actually find myself enjoying them that much. That hurts - I feel like I'm missing out on something here. Points to Simone for taking a couple of shots at the stupidly sexist costumes though.
It isn't until the heroes start snarking at each other that I begin to smile. THIS feels lifelike.
And surprisingly, just at the end, I start to actually care. The conflict between two of our heroes actually sets up a struggle I'm interested in, and it carries through quite a number of pages even. Makes me wonder if Simone was having growing pains when starting on this book. Makes me *just* interested enough to peek at the next book. Don't let me down Gail.
Benes...NO. I'm sorry, a close up of Huntress' crotch from below? What, do you have a private upskirt collection? This is plain disgusting and not befitting a story where feminine power is a subtext. WOW. Benes does have skill in drawing clean panels and stages action pretty well, but he simply doesn't have the temperament for anything but an exploitation book (which I guess means I'm not surprised he draws for DC).
2 for most of the story, +2 for showing potential at the end. +1 for clean art, -2 for egregious misogyny.