Beauty in the Stillness was very thoughtful and lovely read.
I terms of diction and technical quality, it was very easy to understand. The kind of book you can finish in a sitting and feel accomplished having done so. I can see it being very appealing if approached in that intention. This had a very similar feeling to Rupi Kaur's Milk and Honey, where you're offered a stream of consciousness that mimics our own in syntax and diction. I quite loved her passages that explored stillness: not what it means, but offering it in a very effortless way. Those moments were eloquent and endearing. They were very enjoyable to read, and where I personally felt that 'beauty in the stillness.'
However, philosophically, the collection of ideas are very much centered around having a positive outlook on everything or giving it purpose. It's highly optimistic, and motivational in that way. But in that, sometimes the tone felt a little unrealistic or ignorant to the practicality of our modern problems. Poems titled 'life is meant to be enjoyed at every moment,' didn't resonate with me. Though she explores the purpose of pain and it's importance, she also tends to almost expect... you to view tragedy in a happy light. And though it is purposeful to consider the lessons hardship brings us, it is also okay for it to be.. not okay. To simply grieve without intellectualising the process. The reality of that I felt was not prevailed enough to take a lot of this seriously.
A quote to explore what I mean : )
<"If we simmer too long on negative feelings we endure- depression, anxiety, stress,... these cues show us that our current lifestyles, experiences, and mindsets are not serving or feeding our souls.">
Depression and anxiety are not 'feelings.' The word choice whereby they are 'endured' only brings forth a guilt in the reader by implying it to be a choice: not being able to "feed our souls" better, to fix a chemical imbalance in the brain.
As someone with depression, I certainly didn't feel this to validate me or empower me.
Much of the narrative explored was to do with autonomy over our lives. The "if you manifest better and see the good in it, it is purposeful and you'll grow," kinda feeling. But what about the reality that not everything is within our control? Not everything is an opportunity to grow? It felt very much like stillness was being conceptualised as something that needs to be productive. And the consistent use of second person made it feel like I was being told to see it one way.
I tend to gravitate at towards literature that offers an experience and lets you extract the meaning from it. That's why I loved her poems that depicted this stillness. Those I adored. And though this perspective may be practical in another season of my life- and absolutely be productive for others- I had a hard time connecting with it.
What this book brought forth personally, was perspective on the periods in our lives where we feel behind. It wasn't exactly self-help to me. Perhaps the flaw is in my expectation for it to be! It was easy to understand contextually, but personally I couldn't grasp a lot of the philosophies brought forward on the matter. It made me reflect on the ways that we all may require different mindsets to grow. I am certain this was effective and worked for many people. And wether or not it worked for me, it was still lovely to get to dive into someone's personal methods for success. : )