There was so much that I liked about this book, but it felt like the author tried to push so many extra things in that did not fit that it was really hard to read.
What I loved:
I love her take on eco-theology/eco-spirituality. Her pulling out agrarian and ecological themes throughout the Scriptures was beautiful and really thought provoking. The exercises she suggests at the end of the chapters were really great ways to engage with the ideas of eco spirituality and go deeper into our own ecological communities.
What I didn’t like:
It felt like she included diverse voices just to say she included diverse voices — even when they did not fit her own assertions. It felt very much like the Native American/Indigenous authors she referenced were in the original form of the book, but the added Liberation theology and Womanist writers felt like an editor said she needed to add more and they were shoved into where they sort of, but not really, fit.
What I really didn’t like:
For everything amazing about the eco spirituality aspect, there were so many instances where the basic facts of church history and theology were either misrepresented or just plain false that I really had a hard time reading this book. Maybe it’s because I studied church history, but I think not knowing the difference between Augustine and Pelagius is a big issue. I get what she was trying to say, but to make assertions that Augustine didn’t believe in grace and Pelagius did is just incorrect. Add to the factual inaccuracies of timeline and what liberation theology actually teaches, and I just had a hard time trusting her conclusions.
Overall, I think it’s an interesting read, albeit one where I had to take the good and leave the bad quite a lot. I feel like if all the unnecessary bits had been left out, she would have had an amazing book, but as is, 3 stars.