A book full of bad examples and contradictions. Must I have to endure more American civil war and American sports examples? Someone who can’t stop playing baseball even when injured has no discipline - it would show greater discipline to recover from those injuries, rather than keeping going just to be ‘great’ or to do what he enjoys. Ryan suggests a lack of deep thinking by poor examples like this.
Also, it would be nice to have non self-centred or non career examples. How about personal life struggles or people who try to do good, rather than ‘leaders’, athletes and the like? It isn’t very relatable to most of us.
The book is really just for writers and other privileged people who do (as work) something they want to do. It isn’t for most of us that do a job to support our families and have bosses, it’s for those who are bosses. Ryan shows no awareness of how the world works - most of us work to live and don’t live to work. How about discipline for everyday life and happiness, not discipline to make you a ‘leader’?
Sports analogy? Boring. Old American political analogy? Boring. Can’t Ryan give an analogy that actually resonates with real people? Sports athletes are not the most well balanced: they do it all for themselves and not at all for the greater good, so this is the worst example for Stoic virtues.
He talks of ‘managing the load’ (ie to rest so that you can work when it counts) after giving a chapter talking about Gehring who didn’t rest and worked with broken bones and seemed to praise this absolutely insane desire for winning and disregard for the long term effects….just one contradiction in a book of many.
Constant contradictions, such as saying ‘oh you must sit until the task is done even if your eyes water and your legs go numb’ but also earlier discussed moderation and the importance of rest. Does Ryan even proof read? It all just reads like catchy sound bites - sounds good but no substance behind it.
Don’t get me wrong, I like Ryan. His podcasts on Stoicism helped save my life in a really dark time. He makes this ancient philosophy relatable and understandable and I thank him sincerely for this.
He talks about the importance of focus, giving the example of someone who couldn’t focus on conversations because they were too focused on something else - clearly this is not focus!
Constant analogies about writers, sports people, politicians, soldiers, these do not exactly relate to the average human. These aren’t what most of us are, and he also seems to focus exclusively on work rather than personal life - which is really what matters. At the end of our life will we think ‘I wish I had worked more’ or will we think ‘I wish I had worked less and seen my loved ones more’. Ryan’s obsession with work life and ‘leadership’ doesn’t get the balance of life right - it isn’t the key to a good life at all. A workaholic has no discipline.
He talks a lot about how to be ‘great’ and the ambition to be ‘great’, and given that this book series is supposed to be about the Stoic virtues, this is not at all Stoic. Being ‘great’ is not something you have control over, nor is it something that actually creates a good life. Do normal people care about being ‘great’? No. We just want a good life. Most of us aren’t writers, athletes or politicians - we have bosses, normal jobs, people above us and do not have the luxury of deciding when to work or how to work. Ryan seems very out of touch with what a normal person is, he is too focused on his Silicon Valley type Stoicism to actually see what real Stoicism is.
You get the impression you have read this book before.
This sentence says it all and says why it isn’t relatable: “people who are doing less important things than you can get away with not being in control”. In other words, Ryan is only talking to powerful people or those who think they are important, he isn’t talking to normal people who have bosses and normal jobs. We’re not all privileged writers, athletes or others who’s career is just about them. Most of us work to live and maybe even want to help others (rather than the athlete who just helps themselves).
He makes Stoicism about work success but it should be about self improvement, which can then lead to work success.
Ryan’s earlier series (Ego/Obstacle/stillness) were decent books but this series is just a bunch of books with ‘motivational phrases’, trying to call people to somehow want to be leaders. The normal person just wants happiness and contentment, leadership is over rated and he aims only at a small percentage of the population with these new books.
Copious battle and war analogies…how will that help anyone? Just what I need when I have a personal issue, to think of some ancient war. Very relevant!
Ryan gets more and more unrelatable. He seems to just use examples of what he is interested in (sport and war…dull much?)
Ended reading this book at page 287 as I couldn’t take the boredom anymore. I won’t waste more of my life with this drivel. Sorry Ryan.