It’s a good day when I learn something new, and I did immediately upon starting to read this book. The concept of a placebo is part of culture. I learned about it in first year Psychology, in 1962. And yet, it was originally dismissed as pseudoscience, and researchers like Professor Howick needed to fight prejudice and disdain to demonstrate its veracity.
Empathy and compassion shine out of this book, much of which is case vignettes of very real-feeling people. I have witnessed the kind of uncaring attitude by medical professionals Howick wants to get rid of. Someone developed diabetes as a result of chemotherapy, and this was seriously affecting her vision. The oncologist’s attitude amounted to “It doesn’t really matter, you’ll be dead soon anyway.” This is the nocebo effect: a self-fulfilling prophecy. Fortunately, the target of this uncaring attitude reacted by changing oncologists.
And it does no harm at all that many of these stories will give you a laugh.
The purpose of the book is set out in a passage worth quoting: “This book is part of the second revolution in placebo studies. The second revolution requires collaboration between doctors and other healthcare professionals, healthcare managers, as well as other groups ranging from hospital designers to patients. Doctors who wish to enhance the care of their patients by taking the science of placebos and nocebos into account can use this book as a manual. Medical researchers who need to make decisions about the ethics of placebo-controlled trials and how to reduce unnecessary nocebo effects can use the book as a guide. Philosophers of medicine and ethicists interested in recent advances in placebo studies can get a grasp of the field in a single, readable volume. Hospital designers who wish to organize their spaces in a way that reinforces what doctors do can be inspired. Policy makers who wish to organize their institutions in a way that promotes patient and practitioner health can find evidence to support initiatives which achieve this. The science in the book can also be used to improve the quality of anyone’s interpersonal communication and relationships” (pp 13-14).
I guess I qualify as a patient in this listing, but then so does almost everyone. And it is written in plain enough language for any intelligent person to understand it. All the same, it is an academic book, in two ways. First, everything is meticulously referenced. Second, though, is the only negative I found. When I was an academic, one of my jokes was that scholarly writing is a (usually) polite form of bickering. Much of the book is just that. Howick presents many of his points in a highly effective manner: he puts forward a number of alternatives, then has an argument with those favouring one view after another, leaving only his preferred interpretation. My reaction is to want to give his dismissed opponents a chance of reply rather than full conviction.
This, however, is a minor point. Reading this book will improve your ability to help yourself and others, to cause good and to avoid doing harm.