This behemoth is about Ireland in the colonial context and the many different identities both inside Ireland and within the diaspora. There is an entire genealogy of colonialism/imperialism outlined in chapter two of the first section, that is quite a clear takedown on the British Empire and its many horrors. It would be an understatement to declare that the British Empire irrevocably ruined the world. This book also goes into the very tedious account of various political moments in Ireland's past, and also does a relatively good job at explaining how the partition between Ireland and Northern Ireland has had consequences still not accounted for in contemporary times. The authors are very intentional in contextualizing Irish history/colonialism with an international focus on shared struggles, and the Unfinished Revolution mentioned in the title is meant to be taken as the global one against imperialism. How the colonial past and ghosts of empire have worked their way into the 'liberal' Western world is pretty obvious, as these authors lay it out for us to see.
Besides the readability of this text, such as the gratuitous use of footnotes, my handful of complaints are directed towards the authors' obsessive attempt to appropriate the term mestizaje in application to Ireland. I found this repeated demand incredibly misguided (and rather long-winded). There is essentially an idea here that mestizaje will create a third race in a post-colonial world, where no one is purely settler or purely native of any place. I cannot quite articulate why I found this such a ridiculous idea, but needless to say, I disagree with this analysis. Perhaps because I cannot get over the idea that mestizaje was a term created in Latin America for a specific reason, and to use it as a global context misses the mark entirely. I also found that while the idea of the Irish having the concept of 'whiteness' imposed upon them is interesting in a colonial context, the authors try (foolishly) to explain how the Irish must 'unwhite' themselves for liberation (?). There's other terms I wasn't so sure about in this book either, such as the phrasing of the American Revolution as an 'anti-imperial' struggle (?) or the footnote that refers to Pakistan and India as Black dominion (??). Overall, my frustration is all the focus this book diverts away from Ireland. And for all the struggle within it, the pivotal battles such as the hunger strikes or any various uprisings in the twentieth century get utterly sidelined to footnotes and in passing, as if we as the readers should already know the details.
This book starts off by explaining it's not a history book, not a political one, but to be honest, I'm not sure what else this book is trying to be. It asks a bunch of rhetorical questions in the end and answers practically none of them. I'm still happy I read this because I did learn a lot of history, but I think the authors should've minimized their scope so that a reader could have a clearer idea of what they just read, and most importantly: why.