Lorna Shadow is a girl who can see and communicate (somewhat) with ghosts. Her best friend accompany her on various jobs, most in the richer parts of society and has had jobs all over Europe. They land themselves with a job at a manor, where it soon becomes clear that a murder has taken place; or so the ghost insist is the case. So the books plot is basically about Lorna, Helen and Flipper (Lorna's precious dog) finding out what actually happened to the ghost.
This is very much a cozy read, and while I did enjoy it, there are some improvments that could be made.
First of all, I have to excuse myself for being a bit knitpicky with some of these things - it's more or less my nature.
So here's why I rated this book 3 stars.
The book could have used some line edits. Though I didn't find many typos, there were a few places where better words could have been chosen. This is not the main issue though - what disturbed me most was the Helen sidekick explaining many things twice when it wasn't needed and could be shown. An example of this is when she says that they talk about money in the office (not going into further details, as it might spoil something).
I might have gotten this wrong, but I thought this was a book of a puzzle mystery type, but the clues and threads aren't that clear. They just happen to stumble upon them from time to time, in a very convenient manner. This made me halt in reading as they said "now we have even more suspects" and I thought "not really" counting back the characters mentioned and discovered they had already ruled out two. There were more 'red herrings' as they call them which I would see as dead red herrings from the start as no one had any relations to these objects or a reason to be related to certain occurances.
Characters:
The book was a cozy read because of all the likable characters, but looking deeper there are a few things that lacked and which could have been done better.
Lorna: Lorna is a likable girl with some self-respect and values, but these could be deepened and explored further. She never reflects on something that has happened, which, for one, makes the pacing flow quicker but also makes me not care as much for her as I would if I got to know how she reacted - I need something to relate to, not just 'she's a nice person, it would be too bad if something bad happens', I want to feel like 'Nooo, cmon girl! You can do it! I want you to live, beat the bastard down!'. I would also have liked a bit more backstory to her - especially since she's the MC of a coming series. All I know about her backstory is how she got her power and some tidbits about her previous jobs (not counting her relation to Helen). I would also have liked to see some personal growth, and some flaw which she has to struggle with. Her fear of water is mentioned once, but never acted upon.
Helen: Helen was likable as well, but she was more like a Watson character without the narration. She stated some obvious facts, but I felt she didn't contribute anything to the story as a whole.
Douglas and Karl: Sure, every story needs a bad person in it, but every person has at least something good to them as well, to make them believable. These people doesn't seem to have any good points at all (and Douglas' paintings manifested themselves as another failed plan in my mind - not much compassion there). No person is mean just for being mean (a + for the lady of the house showing something likable and complex, an even more complex person than all the rest of the characters in the book).
Zach: A believable character with appropriate and believable reactions, but we know nothing of his background. This gains another + from me, as there's something like love developing at a believable pace.
All the characters' backrounds could have been more developed (trust me, the author doesn't have to (and shouldn't) cram it in there, but we as readers know it if there's a background planned for the characters, it seeps in through-out the story and makes it more engaging.
Another thing to work on are the characters' voices. This might be a minor thing that doesn't disturb as many, but I like to know when a certain character speaks through how they speak. As an example (a bold, and maybe exaggerated one) I would look at the speaking patterns in Harry Potter, between Hagrid, Harry Potter and other characters in the book. When someone speaks, you often know who is speaking without having to read the tag.
The house keeper: Was talked about maybe three times, seen once and then disappeared to nowhere.
Ok, enough about me rambling on (sorry for this review - it has turned out more of a note to the author than to future readers). To the last, specific point.
Ending: The ending was underwhelming. Though the MC can 'talk' to ghosts, she (and me) had no idea what or how or who until it all spills out in the end. The clues were nonconsistent and didn't add anything to actually figure out what had happened. No one had a clear objective to have done it, and the explaination (though intriguing) didn't tie back to basically anything that we learned though the rest of the story (some could be thought to have been, but only appeared at the 80% mark into the book). This made me feel cheated, especially since everything spillt out in the end. The story behind what happened was intriguing, but it could have made for a better book if those things explained had been strewn around in the story more.
Summary: A cozy read. More slice-of-life where there happens to be ghosts involved. I love stories with ghosts and people who could see them, but if you're looking after a mystery in which you can follow the clues yourself this might not be your book of choice.
However, if you want a cozy light read with some feel-good and some humoristic elements in it (and some ghostly manners (funny pun in the title, as regards to the ghost's manners)) this might be a good fit for you.