First and foremost I want to say that this review is not so much of what happened in the book (plot wise), but more in line of the things that didn’t happen in the book (and actually during all three books WLU , FLU and ILU).
I don’t really want to get into plot points since I think the problem really lies within the characters themselves.
Let me explain.
KBR have always felt like very character driven authors to me, to the extend of plot not really mattering and being secondary to how the characters relate to the plot and other characters on page.
That means that their characters feelings, thought and behavior takes center stage and the plot is only used to highlight those aspects of the story.
Now this is all well and fine by me (I myself am looking for books with this dynamic) and I think that KBR have done a good job so far in that sense of letting the characters shine and using the plot as a tool to make the characters known to the reader.
I said “so far” and what I mean by that is that the line is clearly drawn between CLU and WLU.
If we take the characters before CLU into consideration we can see a lot of good characters development and use of plot.
For instance for Moffy and Farrows books (even if not my favorite couple by far) have always felt real and organic to me. I have sensed Moffy’s anxiety and his overwhelming fear of not measuring up to the standards set by society and himself. I have felt his struggels to come to terms with who he really is and how he wants to be perceived. For me, Moffy is one os those characters that has so much growth in him, in a way that sadly Akara, Banks and Sulli lack.
Farrow falls into that same category for me, he is arrogance and witted and a bit dark, but fiercly protective and very mature. I have always felt that from Farrow, that his maturity really shines through.
Now Jane and Thatcher were maybe a bit less impressive in that sense, but I do have to say that they only had two books to Moffy and Farrows four. Not a fair fight by all means.
Jane and Thatcher both have a sense of truth to them, a sense of belonging to the rest of the family, of existing outside of their plot and way to the end of the book.
I never once felt with these four characters that I was reading something less than real. It was a enjoyable read, with lots of honest and faulty parts on all sides.
And while I do criticize Moff’s hero complex (Charlie was spot on in my opinion), Farrow’s arrogance, Jane’s insecurity and Thatcher’s hypocrisy, those are all thing that are actually discussed and dealt with, not only by the characters surrounding them, but by the characters themselves.
The characters actively work on bettering relationships, themselves and others as well. Moffy makes a real effort to understand his cousin Charlie and helpBecket with his drug use. Farrow actively fights for a relationship with Thatcher and maintains the one he has with his Yale boys. Jane fights to find her voice and her strength.
And here lies the problem I have with ASB (Akara- Sulli- Banks).
1. Sexist trope: From the moment we meet Sulli she is a driven, ambitious, determined, forest loving, adventure seeking girl, with gold medals under her belt.
She is just retired from that and is on a quest to find herself, make a woman out of herself.
I find it very disappointing that the journey for a young woman to womanhood is into the arms of not one, but two men.
I, as a young woman myself, am disappointed in Sulli’s journey. Not about the plot point, about the chapters and any of that. I am disappointed in the way that she has no visible maturity to her and has only “found herself” to be strong and an adult when she found her men.
For me one glaring example of that is her “friendship” (and I use that term very very loosely) with Becket.
She claims to be BFFs with Becket for forever and have always been. They shared those traits I mentioned earlier and had a common goal: be the best at what they did.
We do not get any depiction of that friendship at any point, the only thing we get to see is how it breaks in SLU over Sulli being judgmental and hurt over not knowing a secret form her alleged BFF.
Afterwards their relationship is fractured, until the plot demands Beckets to explain to her what a ploy relationship is using M&Ms (thanks Becket you sweetheart).
After WLU (where Charlie had to literally blackmail her to get to talk to her “best friend”) there is no development in FLU on their part. The have some conversations that I could have with a lady on the morning commute and nothing much else. Now we are at ILU and… has anyone seen Becket? Oh yes, there is a conversation at the end that sets up Beckets romance some more. Also some stuff about people drifting away. The End.
What I want to say is that there is a lot of telling and no showing at all. Not once have I actually felt that Sulli was even remotely interested in Becket’s problems, worries, hopes and dreams. Not once have I heard her wonder how he is doing. Is he struggling with his cease of drug use? How is the ballet going? How is your OCD? Have you made it to all Wednesday night dinners? Can I come over? Can I hang out?
The fact that Sulli tells Luna first, just because her book is next in line feels like a cop out.
Becket has only been a tool to be used to further along Sulli’s plot lines. And that does not make a friendship.
The overarching problem here is that there is a certain trope developed here: The girl who gets a boyfriend and forgets about her friends.
Now, Akara and Banks get to keep their friends, sure there are some ripples and some distance, but there is a core value in those friendships that feel very real to the reader.
But Sulli doesn’t, Sulli looses her BFF, but since she has two men now, she doesn’t need him anymore. Frankly it is quiet a sexist thing, more so coming from two female authors.
2. Lack of character development:Not only Sulli, character development is also lacking in Banks and Akrara, but Sulli is supposed to be the star of this book..right?
So Sulli does not try to work on her relationships, she does not make an effort to actually understand people and their actions. She judges them based on some moral high ground that only her and B and A walk on.
I think that is really what maturity is, making sense that not everyone in this world will be on your side always, that while people make mistakes and are faulty, they are also good and worthy. And if someone does a fucked up thing that doesn’t make them bad or evil, it makes them human and someone who chose differently than you for reasons that you may know or may be unknown.
Sully and also B and A lack that sense of wanting to connect to other people. They seem to only exist within their bubble where they decide who is right and who is wrong.
The fact that she is doubting if Charlie has a heart, based on if she gets to benefit from his actions is very childish and small-minded.
The triad is very cliquey and immature, to a level where A and B actually have a dislike for Charlie for just being different and faulty.
I am very disappointed in Thatcher as well when he says that Charlie is his least favorite. Not only is that very unprofessional but it shows a level of maturity that should be much higher at this point.
The problem with ASB is that they have that small town mentality of “they are either with us or against us” and the whole dynamic makes them look like little kids playing dress up. There are no shades of grey in their universe, so there is no point in talking about anything, thinking about stuff… it’s either yes or no. And if that is a correct or incorrect response is up to the three of them to decide and judge.
You also see that depicted with Sulli’s swimming idol Kingly, when he says something in an interview, he is automatically labeled as an “asshole” and not only is that terrible in itself, but A and B also back her up in that.Oh god.
I see a lot of judgment from their camp, a lot of not wanting to comprehend other people.
3. No introspection: And the third problem is that none of the motivations come from within them. The plot can be used as a tool to develop the characters, by all means, but that shouldn’t mean that they have no introspection whatsoever. I see very little thought into important questions: who am I? What do I want? Where do I go? What does that mean?
They only think about the things happening around them and the things that others say and do. There is no real thought about themselves. Also a point of immaturity and selfishness.
I think it is very ironic that the people who proclaim to be the “nice” and morally right characters and also the most selfish, self centered and narcissistic of them all.
I am glad that their books are over, and I have high hope for Luna and Paul. May their characters be able to grow and learn and hurt and feel and forgive and regret as much as necessary. Sulli, Banks and Akara didn’t have that chance and will forever be flat and forgettable.