Elkind’s storytelling effortlessly transports readers into a world where each step unveils a new layer of beauty and meaning. The book’s unique premise, centered around the act of walking, serves as a metaphor for exploration, both external and internal, leading readers to discover the intricacies of the human experience.
I bumped on her judgment of people. It felt unnecessary to write about a woman’s “dyed-black/blond hair.” Why not just write the color? There was also a description of “creepy people” - without defining what she meant by that that felt awkward and uncomfortable. At this point I wonder to myself if I would pass her on the trail what her thoughts would be of me? This takes me out of the read. She mentioned that she had utilized therapy in the past, so I have compassion for her - as I do all writers. Her anger and control issues (with her husband) are clear, and (in her defense) so is her mature love for him and the time they are sharing. What I don’t see on the page is her self awareness of her (current) flaws beyond worrying. Childhood issues are written about and her self-compassion has brought her to a place of some clarity, yet as she writes about a desk clerk giving her a “funny look” she defends her ego by saying her French (or lack thereof) is causing her (the desk clerk’s) confused expression. Why not just say confused in the first place? It comes across as insecurity - as does her mention of wondering what people are thinking about her. My guess is they were thinking about their day, the mountains, food, family, challenges of their own, etc. Writing is hard.
The “judgement” of the landscape (aka, her prose) is eloquent yet it feels like she passed back through inserting similes and metaphors at spaced intervals.
Besides valuable details about some elements of how to navigate the trail as they did, there was an additional gift in her writing: I decided if I ever try to write a blended travel essay and personal narrative I will strive to make a pass at editing with her writing style in my mind and leave out (hopefully) the pieces that did not feel inclusive.
All in all did this book inspire me to consider walking the GR5? Absolutely. Would I recommend it to a book club or a friend, probably not. I shy away from writing a critical review because I admire her ability to complete such an adventure, yet I feel compelled to write this as an exercise in my own personal “judgment” of a fellow author and adventurer. If projection is my issue here, and I come away thinking I need to work on my judgment of others, then she gets a gold star for writing something where the reader has grown from the book. Just as she developed new insights and deeper self-awareness from the GR5, I did as well.