3.5. On paper it presents multiple sides of the conflict, but its main sympathies are primarily with the American veterans. It’s understandable of sorts given its likely target audience, but it feels off for a history of what is often understood as a civil war amongst different sections across Vietnam, for it to focus so much on humanizing the foreign actors instead of the many local ones. And when they do get into Vietnamese stories, such as those of the South Vietnamese (who were allied with the U.S.), the descriptions of their suffering are often framed in the context of how much help they received from Americans such as from soldiers and medics or how grateful they were for being able to later migrate to the “greatest country on Earth.” Those of the North don’t get similar expressions of sympathy. In a chapter, a line or two will mention in passing how some of North Vietnamese women were found to have been brutally raped in a certain village, but then when it’s time to describe how Americans suffered, the descriptions would go on and on in great detail, occupying whole chapters.
It’s not a bad or inaccurate lecture series on the war, but it’s very imbalanced. The fact that it opens up calling the Northern soldiers the “Viet Cong” or “VC” (an epithet, they never called themselves that) and continues to do so through the whole series, exposes its biases upfront.