'From about 13,000 BC it began to get warmer in Europe..' begins this all-encompassing survey of European cultural history. This book is a major and original contribution to the idea of Europe and its formation, from its Celtic and German origins, the influence of the Greeks and the Romans, the role of Christianity and the fruitful, if sometimes bloody, contacts with other cultures such as Islam. Peter Rietbergen portrays Europe's history as a series of four grand phases of continuity and change set in the context of political, social and economic developments. A large selecton of illuminating excerpts are included to support the arguments. Europe is comprehensive, thorough and highly readable, and it will provide a stimulus for discussion among students and general readers alike.
This was a very textbook-textbook. Dense so dense. Its really interesting and this was my favorite course this year but this was dense. Have i said dense? because it was DENSE.
So obviously we had to read this for the University but that doesn't mean it wasn't interesting. The thing is just that if you don't have a general knowledge of Europe's history, you might miss a few details. Jumping from one century to one a few centuries in the future and back to something else: tenth, to seventeenth, to twelfth and so on is sometimes difficult to keep up but rather useful when it comes to the examples that Rietbergen makes.
I kind of missed the information about some kingdoms, I am lucky that I had a small idea about it and have a history-loving brother, but for example Rietbergen speaks about the Holy Roman Empire from 800 to 1806 but suddenly it has a different name which will be the Carolingian Empire and if you read a few times over you will understand what he means but at first glance for me I was totally confused why the empire suddenly had a new name, yet the old name was till 1806.
Apart from minor things like that I felt like I learned quite a bit more about the history of my continent.
Begrip van de geschiedenis is de enige, echte ervaring waar wij mensen op kunnen bouwen. Simpelweg kunnen we als tijdsgebonden wezens alleen hierdoor (herhaling van) fouten voorkomen. De wereld en maatschappij is een megagrote versie van het eigen leven van een individu zoals ik. Ook daarin is de focus het heden (leef in 'het nu', weetjewel), om met lessen uit het verleden een eigen toekomst te scheppen: een combinatie van oud en nieuw. Peter Rietbergen's inperfecte boek zette me op het gezonde pad van waardering en begrip van onze gezamenlijke diverse waarden, gedachtes en cultuur.
A very good, enjoyable, scholarly read about the cultural history of Europe (or better, of the history of the "idea" of Europe). It might have been a 5-star, but I ended up giving it 4 stars for the following reasons: - the initial part (dealing with the culture of the Classical World, in particular when dealing with the Roman Civilization) is definitely not of the same quality and depth as the rest of the book. - I disagree with some of the perspectives and conclusions of the author, which I do not think are warranted by the actual historical developments (recent or not): a) the author claims that the European culture and common heritage have been, until recently, an "elite" phenomenon, and he supports this claim by using the argument that the large majority of the population had little or no formal instruction (until recently). I seriously question and challenge this approach that conflates cultural heritage/culture and formal education levels: culture and cultural heritage are not developed and transmitted just and exclusively through the formal education process. b)The author (page 463) is conflating/confusing physical/geographical aspects and cultural aspects when the states: "that Europe might return to its Mediterranean, partly Asian-African, origins is a fascinating thought". The cultural unity and relative homogeneity of the classical Hellenistic-Roman world, which did encompass geographical areas outside Europe, was breached by the Muslim invasions of the 7th century. I am not giving it a judgment of merit, I am not saying that it was a good or bad thing, just stating an historical fact. c) The author, in the same page, is claiming that among the group of Islamic Europeans secularization will inevitably become stronger. This might be wishful thinking, I see no clear evidence of such process of secularization. Actually it appears to me that the Muslim world itself is struggling to cope with the opposite problem (just see what is happening in some countries like Egypt). d) The author, again in the same page, is overstating the challenges posed to Eastern Europe by the integration with Western Europe after 1989. Actually, this integration has been progressing surprising well, which by the way also demonstrates the common cultural heritage of Eastern Europe and the rest of Europe (which the author does not really appear to fully appreciate). And, I would like to add, Russia as well (which the author neglects to consider in depth, which is a pity considering the deep historical, religious and cultural links between Russia and Europe).
Regardless of this, however, it is a very good book, highly recommended to everybody interested in the cultural aspects of the historical development of European identity.
Read it for a class. Interesting way of explaining how the European culture has developed itself but no further comments on the textbook. On that note though, the writer did not do a great job on writing in different perspectives. His and only his way was present while reading, perhaps I am a tad disappointed.