This book was an absolute slog, and I honestly don't think it needed to be. It's not a textbook, the paperback copy is the size of any other 'regular' book. And it's not as long as it looks because 1/3 of the book is dedicated to notes, citations, and index. But it really felt to me like it was something that should have been an essay or report but was instead dragged out into a book length project. It is not for lay people with its more niche field language, but Hanssmann's writing style is both repetitive/circular and vague. Over the course of several paragraphs in a row I felt like I was reading the same couple sentences over and over, and despite each sentence being very clear what was being referred to (ex. 'activists, advocates, and some practitioners' always used instead of 'they' in any instance where it might be confusing who 'they' is talking about), it basically just made the writing dense with words and jargon and convoluted in content/meaning.
I think the purpose behind the book was good, and the overarching themes of each chapter were fine. But if the whole book had been written in more straight forward prose like the conclusion chapter was, it would have been easier to understand things on a deeper than surface level. That said, I also think huge chunks of the book could have been removed just in addressing the sheer repetition of sentences and themes and the point of the book itself still would have remained, and perhaps been clearer during active reading.