John Hirst appears to be very much part of the history/culture wars in Australia, but gives the impression that he is some kind of ‘independent historian’ with a bit of a larrikin thrown in. His contributions to the problem of just what might be expected in regard to being an Australian historian are discussed early on; and part of the problem lies in the very ‘youth’ of the nation, trying to come to terms with itself after only a couple of centuries in existence. (The question of the thousands of years of Aboriginal realities is almost a separate consideration, especially since Australians didn’t even allow them to be counted as Australians until the second half of the 20th century!) More significantly, this is occurring when the very concept of nation stated is universally under threat.
Traditionally, nations have relied only on written texts to identify ‘national’ concerns — and with Australia, its unique origins as a convict colony of the British empire, its more modern appropriation of American cultural values, and a more virulent and vibrant concept of multicultural assimilation of citizens from many other nations, there is some tension between all these conflicting ideas and with finding its own identity, especially with trade options being increasingly dominated by deals with the Asian nations in our region. Some traditionalists want to ensure that there is a comparatively straightforward narrative curve covering all the variants of modern Australian history. Hirst argues that this is not possible, nor relevant to Australia’s peculiar situation. His preferred method is to deal comparatively simply with different, but specific narrative arcs on specific subjects, and he provides this by writing historical essays which reflect this.
This book, then, is a collection of a number of Hirst’s essays, each of which is more or less confined to a particular subject peculiar to the Australian mystique. The effect overall is to provide lots of interesting, and sometimes controversial comments which are intended to overlap one another: something like numerous strands of an historical fabric, all providing different contributions to a presumed pattern that is difficult to decipher overall. Each of these strands appear to suggest a number of very unique elements characteristic of ‘Australia’, and anyone not familiar with all of these will find Hirst’s approach very beguiling and informative. In this regard Hirst is most successful when dealing with purely factual events, but in my opinion less so when he succumbs to personal re-evaluations and criticism. One does not necessarily need to agree with everything an author writes; and he does have the right to his opinions, anyway.
I can’t help feeling that Hirst is more concerned here with establishing ‘Australianness’ as an enigma. Perhaps he is right, at least insofar as today’s Australians in general ‘know’ who they are, but in reality are unable to pinpoint exactly what that means. Perhaps this is also the only true way to attempt to understand the present situation.
The final essay is entitled A Republican Manifesto and it was written in 1994, perhaps the earliest of all the essays collected here. By reissuing it here, and placing it at the end, Hirst is probably suggesting that unless and until Australia becomes a Republic, its ‘enigmatic’ nature will remain unresolved. I agree with him on this issue; but while there is still a very strong emotional tie with things British, Anglophiles in Australia (who represent the dominant culture) are constantly on the alert to preserve British values (to the extent of refusing to allow any criticism whatsoever of the British). As a result, despite the fact that to all extents and purposes, Australia is essentially an independent nation, we are still tied dependently to Mother England’s apron strings. It seems as though we want to believe that Australia is Britain’s great gift to the world. While that feeling remains, Australia cannot possibly learn to stand firmly on its own two feet and fully assert its own uniqueness and independence. Significant British and American values we value will not die as a result, but at least we will then have a better idea of who we are and what we stand for. As it stands now, we can’t even agree on getting rid of the Union Jack on our flag, which identifies us as a British colony, and come up with a universally accepted but uniquely Australian flag of our own.