In Zach Weinersmith's 2023 retelling of the Old English epic poem Beowulf (of the first third, that is), in his Bea Wolf, the warriors of the early Middle Ages are replaced by tribes of children who want nothing more than to eat candy, drink soda and just enjoy being kids, and with Beowulf's dreaded monster Grendel transformed in Bea Wolf into the fun-hating, sensitive to and against all noise middle-aged disgustingly vile and misophonic curmudgeon Mr. Grindle, who lashes out against all childhood fun and whose magical touch (from his long fingers) can rapidly age children directly into either teenagerhood or adulthood (sounds tame enough on the surface and not really all that problematic, I guess, but no, in Bea Wolf, this scenario is most definitely and repeatedly shown as pretty much all encompassingly horrid and as something that therefore needs to be relentlessly fought against, and with Mr. Grindle therefore also being depicted by Weinersmith's text and Boulet's images as a monster-like enemy par excellence, as an infernal and demonic entity who absolutely needs to be destroyed and neutralised by Bea Wolf just as much as Grendel does in Beowulf by Beowulf).
But first and foremost, Zach Weinersmith's retelling of Beowulf presents a lot of textual fun, featuring much whimsy, much delightfully silly contents and thematics, which both children and equally so adults should enjoy (and with French cartoonist Boulet adding equally light-hearted, often visually cute and adorable black, white and grey hued images of child kings, treehouse courts and toy-wielding warriors, although I do tend to find how Mr. Grindle is illustrated by Boulet a bit too overly exaggerated and creepy for me personally, but well, that is probably done on purpose and to visually demonstrate just how different and how inherently negative, how much of an infuriating kill-joy, how utterly despicable Mr. Grindle is compared to the children he so despises). And yes, Bea Wolf often makes me laugh and giggle (out loud) at both Weinersmith's words and at Boulet's accompanying artwork, at how text and illustrations in Bea Wolf combine to make delightfully satirical commentaries on the shifting interests among different stages in life, such as for example regarding the horrors of facial hair, on having to shave, how being surly and cell phone addicted, how bow ties, anger, being obsessed with money, careers, with the news and even with healthy eating, with boring vegetables instead of candy immediately descend upon the children as simply one touch from Grindle’s long, bony fingers totally ages them (and how unlike in Beowulf where many people die horrible physical deaths from Grendel’s claws and teeth, well, in Bea Wolf, nobody might actually die, but that being cursed to artificially age too quickly is definitely a type of spiritual death and destruction as well).
And yes, although this book is marketed as a graphic novel, in my opinion, Bea Wolf is not really told with sequential art, in so far that Bea Wolf is obviously Zach Weinersmith's story, how it is always his words that primarily drive the narrative (and which I actually hugely appreciate), that while Boulet’s images very nicely and most adeptly accompany what Weinersmith is verbally presenting in Bea Wolf, they act more like a mirror, and are as such not on the same level as the presented narrative, that Boulet's images are aesthetically delightful, full of details and visual personality, but that for me Bea Wolf reads not so much like a comic book but more like a richly illustrated children's story with detailed artwork that reflects but does not ever take over from what is verbally being shown.
Now and finally, with regard to Zach Weinersmith's writing style for Bea Wolf, yes indeed, I do really enjoy how he and like is the case with Beowulf, with the epic poem being rewritten, uses many alliterations and kennings. However, my verbal delight regarding the latter notwithstanding, I do wonder if this could get a bit textually overwhelming for younger children, and that as such, I do think that children younger than ten or elven might find Bea Wolf potentially a trifle difficult and maybe even occasionally somewhat tedious and in particular if reading Bea Wolf independently (so that parents and/or teachers should be aware of this and to therefore consider reading Bea Wolf aloud with younger audiences and equally so in short and manageable chunks). But yes, for me, the combination of Weinersmith's text and Boulet's images in Bea Wolf has been absolutely delightful, rates as solidly four stars, and with the detailed, engagingly penned and enlightening supplemental materials regarding Beowulf, Zach Weinersmith's writing process etc. both being very much appreciated and also upping my star rating for Bea Wolf from four to five stars (and that I also kind of wish that when I had to read Beowulf for school in the early 1980s, a fun and engaging retelling like Bea Wolf could have been available).