Over de esthetiek bevat de kunstfilosofie van Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831) in een notendop. Esthetica is bij Hegel niet enkel een verzameling subjectieve bevindingen, maar iets waar op systematische wijze over kan worden nagedacht. Uiteindelijk is het de filosofie die de waarheid van de kunst ondubbelzinnig kan uitdrukken.
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831) was a German philosopher and one of the founding figures of German Idealism. Influenced by Kant's transcendental idealism and Rousseau's politics, Hegel formulated an elaborate system of historical development of ethics, government, and religion through the dialectical unfolding of the Absolute. Hegel was one of the most well-known historicist philosopher, and his thought presaged continental philosophy, including postmodernism. His system was inverted into a materialist ideology by Karl Marx, originally a member of the Young Hegelian faction.
یونان، یونان، یونان! همش یونان! همه چیز از یونان آغاز میشه، در یونان اوج میگیره و در یونان به پایان میرسه! اوج شعر، یونانه! اوج رمانس، یونانه! اوج حماسه، یونانه! آغاز، اوج و پایان فلسفه در یونانه! هر حرفی که فیلسوفها تا الان زدن، جوابی به ارسطو و افلاطونه! هنر مُرده! به پایان رسیده! هنرمندان و تفکر هنرمندانه از ۳۰۰۰ سال پیش تا الان پیشرفتی نداشته که! بخاطر این تفکر یونانپرستانهی هگله که تمام فلسفه و هنر اروپا انگار توی یونان باستان گیر کرده و نه تنها حاضر نیست سرشو از توی کاخ رویاهای یونانیش بیاره بیرون، بلکه ادوار بعد از اون رو حتی قبول هم نداره؟ فکر میکنم آدمها همیشه ترجیح دادن یک چیز گنگ (در اینجا یونان باستان) رو به عنوان خدا انتخاب کنن و بهش سجده کنن و توی ذهنشون مدام بهش مقام بدن. اگر هم تو بخوای اعتراضی بکنی، یا بیسوادی و به اندازه کافی مطالعه نداشتی یا اینکه شعورت اونقدر پایینه که "سخن بزرگان" رو نمیفهمی! موقع خوندنش خونم به جوش اومده بود و توی رگهام قلقل میکرد! حقیقت تلخ اینجاست که تو به عنوان دانشجوی فلسفه باید این مزخرفات رو مطالعه کنی و سعی کنی بفهمیشون. بعدش حق انتخاب با خودته؛ یا این حرفها رو قبول کنی و در جامعهی فلاسفه مورد احترام واقع بشی، یا بهشون انتقاد کنی و مثل شوپنهاور از این جامعه طرد بشی و افسردگی بگیری! حقا که فیلسوفان در زندانِ فلسفه، در همان غاری به سر میبرند که افلاطون ما را از ظلمت آن میترساند؛ جایی که از حقیقت جز در پیکر سایههایی بر دیوار نمیتوان باخبر شد...
Ik startte dit boekje niet voor mijn plezier, maar raar maar waar, raakte ik na een tijdje doorbijten toch wat meegesleept. Hegel blijft complex, maar Francis zal tevreden zijn
I'm gonna have to read this one again someday, preferably in a philosophy course at school - but don't get me wrong, I felt that I understood the otherwise clunky and obscure text well enough - I simply would like to partake in discussions regarding the subject matter. I'll take up some more Hegel soon, I think. He has an intoxicatingly grand view of the universe and our role in it.
Not the easiest read ever, but extremely insightful! Even now, after two centuries and countless revolutions in the philosophy of art, this book has a lot to offer. Some ideas may be out of date and are fascinating more from the historical point of view, but many of Hegel's thoughts still hold to this day, and couldn't be expressed better.
I recently read one of the most challenging texts in the Western philosophical canon, Hegel's Phenomonology of Spirit. As an extension of this accomplishment, I decided to reread an earlier, and from my observation, less-cited Hegel text, Lectures on Aesthetics, which my Barnes & Noble edition calls The Philosophy of Art. The composition of the text is fascinating. Unlike Phenomonology of Spirit, one of Hegel's students, Heinrich Gustov Hotho, compiled Lectures on Aesthetics from Hegel's lecture notes. This textual mediation feels distinctly Hegelian. Furthermore, there are moments from Lectures on Aesthetics that echo ideas Hegel develops in Phenomonology of Spirit. For example, when Hegel writes, "The Beautiful is now no longer poured into external formations, but has returned from externality into the inner consciousness of the individual mind" (29) sounds similar to how Hegel conceptualizes the infinite, which is to say, we must think of the infinite as grounded in the finite.
As I mentioned earlier, this Barnes & Noble edition has more than Hegel's text. It also includes an essay from one of Hegel's students, C. L. Michelet. This essay, which is longer than Hegel's text, functions as an "extensive elaboration of Hegel's ideas" (vii). The inclusion of Michelet's essay troubles Hegel's text, if for no other reason than it misleads readers to think Hegel's text needs Michelet's. That is to say, Hegel's Lectures on Aesthetics and Michelet's essay need not be a package deal, but the editor's inclusion of Michelet's text and the naming convention The Philosophy of Art, suggest otherwise.
I rate it low only because the book is advertised as Hegel but not even half the book is Hegel. More than half is another philosopher. I bought this book to read Hegel, not someone else (one of his students apparently). Will have to buy something else instead.
But the section by Hegel is interesting, although he fails to anticipate innovations in art. for instance, Hegel says music improves upon painting by introducing the concept of time, which is a limitation of painting. but cubism specifically does innovate to introduce time into painting. So I don't think Hegel has in this book captured the progression of art toward it's highest form adequately.
Penetrar no universo hegeliano da arte e da estética configura-se como o início de uma viagem por um imaginário fascinante. Há muita sabedoria em Hegel e há ainda um elemento de premonição que é surpreendente. Por vezes, todavia, também há uma certa fixação e limitação em redor do tal imaginário hegeliano que circunscreve o potencial de alcance do seu pensamento. Não obstante, trata-se de uma obra muito interessante e cativante.
Sorprende la discreción o falta de desarrollo del concepto "estética" aunque el registro de su desempeño atreves de su escalada exposición arquitectura, escultura, pintura, música y poesía es brillante y esclarecedor para quien atiende a lo que realmente describe esta escalda. Aunque sigo curioso por su discreción en el desarrollo conceptual, tal vez sea mera elegancia y respeto ante el respetable. No espetaba esto aquí pero vaya que siempre Hegel deja algo en su inmenso trabajo.
... Güzellik ve hakikat bir anlamda özdeştirler. Güzel, özellikle kendi içinde hakikat olmak zorundadır. Ama hakikate ve güzele daha yakından bakıldığında onların aynı zamanda farklı olduklarını görürüz.
...Çünkü otantik sezgi ve iyi yetişmiş bir ruh, yalnızca hakikatin ve temel olanın karşılığı olan gerçekliği fenomenler içinde kantlayarak ve göstererek beğeni duyar.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
stephen dedalusla tanıştıktan sonra artan estetik sorularımdan sonra hegelin estetik düşüncelerini ilk elden tanımak istemiştim. kitap uzun bir süre önce elime hediye olarak ulaşmasına rağmen daha yeni okuma fırsatı bulabildim.
Okumasi agir kitap, cevirmenin kotu cevirdigini dusunuyorum. Yarim biraktim. Okucak cok kitabim var sonra belki geri donerim. Tavsiye etmem. Vakti cok ,okucak kitabi olmayan guzel sanatlarla ilgili arkadaslar okuyabilir.
Mimariyle başlayan sanat, heykel, resim, müzik ve söz (şiir) ile devam ediyor. İdea olarak sanatın özü vurgulanıyor. Öncelikle doğada var olan sanattan bahsediliyor. Daha sonra modern sanatın ilkeleri ve varoluşu anlatılıyor.
Zo een filosoof die dit hele boek in 5 zinnen had kunnen neerpennen, maar door zijn voortdurende shizzle heeft dit mij weken gekost. Ik haat Hegel nu meer dan de persoon die statistiek heeft uitgevonden.
An argument beginning with the belief that Art is imitation of Nature and ending by stating that Art has reached its logical end. Covers the Beautiful, the Ideal and the Divine. Heady, but good.