When I was a child, I read Cherry Ames books and wanted to be a nurse. My mother objected to this-- why don't you want to be a doctor?-- seeing it as unfeminist. As a result, I remembered the Cherry Ames books as being unfeminist.
But reading this old volume, set in the 1950s, I see how they were a big step for young women. These books showed young women leaving home, taking on a career, even moving to the big city; dealing with issues (such as landlords, janitors, and transport) on their own; interacting with other women about work; being respected for the work they do; and feeling that their work was important, even as important as the men in their lives!
Cherry and her friends got to the big city and take an apartment in Greenwich Village, having been accepted to work for the Visiting Nurse Association. They are professional, caring, and independent young women, who also are social and even have beaux (at least some of them). Their jobs demand a lot of mental and physical energy and work from them, and they enjoy their work. In fact, Cherry hooks her love interest, Wade, who appears on a trip to the city after several months, into helping her with several projects and hanging out with her friends, though as he points out he really would consider spending every moment with her, just her, the pinnacle of his trip! :) (Cherry's father wonders why Cherry won't just stay at home, but her mother supports her in working.)
The interesting details of (sanitized) Visiting Nurse work in the 1950s add a little spice. This series is absolutely recruiting propaganda for various types of nursing (nobody dies in Cherry's care in her 3 months as a visiting nurse as far as we can tell, and there are no bugs), and I can see it would have worked. There's a lot of paternalism here-- the settlement house, the visiting nurse association telling people how they can help themselves-- and yet the VNA and the settlement houses did help people, and Cherry and her cohorts are depicted acting the way we want social services to act now towards the elderly, sick and lonely.
Are there stereotypes? Absolutely. The kind grocer who worries about the lonely shut in in the district and whose wife is always trying to feed Cherry? Jewish. The policeman? Irish. Are there any blacks? No. One of Cherry's classmates is Chinese-American, but that's as far as it goes. This is a period piece, whitewashed and sanitized; and yet it is, for its period, quite progressive. Compare it with, say, Call the Midwife and you'll see the bones, I think. So, 4 stars for effort in its period.