Somewhat worth reading, although his view of the theological landscape is pretty narrowly informed in some aspects.
By that I mean he has a bit of a postmodern, sensationalist flavor to his understanding issues of Christian doctrine. He often plays fast and loose with some significant theological principles and even attempts to pit modern Christian writers against the Bible (quoting C. S. Lewis out of context to trivialize sexual immorality, despite Paul saying quite explicitly that there should be no grounds for even accusations of sexual immorality in the Church [Ephesians 5:3]).
He is greatly influenced by an egalitarian model of marriage, and that biblically inconsistent stance finds its way into this book.
He goes out of his way (to no apparent end) to endorse the feminist renegotiation of Galations 3:28 to be read as an annulment of gender based hierarchy instead of a statement of equal opportunity of access to God through Christ Jesus (formerly only free, healthy Jewish men were permitted into the inner court of the temple).
He also trivializes sexual immorality, reducing the cause of extramarital sex being forbidden in the Old Testament to its being “linked to idolatry.”
Coming from someone who also talks about sin as negative epigenetic programming via repeated behavior, I expect better thought through (and researched) explanations.
Extramarital sex is evil because it weakens pair-bonding ability before marriage (fornication), and weakens an established pair-bond within a marriage (adultery). Unfaithfulness injures the trust and love of a spouse, thus exponentially increasing conflict and destroying the wellbeing of the household.
It’s also possible that - in your fornication - you may unknowingly violate someone else’s marital vows (if the other person is married and doesn’t disclose it).
It is also a poor portrayal of Christian selflessness and self-control to the World.
It is a very grave matter, and Eitan’s haphazard treatment of the issue calls into question whether his wisdom is to be trusted, and whether there is some un-repented adultery in his past.
****************************************************
There are other more minor doctrinal errors, but I’m not here to pillory Eitan.
In fact, though I disagreed with some (okay, a lot) of his writing, it is a book with a few worthy takeaways.
The core issue is important and worth understanding: God is NOT a cosmic monster who was was overjoyed to brutally murder his own son.
That is only one noxious facet of the warped “gospel” of the Reformed sect, which portrays God as a monster through many heterodoxical doctrines, especially theistic determinism (“Calvinism”).
A further point for his case that Eitan overlooked or was uninformed about, is that the Septuagint (which predates the Masoretic text by quite a bit - over 1,000 years) does not render Isaiah 53 as a proof text for Divine Abuse.
It says simply that YHWH “willed that He should be crushed.”
Some of his scholarship is a bit questionable too.
He tends to stretch the conclusions of studies or applications of verses to fit his needs.
He does a good job of laying out the different theories of the Atonement. I really enjoyed that part of the book. He does have some really solid points to make.
In summary, you’ve done decent, Eitan, though you need to stop trivializing sin that destroys souls.
Whatever sin you are running from, turn and face the music like a man, and repent fully.
I appreciate your effort, and hope you’ll keep writing to reach Christians and Jews.