I have often said that “The Prisoner” was the only objectively good thing ever produced for television. While other television programs are entertaining, and have varying degrees of subjective value for their viewers, only this single 17-episode series (or mini-series) ever actually achieved the status of Art.
That’s deliberately provocative, and obviously impossible to defend, but it makes the point of how strongly Prisoner fans feel about their favorite show. “The Prisoner” dealt with contemporary social issues such as prejudice, the national security state, technology’s ability to dehumanize, peace and war, but so did other programs, such as “Star Trek.” What made “The Prisoner” stand out was that the entire series was cast to bring to light a fundamental philosophical question: the tension between the Rights of the Individual and the Needs of Society, and it took a decided stance on the side of the Individual. So far as I know, no other program has done that; certainly none has done so with more success.
And so, as the authors of this book observe, the show has produced more literature than would seem normal for a show that only ran for one season in the 1960s. They claim (although I’m not sure I agree) that most of this literature is of a “scholarly” nature, and that this book is a more accessible product. It does, however, deal with the symbolism and philosophical questions of the series, if only in the sense of framing questions which readers can explore or discuss for themselves in greater detail.
The main reason I picked it up was for the alternate orders it provides. Although the series is only 17 episodes long, one of the great debates is what order they “should” be viewed in. It was broadcast in different orders in the US and UK markets, and shot in a different sequence altogether. Certain “hints” in terms of continuity suggest that none of these orders may have been the “intended” order. Finally, since the original shooting script only called for seven episodes, it may be that there is no truly definitive “correct” order for the other ten. This is the sort of esoterica that Prisoner fans thrive on. While the book is labeled as “official,” happily the authors do not attempt to resolve the issue once and for all, but merely list the production order and the US screening order, and then discuss some of the criteria used to devise alternate orders.
In general, that is the tone of the book. It is not a final word on anything, but a way for fans to begin their search to find more discussion of elements that interest them or that they would like to grapple with. It has many high-quality stills from the series and includes some original production notes, including the original proposal for the series. There is much here for a fan, and it would be a good “companion” for a first-time viewer as well.