This work elaborates how a contingent of celibate bishops—Athanasius of Alexandria, Gregory of Nyssa, and Ambrose of Milan—who debated the divinity of the Son were simultaneously negotiating manhood. Like Brown, Burrus highlights not only the instability of masculinity in late antique Christianity, but how the Christian bishops of the 4th century became anxious to prove their masculinity as they gained an unprecedented and, perhaps, unexpected amount of state power.
Whether in Athanasius’ portrayal of the corruptible, material body as feminine and the transcendent divine as masculine, or in Ambrose’s depiction of feminine hysteria as justification for male authority, these figures appropriated traits traditionally associated with femininity to construct a new model of Christian masculinity. Burrus’ aim, thus, is to “add something significant to what we ‘know’ about trinitarian theology, gender, sexuality, asceticism, episcopacy, and Christianization in late antiquity and the relevance of these historical phenomena to our own lives and cultures.”
To this end, Burrus captures how shifts in the state’s relation to ecclesial power often placed celibate bishops in new, powerful positions that demanded rearticulations of how a celibate cleric could hold such power.