Biography tends to be regarded somewhat askance among academic historians, particularly those working within universities and institutions of higher learning. And that is a pity, because so much of history as a popular source of knowledge of nations, countries, and world events comes to us through that filter. And then there are works such as Tim Jeal's, which lift the genre to an even higher estimation.
Jeal's work on the Nile explorers of the nineteenth century is that important. It revises the assessment mostly handed down for the past 150 years or so of John Hanning Speke as an opportunist who stole the glory appropriately belonging to Richard F. Burton. Jeal shreds that argument apart through his investigations of Burton's and Speke's own works and the heretofore unknown documentation now available from recently discovered archival material, manuscripts, and writings. What emerges is a portrait of Speke as an irascible individual who promoted himself rather poorly. Yet he is seen as someone who is also forthright, dogged, and possessed of a strong moral sense. The same cannot be said for Burton, who Jeal successfully proves spent a lifetime building a publicity campaign attacking Speke while generating undeserved praise for himself.
That is at the core of the book. There are also chapters on Stanley and Livingstone and Samuel Baker. Jeal makes the case that each man, even Burton, was sincere in their opposition to slavery. And their proposals for free trade and commerce were built upon a true humanitarian desire to see central Africa develop the means and strength to protect itself from slavers. Jeal doesn't hold back on these people's shortcomings, but he gives them their dues as men interested in projecting their faith and sincerely seeking out knowledge for the betterment of mankind.
In achieving this goal, Jeal also neatly delineates between this era of exploration and adventure and the one that immediately came after, the so-called "Scramble for Africa" and inroads made into Africa by European imperialism. They are separate ideas, according to Jeal, with the exploitive commercial nature and power politics of the latter era desperately different in motivation than the decades in which Livingstone, Stanley, Baker, Speke, and Burton actually hoped to intervene to stop an evil practice, slavery. For those interested, an even greater revisionist effort is put forth in Jeal's subsequent independent biography of Stanley.
If there is one weakness in this book, it comes with the last two chapters. For some reason, Jeal goes off on a tangent and writes about "what if." He spends too much time fantasizing about what could have happened had British policy in particular been different in Darfur and in Uganda, the area designated as Equatoria. If only a separate Equatoria had been carved out, muses Jeal, then perhaps there would have been no Sudanese civil war and perhaps no Idi Amin in Uganda. Too much irrelevant speculation, here, because it didn't happen. Still, a landmark history of Africa and Britain's role, there. And written with fairness.