Crass author whose writing lacking Grace.
I sometimes wonder for what if reading such authors make me go philistine. Such a boorish writing it was, with no sense of factual delegacies in maintaining the pride of the land go fair. My first doubt was on the so-called ‘brilliant Sanskrit scholar’, who was credited for the research on something, which never happened. In addition, for the fact-checker, what he had done to support this writer is completely questionable as well.
There was no proper usage of language, to which, I opposed always. This is not some BDSM novel where abuse can work well to appease the readers. Raavan’s screaming out loud of “YOU SONS OF BITCHES!!” was firstly grammatically wrong; secondly doesn’t suits the language of the level of Scholar he was. One must be very careful while retelling the real stories from past to maintain the decorum of language and the actual aura of those ancient people from those times. Amish’s main focus was to degrade Lord Ram and Maa Sita to mere mediocre humans who are even below normal living citizens from that time and to make Raavan, the biggest villain.
There is no doubt in knowing already that Raavan was arrogant and aggressive but be full of foul words and actions was unacceptable. To guide his younger brother to bed multiple women was so mean for the kind of person Raavan was, as per any real manuscript available in this world.
Custom official were there at that time, wow. To make tax system work and to show that there were bribe systems to harass people was quite incomprehensible. It was ‘Treta Yug’, and to know why such names had been given, based on the division of these epochs, would be enough to tell author about the bad and good there were. But his main focus was on showing crimes, to lead readers in the direction of wrong information on their ancients. ‘Shortage of wisdom in the ruling class of the Sapt Sindhu' was a big allegation. Saying ‘trading community continued to be persecuted’ was in itself an enough evidence that Amish was completely thinking like a banker rather than the writer who research first then present anything. His complete view was from the perspective of a corporate finance person.
Foreign dealing with Arabia, Malay & Cambodia? Those lands were not even called such then. Great sage ‘Vishwamitra’ was also mentioned as more a merchant than who is actually is. His complete aura of being one of the wisest saint of that time was maligned by making him a profit booking broker/dealer who shown to have thrive on the buyers’ kindness; and for what, Making ‘Daivi Astra’? Sages of that time used to have their own laboratories and money was not in culture directly. In addition, all such Sages’ labs were funded heavily by the land Kings to make it the better for their own Empires.
Kalinga was the empire came into existence and with its own name during ‘Dwapar Yug’ (Third Epoch) not ‘Treta’ (Second Epoch). Either Amish must have make his own language or atleast build his research team better for that case. Even if he was trying to fictionalize “THE RAMAYAN”, he should have read some books from ‘J.R.R. Tolkien’ for reference.
He wrote about ‘Jagannath Temple Shrine’ of Puri, Odisha. He must have learned well that this temple was built in ‘Dwapar Yug’ not ‘Treta’. Moreover, this Mahanadi was called ‘Nilotpal’ as per “Vayu Puran”. In addition, Chilika lake theory must be inspired from ‘Hirakud Dam’ but to fiction only and not in real sense, yet again.
Killing of man from his own daughter brutally was today’s world theory and not from that era. Amish’s quench to settle course with public issues must be done with better non-fiction anthology. There was no need to fictionalize the ancients of our religion, the Gods themselves.
“But who cares about dharma these days? We have forgotten our traditions and culture. We are an embarrassment to our ancestors.”
This aforementioned quote shows how much illiterate knowledge & thoughts Amish is carrying. Firstly, that was Treta Yug in which 3/4th of the world followed Dharma (answering my own rhetorical question raised before). Secondly, what traditions & culture had they forgotten? That was the time in which those ‘Ways of livings’ were become lifetime cultures and pattern to live for epochs to come.
‘Panchatantra’ was written by ‘Vishnu Sharma’ during the reign of Mauryan Empire but here under the enlightenment of Amish, it was way before ‘Ramayan kaal’. And yes, the way Lion & Deer story put, was dumb.
In addition, ‘There is nothing “arya” about them, no real nobility.’ it was epitome of dumbness. Even this word’s evolution got in the world in 18th century. There was no kind of that thing in that era.
‘Lead India back to greatness, make it truly Aryavarta once again.’ Here again one more corpse of illiteracy and ignorance over the pile of it. It was never Aryavarta at that time, also, even if he called it India (which was ‘Bharatkhanda’ actually); it was greatest of all from all the contemporary worlds already.
His quoting of ‘A country that cannot honour its heroes doesn’t deserve to survive.’ yet again went wrong. Well, we always did and still do honor our heroes.
Raavan living in the oblivion of his memories with Vedavati. What a non-sense thought that was. Just because you have to describe some character for making money does not mean you write wrongly about anyone. The whole Ramayana was not about Ram but Raavan... His vengeance to defeat Bharatkhand for some girl he met in childhood? This gives look of more a Kollywood movies than the real work on ground acts from that time.
Even “Kalidas” with his renowned work ‘Meghdoot’ was during or before Ramayan time. LOL.
‘Kaikesi’ was so good to feed her half children but ‘Vishrava’ one of the greatest sage, was bad for following righteous path of dharma shown to be with doubtful integrity and womanizing. This was complete leftist act on giving fame to bad ones and malign the image of real heroes. Hence that was the point where it was said we do not celebrate heroes.
Social Issues of gang rape and brutal killings were put like they were prominent from the on. I believe he never learned anything from facts but some crumbled mindset of people who must have told him things that couldn’t be present in the time when females were worshipped. Wicked ones like ‘Manthra’ were kicked out from kingdom but not literally but (kicked) hypothetically. And, that’s same for all disregard of genders.
Raavan was shown as one-sided lover rather than a man who himself on his decades of worship and focus made him what he achieved over time. Every time on any situation, Kumbhakarna was reminding him of Vedavati. Wine used as if it was made to be in use since then. ‘Somras’ that was in culture was much different to Wine and must have been used by name as is to atleast made a connection.
Ravan calling name to his mother was beyond imagination. He lived away from his father for facts (because both parted ways due to different cultures they adopted considering Kaikesi from “Asur” family and sage ”Vishrav” from the family of Lord Brahma) with his maternal side of relatives along with his mother. He worshipped her and never ever disrespected her, but for Amish he was disobedient son as well. Also, there was none that comes under ‘human code of conduct’ as mentioned in this book for ‘survival of the fittest’.
Amish’s deception of the fact that there was a lineage that ruled for many years and took over the responsibility to protect the people says enough of his bigotry from the truth and keep his family lineage better without naming it. Hiding the term doesn’t always make it better. That is also a ‘Sophistry’ but to very less in knowledge to Amish. For him Kshatriyas were the tormentor of Shudras and Vaishyas, but to make his pea-size brain enlighten I must highlight that ‘Varn System’ came into existence with the Kalyug’s evolution of modern civilizations, say ‘Mohen-jo-daro’ and ‘Harappa’. He very cleverly opt-out the ‘Shabari incident’.
Potato-egg theory was so cheap to be taken from some WhatsApp message. He should have been more creative while giving examples.
Raavan’s picking of Lord Shiva’s bow “PINAKA” was merely some joke or over imaginable thought that Amish's mind processed. Just because you want to present something in retelling of Epic a new, doesn’t mean you go around screaming untruthful tomfoolery. For the facts, Raavan never picked or even touched the ‘PINAKA’. He straight forward went on to did the same but got the vision of Lord Shiva who blessed him while folding his hands in respect before picking it and guided him meanwhile not to do the act for it was not meant to be for him in accordance to the well before written per cycle of time. There was no hero like act on his reaching for the bow in “Swayamvar” (a ceremony from ancient India where women have the rights to choose their husbands as per their choice basis on the act their part-of-family decided to perform to prove their worthiness). No crowd cheering on Raavan’s movements, but to make him the biggest Villain, as if inspired from Bollywood movies, he unnecessarily emphasized on things, which could be added as am amplifying flavor to bad façade of Ramayan’s Antihero. One moment he was calling sage ‘Vishwamitra’ ‘pompous nutcase’ and another moment calling him “Guruji”.
There seemed to be psychological issues with Author who himself couldn’t figure out for what he want to actually present to his readers.
At once Raavan was having biggest naval carriers of the world and at another, there were questions on whether his boats could even carry tortoise shields. Seriously? There was not even a cross-check on minute details of the script. Moreover, there was exaggeration on Maa Sita’s fight with Raavan’s soldiers. Firstly, to be very straight, there were set rules on war or even clashes/fights with someone. Queens/Kings or Princesses/Princes fought with their counterparts only, not mere soldiers. Secondly, as I highlighted, it was all exaggeration and there was no such fight.
Amish’s whole world so very much affected from the maligned Bollywood and that crumbled his brain for its ability of think fairly. For him everything is about a love story and even in explaining that he failed to put it through smoothly even for a lie. First, there was Raavan-Vedavati; then there were clashes he wrote about Vishwamitra-Vashishtha for a girl. For him, those most learned and celebrated sages for their knowledge from the ancient history (whose lineages are also still present) were on each-other’s throat for a girl. It is not just a book but also his mindset that needs refinement and enlightenment, but education, most prior to that. There he mentioned that ‘The worst enemy you can have is someone who can once a dear friend’. Quoting this, he indicated the foul meaning of friendship pacts, from the time, when it was all, for anyone, to offer even his/her life for another.
Fact:
The era old fight that remained between both sages was because of the Holy miraculous cow ‘Kaamdhenu’, respected as bovine-goddess, who was in the custodianary guardianship of sage Vashishtha. Sage Vishwamitra was ‘King Kaushik’ at the time Maharishi Vashishtha hold the guardianship of Holy cow. He in his pride asked for her to embrace (metaphorically) to fulfill his wishes of enlarging his empire, but Vashishth denied saying he was just a caretaker and not the owner, owners were deities up in sky. Former taken it as a shame and tried to steal her from latter sage. However, being Maharishi, Vashishth recognized him and even after all the power King enforced, Sage’s penance and Kamdhenu’s miracle soldiers (evolved by her in self-defense) effectively defeated King Kaushik. Resulting to which King decided to gain powers by way of penance and hence became Sage.
Amish must have atleast for once read ‘Vishnu Puran’. He would be very much enlightened to know that we as the most ancient one knew how to develop genetically refined children, say, Vishwamitra and Jamadagni (Lord Parashuram’s father) which is so new to this world’s medical scientists.
Overall, this complete novel retelling of “HOLY RAMAYAN” was time waste and failure for me as I have already read and understand the original texts many times along with “Ramacharitra Manas’. But as I have already purchased this and his other hyped series of books (Shiva trilogy) so earlier when these were published, and I have this itch of finishing my hold of books, I have to go through yet another series of 3 novels which too seemed equally failure to me in prior to picking either of those. But for sure, I will not purchase the last from this series, “War of Lanka (Ram Chandra, #4)”.
For me it deserves nothing, but to mention something here I would say 1.0/5.0