Housekeeping items: heed the trigger warnings accompanying the novel, and the version of this book I read was an ARC. At the end, I will provide a TLDR since I have many thoughts on this one. Spoilers, possibly.
As someone who has read every book this author has published, I feel confident in saying that this is Earley’s best work to date. Her writing craft has improved immensely over time, and Heart of Skulls definitely reflects the evolution of an author.
That being said, Heart of Skulls struggles with some deep flaws at its fundamentals, making the rest of the novel rather shaky.
1: Our main POV character, Scott, is not a character, but a merely caricature. He is remarkably reminiscent of Joe (from the TV show YOU), but Scott lacks self-awareness, introspection, reflection, and real motivation. We are meant to believe that he is driven to do drastic things, but get no tangible explanation or, more importantly, insight. And that would be fine if the novel were something more like American Psycho; it’s simply not.
2: Natalie, the impetus for much of this novel, is flat, one-dimensional, and boring—all forgivable since this book is told through Scott’s view. However, she entered the novel in this way. From the beginning, she was a manic pixie dream girl type, lacking much of the ethereal allure. I needed much more from both Natalie and Scott to really have the following events click and make sense.
3: The novel falls into a predictable rhythm. For a suspenseful horror novel/thriller, predictability is a sin. Falling into patterns is expected, especially for Scott. However, there’s an issue when much of the novel falls into a cyclical pattern with very few repercussions, escalations, or deviations. The whole thing felt very low-risk, and, for the caliber of events in the novel, that shouldn’t be the case.
4: A list of smaller issues that I noted: very little levity to contrast the darkness, an oddly manufactured sense of urgency in the forms of a few random headlines and suspicious friends (but zero pay off, so it felt cheap), the first part of the novel was definitely its weakest and hard to get through.
Heart of Skulls had some great parts in it, too, however that really shine through.
1: The writing itself was quite strong—particularly the last few chapters had chills creeping down my back. There were numerous lines that I highlighted and appreciated.
2: While dark and violent, it didn’t feel gratuitous or showboating. In fact, some of the more violent scenes had some of my favorite introspection from Scott.
3: The last chapter was simply sublime.
4: Desmond entering the scene brought some much-needed motivation for Scott and his actions. The supermarket scene with Desmond, Natalie, and Scott was stellar and if the entire book had carried that momentum it would’ve easily been 5 stars.
5: There was an escalation in the beginning half of the novel (chair to gallery to girl) that was so realistic and I wished had played out more throughout.
TL;DR: At the end of the day, Heart of Skulls is not a terrible novel. It suffers greatly from fundamental problems, and that keeps it from reaching its true potential. However, there are nuggets of gold that might be enough to have me returning again.