What do you think?
Rate this book


144 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1994
I'm not a fan of Fritz. She is an admirer of Rousseau's notion that morality is rooted in neither reason or revelation but in the natural feeling of compassion. Fritz's claim that Harriet's compassion is the primary motivation in writing Uncle Tom's Cabin's doesn't jibe with the Know-Nothing views she absorbed at her father's knees. Ignoring those views don't mean they exist.
Who can admire a writer who writes such anthropopathistic nonsense: "But now the country itself took a hand in determining the future of Harriet Beecher." It gets worse. Instead of explaining what actually happened (A group of Know-Nothings worried about German Catholic immigration to the Midwest, donated money to begin Lane Theological Seminary and needed a star to fire up the troops - Lyman Beecher). Fritz writes "The West was opening up, and clearly the character of the United States would be affected." It's fair to conclude that Fritz shares Lyman Beecher's opinion that America's character would be adversely affected by Catholicism.
Lyman Beecher returned from terrorizing poor German Catholic immigrants in 1834 terrorize Catholics in the Boston-area. His incendiary 3 speeches on August 9, 1834 provoked a two day riot. It began with the burning of the Ursuline Convent/Academy in Charlestown, MA. For decades, destruction to Catholic Church property made them impossible to insure - throughout New England. Given that unpleasant incident Fritz is either ignorant or deliberately insensitive (could she have a bizarre sense of humor?) or she'd have refrained from using the word scorch as in" "Lyman's scorching blood rose. He wanted a share in shaping the West." "The moral destiny of our nation," he said, "turns on the character of the West." Fritz fails to include Lyman's vision that he was in Cincinnati to "battle the Pope for the garden spot of the world."
What affect did being raised by 19th cenury's equivalent of the Grand Wizard of the Klu Klux Klan have on his children? As rigidly as any Victorian, Fritz refuses to even acknowledge the elephant in the room and blames the father's Calvinism, sexism, and bouts of depression produced one son's sex scandal, two suicides, and various other patholigies in the children but since they were involved in the issues of their day it's all well and good.
If you want your children to learn real history - as opposed to anachronistic morality tales - this is a book to avoid. It's said because Fritz is a talented writer. Think what she could do with a rational philosophy of history!