2023 reads: 12
Rating: 4.5 stars
Alan J. Thompson is lecturer in New Testament at Sydney Missionary and Bible College, Australia. In this brief volume,The Acts of the Risen Lord Jesus: Luke's Account of God's Unfolding Plan, published by IVP in 2011, Thompson sets out to provide a “framework for interpreting the book of Acts.” (17) Thompson argues that Acts is an account of the “‘continuing story’ of God’s saving purposes.” (17) If one is understand Acts correctly, “reading it in light of OT promises and the continuing reign of Christ is imperative.” (17) It is through the lens of the ‘inaugurated kingdom of God’ that Thompson then explores otherwise disparate ideas–the resurrection, Israel and Gentile relations, the Holy Spirit, the temple, the law, and apostolic authority–showing how they can in fact be integrated under this rubric of ‘inaugurated kingdom of God’. Thompson is convinced that this dovetails with Luke’s own explicit aims: “to provide assurance [“ἀσφάλειαν,” Lk 1:4] concerning the continued outworking of God’s saving purposes.” (19) Thompson’s modus operandi is chiefly exegetical–focusing on patterns, summary statements, major events, terms, inclusios, and themes (26-27)–yet is ushered along by a conscious biblical-theology and inaugurated eschatology.
The Acts of the Risen Lord Jesus is a wonderful introduction to the book of Acts. Thompson shows how under the rubric of inaugurated eschatology, a vast array of subjects find their place. Thompson’s overall emphasis–that Luke provides assurance for a Christian audience–was compelling. The claim that Jesus was Israel’s Messiah obviously required theological reflection given his rejection and murder at the hands of Israel’s religious leaders and the might of Rome. Luke has largely provided a case for this tricky situation in his first volume, but here in Acts, now that Jesus has ascended, a defense is given for God’s continuing work of salvation despite the Messiah’s visible absence, and the apparent suffering the early movement faced. Two other proposals were also gleaned from this book: first, is Pentecost as the (inaugurated) restoration of Israel. Thompson draws attention to the presence of Jews from far and wide and the outpouring of the Spirit upon those who repented and believed. (109) That he connects this with Ezekiel 37 was also novel and eye-opening. (129) Second was Thompson’s discussion about Stephen’s speech, specifically his seeing “the glory of God, and Jesus standing at the right hand of God.” (Acts 7:55-56) I had never connected this reference to “glory” with the temple rhetoric (170). All in all, Thompson’s volume brings an immense amount of inaugurated eschatology to the fore, making Acts jump off the page in its eschatological emphasis.
The Acts of the Risen Lord Jesus stimulated questions about the nature of the interim period between the ‘now’ and the ‘not yet.’ (67) Of course, the kingdom advances through the kerygma of local churches and their suffering at the hands of competing kingdoms, but what exactly is the nature of this period? A second idea for further inquiry would be an investigation into the meaning of “God’s visitation” as it is disclosed in the first and second testaments. (121) Finally, another thought relates to Thompson’s discussion on the role of the law in Acts. I had not seen it argued before that the decrees of the “apostles and elders” were distinguished over and above the “laws of Moses.” (Acts 15) (186) For Thompson, it is the uniqueness of the times, the inaugurated eschatology, that accounts for this shift. I would love to push into this and probe the idea further. If there is any weakness of this volume, it is the minor lack of interaction with opposing views and current critical scholarship. Given its largely Evangelical audience, this is of course a secondary objective, and in no way lessens the fine work that is The Acts of the Risen Lord Jesus.
[Read for the Gospels & Acts doctoral seminar with Dr. Pennington, Summer 2023]