Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Themes in British Social History

Gender in English Society 1650-1850

Rate this book
A lively social history of the roles of men and women - from workplace to household, from parish church to alehouse, from market square to marriage bed. Robert Shoemaker investigates such varied topics as crime, leisure, the theatre, religious observance, notions of morality and even changing patterns of sexual activity itself.

346 pages, Textbook Binding

First published March 6, 1998

2 people are currently reading
35 people want to read

About the author

Robert Shoemaker

7 books1 follower

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
3 (14%)
4 stars
9 (42%)
3 stars
8 (38%)
2 stars
1 (4%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
Profile Image for Mir.
4,975 reviews5,328 followers
May 14, 2015
Shoemaker characterizes the long 18th century as marked by increased separation of male and female roles. Since the book was published 1998, this argument was hardly novel; in fact, it followed a decade of increased questioning of the adequacy of this model following the 1989 translation of Habermas' The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society and its more nuanced examination of the public/private divide. Shoemaker alludes briefly to this historiographical debate in his short conclusion but does not proceed to any in-depth conceptual discussion, perhaps because he covers the more theoretical dimensions of this subject in another work coauthored with Mary Vincent. This collection includes material by Amanda Vickery (an established critic of the separate spheres model), John Tosh, and Leonore Davidoff, Gisela Bock, Joan W. Scott, and Lyndal Roper.

I would recommend this book primarily for undergraduate history majors. Chapters are arranged thematically: sexuality, family life, religion, politics, society and culture. It is clear and easy enough to follow, although as one may guess from the preceding paragraph, somewhat dated in its lack of theoretical engagement. It also fails to discuss the feminist movement and its role in shaping this field of study -- note that "gender," as was generally the case in this period, means "women".
Profile Image for Grey.
199 reviews4 followers
March 15, 2024
really a 3.5* for moi i think
Profile Image for Andie .
78 reviews3 followers
May 10, 2022
So informative! I loved this!!!
(I read this through the months of January and February for my master’s dissertation)
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.