It was really a good read. It was interesting to see that it kept your interest all the way through it. I could have done without the sex, but that is just my opinion. I didn't realize when i bought the book on amazon that it was a romance book of a sort, but it was still good. It had a truly good story, I loved Robins attitude throughout it, right when you thought a boring part (or not so adventurous part) was coming up, a part that you knew you would just have to read and get through before the good stuff again, more adventurous or fun stuff, Princess Robin would say or do something, or Sir Simon would and it really wasn't boring anymore. There seemed to be a lot of comic relief in it, but it really wasn't comical as much as it would make me snort with a mock laugh, or smile thinking "That was good", or the more common in the beginning of the book "seriously, he said that to her?"
I really liked in the end when the king recognized her as his daughter. I am truly a sucker for stuff like that, it seems so sweet and makes me happy. I mean who wouldn't want to know they have a faithful child out there, and then be surprised in finding them when they thought there was none. I enjoyed the book a lot and thought it was well thought out and written. I liked the fact that it wasn't written in 1st person. I just finished reading another book that while it was really good and all, I didn't like that it was written in 1st person, it just seemed kind of weird to read to me, I was alway taught that you don't write in 1st person cause you want to use me, my, and I and you are not suppose to, then again that was in high school. I liked that the end was a settlement of things nicely and neatly ending it without any asking yourself well what is going to happen to this, or that. And it also ended in a way that you know the wedding was not the end but the beginning of something else, but that would be for another story, for then anyway I felt content that all of the little issues were neatly folded up and put away.
Now for what I didn't like. There really wasn't much that I didn't like. I didn't like how John wasn't really the villain like I had read in other books, but Dana Taylors version did make a lot of sense, although he ended up seeming like a very one dimensional character. I just don't understand how a character can seem to not care about anything in the story line, but that is just me I think. I thought the description of Basil was terrible. The book described him physically but not really personally. It was mentioned a few times as to way he was the way he was but not to any sort of point that was on a truly personal level. It might have been Mrs. Taylor's intention, not wanting to draw attention away from her main characters, and is absolutely fine, just not the complete explanation's that I like, but again that is just me personally. I read the book because it seemed fun, and my 12 year old daughter likes Robin Hood and just finished reading yet another book about Robin Hood so I had Robin Hood on the brain. Really I don't understand how you can expect a story about one thing to be interesting when it has been told and retold to death. Only so much can be written about the exact same thing and still seem unique in some way. So when I came across the story of Robin Hood but with some major twists but still seeming like the original story i had to read it. I really wasn't expecting it to be all the original seeming and all but was quickly surprised within the first 12 pages that it was. I think it was worth my time to read and I wasn't disappointed in the least.